Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

essentially those digrams look like what i have done...bigger snorkel, bigger lid = more air. wait for the finished product sometime. Its made to fit the stock clips and is black alminium. unless u really know ur lines u wouldn't know the difference.

Justins design might as well just wack a pod in there...

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hehe i rekon you'd be surprised.. it gives it that good pod feel without the gay sucking noise.

hehe...nar I mean from the hot air...but would fix the issue at high power with stock intakes with the extra vent...problem is its sucking hot air only.

essentially those digrams look like what i have done...bigger snorkel, bigger lid = more air. wait for the finished product sometime. Its made to fit the stock clips and is black alminium. unless u really know ur lines u wouldn't know the difference.

Justins design might as well just wack a pod in there...

So it'll be made up nicely and wont look like some cheap arse back yard job. Sounds like my style.

Any chance of getting some more made up for people that want them at a price obviously...?

hehe...nar I mean from the hot air...but would fix the issue at high power with stock intakes with the extra vent...problem is its sucking hot air only.

Would there be any air flow coming from behind the headlight area? I know on some cars air passes through around the headlights...but on others they are completely sealed

Would there be any air flow coming from behind the headlight area? I know on some cars air passes through around the headlights...but on others they are completely sealed

there is air there...mainly form the engine bay and generally air that has passed though the radiator.

If there is enough intrest I might sell them but it wont be cheap its not a $100 do job.

Got a rough price? If they're quality made and do the job I'd be interested

nope. I just told the guys to make it. They will give me a price once done. I will have a template though which can be used to laser cut more, just needs to be bent up and welded I think.

Are you going to insulate it with something?

Won't the aluminium heat up in the engine bay and be heat soaked more than plastic?

its not aluminium!

Will be a thin steel...thermal conducivity of steel if about 3/4 less that aluminium. Couple that with a thermal foam shield (stuff u can get from clark rubber) and I'm sure its good enough for my application.

I will also be replaceing the intake pipe at the same time.

my mistake. its not Al.

just u a pod for now and be done with it.

But after all this discussion I'm thinking about dodgying up a cheap version right now using the feed from the stock IC pipe and a hole in the lid...that would do the trick also - might go see what pipes I can get and give it a go.

thats the problem...there's nothing like this (that I know of at least) for the R33. with it being such a popular model, you'd think companies like SS inductions in Australia would make something for it...not to mention japanese companies...

While purchasing some stuff on Nengun I found these for the EVO;

nengun-0183-00-monster-carbon_fiber_intake_duct.jpg

Now that is EXACTLY what I'd like on my car, doesn't matter if its carbon or plastic... just looks perfect!

That dosent look to hard to make, you could make a mock up one out of steel or alloy, using the same design (having the air intake in the grill) then get it made up in plastic or carbon (expensive), i just had a quick look at my car, it looks like you would have to modify the bonnet a little bit by cutting some of the front of the bonnet frame out (which might be illegal) so that you could fit a decent snorkel in between the bonnet and the radiator support bar, which would then connect up to the air intake mouth in the grill.

Only problem would be water getting into the airbox when its raining :action-smiley-069:

Edited by nizmo_freek
It looks like you would have to modify the bonnet a little bit by cutting some of the front of the bonnet frame out (which might be illegal) so that you could fit a decent snorkel in between the bonnet and the radiator support bar, which would then connect up to the air intake mouth in the grill.

I'm not too concerned with the intake being in the grill, just that it is larger than stock and integrated into the lid.

The one pictured is actually available with a shorter intake that places it in the stock position. Which would be more what 33 owner would be after.

Fellas,

i dont want hijack a thread here but, i moved from NSW recently where John and the boys at UAS in sydney had fitted my R33Gst-t with FMIC and CAI amongst other things.

i got it inspected and RWC'd down here when i swapped over the Rego.

The inspecting officer went over my car with a fine tooth comb, but didnt say boo about my Pod (which is fitted in fully enclosed in a fibreglass box) and FMIC.

but i understand from reading here (and the LAW posted elsewhere on the forum) that you can only have one of these two mods, anybody got some clarification???

Does it HAVE to be stock or can it be fully enclosed?

can do photo if needed.

Edited by 33Bane

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...