Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have the SB8006A which is a GT30 with 0.82 Exh.

Compressor specs

0.70 A/R

64 Trim

GT40 wheel

2.41/3.22 wheel diameter

550Hp

65 lbs per min. flow

Turbine specs

0.82 A/R

84 Trim wheel

2.16/2.36 wheel diameter

Mounted on the factory manifold with an adapter for the 45mm progate.

Should be VERY responsive! [Cue evil grin]

Only need to make a desicion on ECU, then in it goes :whackit:

it is going into a Datsun 240K, hence why i am getting all the parts as i go (i am starting out from scratch).

so i basically have the rb25de and loom, rb30 bottom, want to add a turbo, and need to know what computer to get to run it with

so the RB20DET AP Engineering PowerFC will fit the RB25DE loom? phew! what extra wires / sensors would i need to run for the turbo (if any?)

thanks joel

AFAIK, the D-Jetro version of the PowerFC allows you to use MAF, instead of AFM, not sure what engines it covers though (or what you need to add to it) http://www.greenline.jp/catalogue/electron...p#apengineering

Yer it will run.. As said only one or two things missing (knock sensor & unsure if n/a have the map sensor up near the powerbooster)

If you need a copy of the R32 Engine manual drop me a pm and i'll give you a link to dload it.

Its got wiring diagrams in there from memory and that should show the exact differences.

Its not difficult to run a few wires from any extra's.

Rb20DET loom is obviously the best choice but there is no problems with the rb25de loom.

as far as i know, it doesn't have vct anyway (well, atleast i can't seem to find anything that indicates it is vct)

using the Rb20det AP eng. PFC, that would mean i would also need to go low impedence injectors? (GTR ones, meaning replacing the fuel rail for top feed too?)

damn.. and after a 2 month search for an RB25DE loom :)

would i have the option of using an RB25DET computer? or are the looms (and sensors) completely different (if so what is the difference?), and the lack of vct too much?

*R32 RB25DE has no VVT, R33 RB25DE has VVT.

*The RB20det APE PFC runs the standard RB20DET injectors which are high impedance (13-14 ohms).

*Match the loom, the sensors and the ECU and you won't have any problems.

*It doesn't matter if you use a VVT ECU with an engine that doesn't have VVT. Just make sure you use the same model loom, sensors and ECU

*We have an R32 GTST loom, sensors and ECU on an RB31DET with RB26 top end. I just made sure I used the same model loom, sensors and ECU.

Got it? :D

running in my rb30det... ohh how i love MY and RB30DET on the same line a bit way too much :D heheheheee

Would labouring the engine to bed the rings in be bad? or good? i hear conflicting storys about this.

Im using valvoline running in oil

That depends on what your definition of what labouring is.

Just drive around with your foot down, be sure not to rev too high though. :)

Labouring is trying to take off in third or pulling out of a corner doing 20km/h in fourth.

Labouring is always bad for motors (car shudders and won't accelerate)

Hey, ive got a question about the power fc for the RB20DET, on the greenline motorsports site its says for use with low impendance injectors only, is this correct? and if so do you still have to use a resistor with the low impendance ones? Im currently building an RB30 and ive got a power fc on the way but dont want to buy injectors till im positive they are the right ones.

Thanx

GO DA RB30DET

"search this thread" function does not seem to be working, it runs off into a complete forum search so forgive me if this has been covered.

With the discussion about getting cars engineered, has anyone successfully done this with an RB30DET as these are not a production motor and do not have a production ECU, so cannot have approved emissions tests.

Thanks

"search this thread" function does not seem to be working, it runs off into a complete forum search so forgive me if this has been covered.

With the discussion about getting cars engineered, has anyone successfully done this with an RB30DET as these are not a production motor and do not have a production ECU, so cannot have approved emissions tests.

Thanks

I saw an RB30DET with an RB20DET engine number the other day, well well. :headspin:

I guess it's OK, when you buy a new block from Nissan, it comes with no engine number. The idea being that you put the engine number off the old, damaged block onto the new one.

