Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'll tell you guys all something, i'm getting raped!!!

$2997 Premium

Excess at any given time is 2k +/- with age/vehicle/history/gender excess added on top...

so any claim i make i need to pay at LEAST 1.5k excess + anything else i need to add to my claim

19 years old

Loss of License once with many speeding fines

so i guess my history explains my policy expenses :P

Car: 1994 gts-t skyline

Insurance company: just cars

Cost: $423 (THird party only)

age: 18

driving history: one claim third party so clear record

gender: female

mods: exhaust

post code: 4565

garage y/n: no

alarm: no

insured amount: $10,000

market or agreed value: 9,500

insured in parents name? no

alarm category:

allowed unlimited modifications which are covered when i tell them about them and are legal

excess: 1400

thats were i live now though. when i was in wa it was a diferent story

Edited by 000DNK

HBF

Car:1998 r34 GTT

Premium: $1,843 a year

Excess: $250

Insured to agreed value of $26,000

alot of you guys are getting jacked with insurance prices...

Mind you, i drive it like a nanna most of the time... 9 points left on my license and im 25 so... :D

How do some of you get away with having boost controllers? HBF told me most mods are ok but my insurance is void if a put on a boost controller... even though they accessed the car when some dick clipped the front end of it and said nothing about it!

Car: 1998 Skyline ER34 GTT

Insurance company: HBF

Cost: 1120 p.a

age:27

driving history: 7 years of good record (except traffic offences! :D )

gender: M

mods: FMIC, air filter, 3in exhaust, dump pipe

post code: 6004

garage y/n: Y

alarm: was told autowatch with built in turbo timer but the brand on the remote says otherwise. :P

insured amount: 18k

market or agreed value: 18k?

insured in parents name? nope

alarm category: ??

excess: 300

lol people paying over $2000k is getting robbed major bad for just GST-T's

i started max @ $1850/yr @ age of 18 like years ago... n yeah it was with "Just Car"

well try HBF... i got them now... i saved $400 /yr on the car below n gained unlimited windows n no claims proctection too

MY NEW CAR IS WITH THEM.. its cheap

Car: 2003/2004 Nissan 350z '6spd'

Insurance company: HBF CAR INSURANCE

Cost: $1480/yr

age: 21

driving history: good

gender: Male

mods: POD

post code: 6030

garage y/n: y/n

alarm: y

insured amount: $46,000

market or agreed value: Agreed

excess:450

extra's

Unlimited Windows :D

Car: 1993 Nissan Skyline R33 GTS-T

Insurance company: Just Car Insurance

Cost: $2,500 a/yr

age: 19

driving history: ok, 1 speeding fine, no accidents

gender: Female

garage y/n: y

alarm: y

company: Just CAr

Car: r33 GTS T 1995

History: 1 speeding fine (14km over the limit, September 2004)

Age: 21

Mods: Unlimited, as long as i let them know what i have

Third Party Fire and theft: ~550 (cant remember exactly)

Full Compre: $1450

Edited by br3ndan

Car: 1993 Skyline R33 GTS-T

Insurance company: Just Car

Cost: $308

age: 21

driving history: Clean, no fines yet...

gender: Male

mods: CAT, Steering wheel

post code: 6060

garage y/n: yes

alarm: Immobiliser only

insured amount: N/A

market or agreed value: N/A

insured in parents name? No

alarm category: Basic immobiliser

excess: $450 + $650 :laugh:

damn, there's alot of variations out there.

car: 97 33 gtr v-spec, 500 odd ponies.

value: 36k

mods: turbo's, cams, exhaust, ecu, rims, alarm etc.

age: 29

insurer: justcar

price: $850

excess: 3.5k

history: loss of license less than 5 years ago.

most places said F*^* OFF. Justcar said 'whatever', just the excess is a lot. But if I crash it, 3500 is the least of my worries.

haha

excel, 20, in dads name, 6 points on license, $600 with sgio

excess is 400+350

shows ya that sometimes it doesnt really matter what type of car it is, but what type of driver it is (i mean george's is cheaper then mine and the car is million times better :D and its in his name - mines in my dads name)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...