Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

-Joel- ure getting better fuel econ? is that freeway driving or city driving? or both? what are you averaging a tank so far?

Thats local 80 & 60km/h driving.

I've always had decent fuel economy.. Roughly 500km's per tank.

On the dyno the O2 sensor was working pretty well. Under light acceleration it was in closed loop mode constantly with afr's no richer than around 13.8:1.

I put the car in to O2 sensor diag mode once and drove it around to see what it was doing.. As the dyno said i could accelerate with traffic and it would constantly sit in the closed loop mode. It took a couple pounds of boost before the O2 sensor would no longer be used and the ecu would refer to its maps.

Maybe this is why Darrens R32 Rb30DET wouldn't run on the base map of the PowerFC?!?! His O2 Sensor may be stuffed.

i think this had better be mentioned in the rb2530 conversion guide!
I think it should too.. :)

This is how the rb30 guide has came about.. People post their findings..

A few people keep things to their selves or can't be bothered helping out the thread once their rb30det is up and running. :D

BUT.. The blocks you have..

Do you know the origion of them? What car what year etc?

I asked this when buying mine from the wrecker.

Maybe its a Skyline block? not a VL? Doesn't explain the turbo block you have though...

I also have to make an adopter plate to fit a 4wd sump as it will be going into a GTS4.
Could you please post your findings with the Adaptor plate.. What needs doing etc.. Even take some pics.

I will put it in the guide for us SAUer's.

I would love to have an RB30 in a GTS4. Would be absolutely awesome..

You will know what I mean once you drive the RB30.. :D

In NA form with my turbo wastegate wide open it will easily spin up the rear wheels by simply putting your foot down as you take off.

I can see my theory of the rb30 being more linear so it will be easier to control wheel spin is going to be given a good workout.

I think it should too.. :)

 

This is how the rb30 guide has came about.. People post their findings..

 

A few people keep things to their selves or can't be bothered helping out the thread once their rb30det is up and running. :D

 

BUT.. The blocks you have..

 

Do you know the origion of them? What car what year etc?

I asked this when buying mine from the wrecker.

 

Maybe its a Skyline block? not a VL? Doesn't explain the turbo block you have though...

mate i pulled them all out myself. all from series 1 commodores and 2 of them were factory turbo

Joel are u getting decent fuel economy, cos your still on the run in stage, and havent been putting the foot in as hard as you were with the rb20? :D

Mine wasn't running on the std Pfc maps, cos of the air filter adaptor i reckons... :) made the normally 80mm hole down to 50mm or so...

Mine goes in for its full tune late this week, or early next, so watch out for its first full power run :D Only thing holding it back willl be the turbo and exhaust.. :(

My 02 sensor is the std one on on the car (read 12 years old) so id expect it to be dodgy like everything else was that i replaced...

TAKE NOTE EVERYONE - dont think this is a drop in job....most things have to be replaced due to age if yer slappin in a 500 hp motor :)

Darren,

If anything I expect the motor to use more fuel during its run in as the rings don't seal as well and you tend to get more ring blow by. Hence why a car will make less power when it is really fresh compared to when it is finally run in.

I actually drive it harder with the rb30, accelerate away fromthe lights quicker and am always putting the foot down to 1/2-3/4 when exiting corners.

Towards the end there I was so so sick of the gutless rb20t I used to just put it around. The having to rev it to get any where used to annoy me. :D

Yer there's definately a couple of little variables.. The pod adaptor and the o2 sensor.

How was your fuel economy previous to the rb30?

lol yer its not just a drop in job.. I replaced every single heater hose, all fuel line hose. Everything. Heater hoses were ~$500 all up, ouch. :)

Do you think you really need to run the 02 sensor with the Power FC etc?

Why not disconnect it and turn it off in the settings and then just have the car tuned without it?

The actual tune won't be affected by a bad O2 sensor BUT what it will affect is the light throttle cruise and idle as the 02 sensor trims the maps to suit the desired AFR (14.7:1).

With a dud O2 sensor fuel consumption in a RB20 or RB25DET will drop from close to 500km's per tank to high 200's to low 300's.

Over time they loose their response time and slowly fuel consumption increases.

This can create idle hunting issues as the O2 sensor is unable to adjust the fuel quick enough.. In turn it runs too lean then too rich etc. Not the nice happy medium with a fast responding O2 sensor.

Yes but with the PowerFC you can not set how much of the map you want the 02 to adjust..

It's better to tune without it than to worry if the one you have in there isn't working like it should be?

I'm going to try without the O2 sensors and see how it goes, I have seen cars tuned without them and they get good gas milage.

I also don't want to have to buy new GTR O2 sensors.. x 2 :P

Yes but with the PowerFC you can not set how much of the map you want the 02 to adjust..

It's better to tune without it than to worry if the one you have in there isn't working like it should be?

I'm going to try without the O2 sensors and see how it goes, I have seen cars tuned without them and they get good gas milage.

I also don't want to have to buy new GTR O2 sensors.. x 2 :D

Like the standard ECU, the PFC O2 feedback is self learning. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...