PS; Just don't forget to machine off the RB30 cast into the side of the block. :)

I saw an RB30DET with an RB20DET engine number the other day, well well. :headspin:  

I guess it's OK, when you buy a new block from Nissan, it comes with no engine number.  The idea being that you put the engine number off the old, damaged  block onto the new one.

PS; Just don't forget to machine off the RB30 cast into the side of the block. :)

are there ways of telling that an engine has been restamped? i heard that changing engine numbers if fraud and you just dont do it.

Dont the EPA have a blue light or something that can bring up the original engine number if its been re-stamped? then they bust your arse?

are there ways of telling that an engine has been restamped?  i heard that changing engine numbers if fraud and you just dont do it.

Dont the EPA have a blue light or something that can bring up the original engine number if its been re-stamped?  then they bust your arse?

A changed engine number is sometimes easily detected, while an altered chassis number is usually very easy to detect. When the numbers are originally stamped they obviously show on the surface, but they also deform the metal underneath quite deeply. The ultra violet and dye methods show up this deformation, despite what is restamped on top of it. It is good technology and has caught out a lot of car thieves. Hooray for that, hang the b'tards I say. :Bang: It is very effective on cut and shut and altered chassis numbers, but sometimes not so good on engine numbers.

It really depends on how much is machined off the number stamping area. Chassis number are stamped on fairly thin surfaces, in fact you can see the numbers from the other side on many cars. This is not so with engine blocks as the area is quite thick. In addition, aluminium blocks show engine number changes much better that cast iron ones as they are softer and the stamping therefore goes deeper.

But new engine blocks don't have any numbers, so there is no "original number" to bring up. Stamping of damaged block numbers on replacement blocks is of course completely legal, otherwise Nissan (and the other manufacturers) would not be able to sell new blank blocks.

Hope that is of some help. :)

hi guys...

I have a suspected, stuffed big end bearing in my RB25DET.

I'm keen to rebuild it and from reading this very informative thread I'm convinced that replacing the bottom end with the RB30 is the way to go.

What is the best way to tell if the head has sustained any damage without paying $$$ to have the motor stripped down?

As I do not have the time or expertise to do the labour myself and would be getting my workshop to do the work how much would I expect the labour to set me back, ballpark (including all the machining of parts etc)?

Am I correct in understanding that I will only require the standard RB30DE rods and pistons as my motor is running the stock turbo and I can't see myself wanting to uprgrade over the 250rwkw mark (for the next year or 2 at least)

So the only major parts costs will be the RB30 rods, pistons, block + crank and probably a PowerFC to run it?

Would the result be a more reliable package than going with a late series 2, low mileage, R33 RB25DET and just dropping it in?

Sorry for the boring questions, just my motor gave up on me at stock boost, driving at 50km/h in traffic, lightly modded, and been well looked after by me with little abuse...so I am a little paranoid:/

hi guys...

I have a suspected, stuffed big end bearing in my RB25DET.

I'm keen to rebuild it and from reading this very informative thread I'm convinced that replacing the bottom end with the RB30 is the way to go.

What is the best way to tell if the head has sustained any damage without paying $$$ to have the motor stripped down?

As I do not have the time or expertise to do the labour myself and would be getting my workshop to do the work how much would I expect the labour to set me back, ballpark (including all the machining of parts etc)?

Am I correct in understanding that I will only require the standard RB30DE rods and pistons as my motor is running the stock turbo and I can't see myself wanting to uprgrade over the 250rwkw mark (for the next year or 2 at least)

So the only major parts costs will be the RB30 rods, pistons, block + crank and probably a PowerFC to run it?

Would the result be a more reliable package than going with a late series 2, low mileage, R33 RB25DET and just dropping it in?

Sorry for the boring questions, just my motor gave up on me at stock boost, driving at 50km/h in traffic, lightly modded, and been well looked after by me with little abuse...so I am a little paranoid:/

If what you are saying is correct, it is hardley likely to be a big end bearing. RB's do not run big end bearings for no good reason. Oil starvation, poor oil quality or poor maintenance are the causes of big end bearing failure and you describe none of these. I would strongly suggest a re-diagnosis. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...