Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The information I have found on this sensor is pretty in-conclusive. Could someone set me straight on this ?

IS this a exhuast temperature sensor ?

What is its purpose in the miriad of processes involved in running the beasty 2.5lt donk ?

This question may be redundant but would it matter if I was to simply leave this sensor out ? I assume not perceptibly since i found A pair of posts stateing that they hadnt nticed anything but this isnt quite the fact i was looking for. maybe over time something could go bang so I ask.

This is currently a problem for me as I have recently aquired a wide body catco 3" cat to match my 3" cat back system and only need a front+dump aka batmbl revised version. ^^

the catco cat has no port for this sensor so I need to know if thats a problem, I also need to know where would be an equally good place to install the sensor should it be a requirement that is not in the cat, I dont want to hinder flow and havent seen the sensor itself out of the cat so i dont know if its going to cause a choke point... possibly why its in the cat to begin with ?

if the cat is the best for this reason, can i just drill a hole an tap a thread in or is there some part of hte cat process I could damage doing this, assuming there is a chemical reaction going on in the cat to change gasses and prevent the toxicity shite aka the point of having a cat in the first place.

new cat... what to do ?

so pro's / con's of removing would be something helpful.

also in hte future a second hand pfc or equiv management system will eventually go in, will this sensor be of use to the tunning process or the day to day running on a non factory ecu? will they make use of it ?

links in various directions could help me...

cheers

Thanks guys.

Am I likely to get to a range of heat. in my exhuast that could cuase a problem ? Im assuming this is some sort of indicator of how hot the engine is running / burning ? oil temps probably being a lot more relevant, but what would this be providing a warning for ? if the exhuast is hot i doubt it will likely get to a point where this would cuase some issues. I dont know enough about it to judge that this is a safe risk to run unprotected, I dont believe it to be likely but what risks are involved... i might be a wet blanket but i wana be sure im taking an acceptable risk something isnt going to pop due to me removing something.

I've run all my cars (4 years) without the sensor.

When i say nothing will be affected, i mean it :sick:

The sensor is only there, if i recall correctly, to tell you if the cat is overheating due to mixtures not being right in the factory setup.

You are no longer running a factory setup, so it does not matter.

Thanks guys.

Am I likely to get to a range of heat. in my exhuast that could cuase a problem ? Im assuming this is some sort of indicator of how hot the engine is running / burning ? oil temps probably being a lot more relevant, but what would this be providing a warning for ? if the exhuast is hot i doubt it will likely get to a point where this would cuase some issues. I dont know enough about it to judge that this is a safe risk to run unprotected, I dont believe it to be likely but what risks are involved... i might be a wet blanket but i wana be sure im taking an acceptable risk something isnt going to pop due to me removing something.

The temp warning is for the cat - the idea being, if the cat gets blocked by one means or another the temperature

on the upstream side will go way up. View it as a health-of-cat sensor. Exhaust shops use this as a means of

gauging just how blocked your cat is :)

If you delete it you won't do any harm as long as you're cat's not blocked.

Regards,

Saliya

I've run all my cars (4 years) without the sensor.

When i say nothing will be affected, i mean it :laugh:

The sensor is only there, if i recall correctly, to tell you if the cat is overheating due to mixtures not being right in the factory setup.

You are no longer running a factory setup, so it does not matter.

Same here for me, 3 different cars and never had a problem not running it.

I had it in my old track car and the only time i used to see the light was when the car was warming up on idle on the dummy grid.

Yank the sucker out, put in your new unrestricting cat and enjoy :miner:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...