Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a very new Recaro Sports electric height adjustable seat with a Skyline GTS-T mounting frame (drivers side) ready to go. Just need to wire up the connector and attach via the four bolts.

Better looking than the GTR Recaro's (similar shape) and the last of the Sports seats with the 4 point harness holes. Grey in colour. Lumbar support adjustment via air bladder in seat. Very comfortable seat. Certainly stops you from sliding off the seat in those fast corners.

Will have photo's soon.

Cost me $2200 fully installed and is only a couple of months old. No damage at all.

Willing to sell for $1400. Can supply in Sydney or near lower Blue mountains.

Also -

I have original air intake/filter and associated pipework for GTS-T series 2 (make an offer).

and

set of the four original series 2 alloys in top condition ($400).

and

R33 front strut brace about 6 months old in good condition - $100

another pic.

The electric adjustment pivots from the front of the seat when it raises or lowers the seat. Front of seat pulls out for more leg support.

One word of warning is that the front of the seat sits 3-4 cm higher than the original GTS-T seats due to the extra hight adjustable mechanism so if you have short legs it might be an issue. Probably better suited to 170cm or taller drivers.

it's only the front edge of the seat that sits higher. Your bum would basically sit in the same hight as the old seat (with it lowered fully). Knees certainly get close to the steering wheel with this seat. I'm 183cm tall and it feels just right. Just don't raise the seat all the way or you will end up bumping your head.

Not too fussed if someone doesn't buy it as I wouldn't mind using it in the next car I end up with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...