Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Give us the part number of the pistons, rod length and bore.

I will work out the approx comp ratio.

I am 99% sure you will not have a 8.2-8.3:1 comp ratio.

The only pistons Wiseco sell off the shelf that have a dish are the RB30DET pistons. They give a 7:1 comp ratio. All the others have a 14cc dome.

Obviously you will have a little more comp ratio if you have a zero deck height.

BUT that will depend on the rods and how much you can deck the block if it is indeed possible to get the zero deck clearance you are after when combined with the compression height of your pistons.

Tell me the specs on the rods.. Are the EXACTLY the same size as the rb30 ones?

I'd be interested too.

DnB the rods look identical to the ones I have, SCAT modified chev rods.

The SCAT rod looks to be approx 1mm longer than the stocker.

Mine require a thicker rod bearing which needs to be chamfered to fit. I havent had it fitted/measured yet.

check this link. i have a thread on it over on our rb friends site calaisturbo

http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.php?t=30077

did you measure that with the standard chev little end bush? its bigger than the nissan one so it would measure longer if you went overall measurements rather than centres

did you measure that with the standard chev little end bush? its bigger than the nissan one so it would measure longer if you went overall measurements rather than centres

NO, the rods had bushes fitted to handle 1000hp plus for an rb30 when I bought them.

I bought the rods through a mates contacts, he works at Gold Coast Porsche.

I put the scat rod against the stock rod and compared it by eye.

Just a couple of quick questions,

Does the RB25DET oil cooler bolt straight to the RB30 block, or is it different somehow, maybe the filter bypass valve is different or something?

I haven't removed it yet for actual inspection myself, but im sure someone would know?

oilcooler.jpg

Also what is this extra drain for, i assume oil? Should i extend the line and plumb it into the sump?

Because I have seen a few conversions where this line has just been crimped shut, therfore no drain, is it critical.

Once again I havent removed it yet for actual inspection.

extradrain.jpg

Cheers for any help :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a way to adjust all of the pedals in an R32 GTS-T? they all sit even, but seem to be a little high for my liking.
    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
×
×
  • Create New...