Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some trivial questions for you guys.

Looking at completing my exhaust. I have an a/f cat back system (w/ 2 mufflers).Was looking at upgrading the front/dump pipe and the cat.

1. Just curious if most front/split dump pipes are equal? Was planning on going to the local exhaust shop and picking up what they have on offer. Otherwise I know bablm has his ones sold for $380.

2. Also is it worth getting a new high flow cat, or just gut the stock one? Any disadvantages using a stock gutted cat?

3. WIth a high flow cat, its a given that the exhaust will be louder keeping all other things equal right? I want to keep my exhaust the way it is - quiet but deep.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153645-frontdump-pipes-cat-upgrade/
Share on other sites

batmbl ones seem pretty good for the price

gutted cats r illegal as far as i know (not worth the $10k or so fine), unless ur in NZ

and yeh the exhaust will b louder, but the turbo will spool faster

batmbl ones seem pretty good for the price

gutted cats r illegal as far as i know (not worth the $10k or so fine), unless ur in NZ

and yeh the exhaust will b louder, but the turbo will spool faster

Thanks will shop around for front/dump pipes. Will keep batmbl ones in mind though. Are most front/dump pipes equal though as long as u get a split dump?

How restrictive is the stock cat, say if i upgraded just the front dump pipe and use stock cat?

i dont see any reason for them not to be the same, a pipes a pipe but im sure there are many ppl here that can correct me on that

as far as the cat goes, its always the most restrictive part of an exhaust system, have a look at it, from the flange its like a bottle neck.

even if u just upgrade the cat itself u will get some gains.

check out this thread http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...2&hl=batmbl

Edited by r32woohoo

the front dump pipes of batmbl are a bolt on if thats what your getting at, i had a 3" hi flo cat pu on i would say its louder at idle or driving normaly but when u sink the slipper into it, sounds more meaty up high, 4g up then before. i also have one of batmbl's split front and dumps i put it on my self pretty easy there a good upgrade

batmbl is 1st rate trader no complaints. I had a 3inch turbo exhaust end-to-end, and for compliancing purposes, a stock cat was fitted.

I purchased the Catco Metal cat 3inch, with 5inch barrell, to the amazement of my mechanic it bolted on no dramas.

I am sorry to say but it made no difference in performance for me. (Apart from the exhaust my car was stock).

Noise wise, it was exactly the same loudness both, before and after the cat refit.

Maybe if I do further mods like ECU refit, Side mount, and up boost, and fuel, might it help...But sorry in my experience to date, it just didnt do anything for me?

I got a batmbl stainless split dump/front pipe and a 5 inch metal cat in a group buy a while ago. Had both installed for $80, as i couldnt be bothered risking breaking the turbo exhaust flange studs and having my car stuck at home...

Anyway there was a noticable increase in power, at a guess 15-20kW? And it seems to spool faster as well. My car is completely stock power mods wise except for the cat back exhaust and pod filter, and now the new bits.

I would also think that the 5 inch metal type cats would probably be less of a restriction than a 3 inch home-gutted stock cat.

I better than stock zorst will always help spool.

The stock cat. eps if its like 10 years old will be about screwed.

Get a good hi-flo like a Catco...I got an Apexi dump pipe and 720CFM catco. Seems to do the job.

When these metal cats die... Do they break up in to chunks as my last ceramic crap cat did or do they just melt in to a lump of metal? :happy:

I think they melt or become blocked and then u notice some serious restrictions at high rpm. A mate of mine had some hi end issues with his NA and it was the cat...replaced it, was good as gold.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...