Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Posting this up on behalf of a mate of mine who's also on here, and will no doubt stick in his 2 cents :miner:

Apparently no-one beleives him that you can instantly gain 5kw+ on the dyno by just removing the airbox lid.

I was getting a touch up on my tune this week and after it was finished and dynoed, I got another run done with the airbox lid taken off.

Nothing else was touched. These runs were literally back to back, same dyno, same day, same tune. Only difference was the airbox lid was removed for the second run.

scan0002-1.jpg

As you can see, with no airbox lid (the blue line) there is a clear gap over the entire graph. More power everywhere, with even more top end.

It also affected the afr's as you can see, and was knocking a bit at the top end. A re-tune would be needed if you were to run with the lid off all the time.

So as you can see, it DOES increase power....happy Justin? :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153510-airbox-vs-airbox-without-lid/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not starting an arguement. . . . . Just food for thought!

What hasn't been considered here is real life conditions. In that test the results are conclusive but it was carried out on a dyno with (what i suspect) was an open bonnet and massive fan creating air flow.

But if you carried out the test in normal road conditions (closed bonnet with out readily avalible cold air in stop, start or even spirited driving) you could assume the same rule applies as for pods = heat soak and sucking in trapped very hot under bonnet air.

this arguement will never be resolved if even the japanese tuners run both factory airbox's and non-enclosed pods in their high powered cars even to this day.

Personally, which ever you chose, they both require sealed cold air feeds. Which one you chose depends on your own preference

my car has neva run an enclosed pod and has run magical at calder running good times and even on street. Suffers in heat though. Alot of tuners these days tune on street without a dyno, and just checking everything else n dyno.

I totally agree Matt, an open bonnet will not allow the opened air filter to hear soak thats why i will be customising the top lid on my car's air box to act as an CAI yet able to clear the FMIC kit once fitted...

However, nice result :cheers:

Cheers

my car has neva run an enclosed pod and has run magical at calder running good times and even on street. Suffers in heat though. Alot of tuners these days tune on street without a dyno, and just checking everything else n dyno.

I know of several people that run non-enclosed pods and haven't ever had a problem but I know my car (an R32 which I have retained the standard airbox with a fabricated intake to the factory spot and now a second feed via the spare intercooler piping hole) runs consistant intake temps and flows just as well but with no chance of defect and reduced noise.

vacuum tests through the intake system have shown the only real restriction was the feed to the air box. So fix that and your laughing. (on an R32 GTS-T with only light mods at this stage)

R33 and R34 with their diferent air box setup may find totally different results, I wouldn't know.

At different power levels the field moves again and the induction bellows has even been known to suck closed. So I wasn't giving a difinitive statement saying exposed pods are bad just that any intake is always going to benifit from a DECENT cold air feed.

As I said, it's your choice but would it be fair to say that if your car goes magically with an exposed pod that it might possibly go magically+1 with a sealed partition and cold air feed?

I think tuning on the road is better than dyno tuning (but thats a whole other subject).

I was pionting out the fact that you don't drive around with your bonnet up and a huge fan to supply an abundance of cold air to the panel therefore you can't relate it to a street applicatiopn were the panels only form of cold air feed would come from ram air only when the car is adiquately moving.

Out of interest where was the air temp sensor when you did the two runs? Just interested as I did the same thing but both runs were the same - for both my runs the air temp sensor was on the flat panel filter. Cheers.

I have had my old r32 turned and as stated earlier we cracked the airbox but on mine it made no differance .The reason we cracked it was to test the cai .Was done on the dyno with cool air fan blowing to the front of the car all dyno runs were done with the bonnet down to simulate actual driving conditions cai ran from airbox to front bumper air intake worked a charm test was done by Hitman who reconed that it might have even lost a little if anything .Goes the show the importance of proper engine breathing and a good cai.

Cheers Peter

put the bonnet down and that power goes south for the winter. You can modify the top front of the lid for another more forward facing duct. As long as there is a duct collecting cool air outside the engine bay it's all roses.

Always do the final tunes with the bonnet down it gets you a better base for your road tunes.

What you have proved is that the stock box is not supplying enough air.

stock GTST box is restrcitive above about 230rwkw. But ur results show its restrictive everywhere. Intake pipe will collapse as the stock instake wont allow enough air in above 230 I found. GTRs dont have this issue as they feed air from both the snorkel and the wheel arch which is enough to fix the problem.

If you want to run a stock box with power levels above 1bar then u need to vent the box better. I have designed a new lid and snorkel setupto keep it stock looking which should do the trick.

Currently I had to revert to a Pod setup which I have boxed and covered with Heat Foam stuff. Plus I have a 3" duct from the front bar where the stock IC pipes were.

When running on the dyno with the stock box...I took the lid off and tried which helped...but not a viable solution for driving under normal consitions so whats the point.

Essentially u have proved that the filter element is not the cause of most concern,,,its how the air is getting into the box...the reason pods work is they free up that restriction...but have the neg. effect of potentially sucking in hot air which probably defeats the purpose. Duct it from the fron, box it up and u will be fine.

However due to the two intake mod rule in Vic...I want to retain the stock air box and hence designed a new one that looks stock.

I removed the airbox lid on my car. (cut it all away except for the outer rim that holds filter on)

Then I mounted it vertically behind the headlight.

Then ran a duct from front bar up behind headlight.

Never suffered in heat, always wanted to suck cool air. Pretty easy to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...