Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep the front and rear should have "antisqueel" plates/shims that are tranfered between pads when you change them. Most pads will squeel without the plates. In the past ive removed the antisqueel plates as it seems to help remove pad knock off. But the squeeling was so annoying ive put them back on the fronts only.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15297-brakes/page/2/#findComment-361419
Share on other sites

Rob,

They are perforated shims of approximately the same shape as the back of the pad. There are normally a few perforated shims with a solid one that backs them. They sit between the back of the pad and the callipers pistons and snap over the edge of the pad for location. To be perfectly honest Im not sure how they work, tho I can guess it’s a form of insulation between the pad and the piston that slightly cushions the pad on light applications and reduces the transfer of the vibration (squeal) to the calliper. Just guessing here!!!

Pad knock off is when the callipers piston is lightly pushed back(by the pad hitting/knocking the disc) whereby the brake pedal is felt to sink slightly before braking the car as the initial application only takes up the gap the knock off created between the pad and the disc. It’s normally only felt during very hard driving, but can be incredibly disconcerting in extreme examples. It’s possible to purchase anti knockoff springs that sit behind the piston and apply a slight preload.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15297-brakes/page/2/#findComment-361551
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
×
×
  • Create New...