Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I keep comapring all results to Sydney kids original rb30 engine.

475hp on engine dyno, using old t04e and standard everything on 1 bar boost..

anyway.. great results.

Some numbers to think about;

475 bhp = 355 kw

less 60 kw for losses = 295 rwkw

The engine dyno room is airconditioned at 21C , no radiator, oil cooler etc so you don't get as much heat soak as you do in the engine bay of a car on a roller dyno. The intercooler sits in a tub of water (no ice), so the temp is pretty constant. Plus we tuned the ever living crap out of it, spent 3 days on getting the maps absolutely perfect. There might be 15-20 kw advantage in all of that.

So I reckon 297 rwkw at 17 psi is damn fine effort OFENSV, well done.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of a RB25 with 26 internals, big cams, head work the works make 580hp (432kw) on an engine dyno with a GT30 600hp .82 Garrett turbo.

On the rolling road it made 335rwkw or there abouts.

Thats 97rwkw drive train loss?? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through a RB25DET 5 speed.

I found it quite interestering the before and after...

No doubt air temps and dyno differences make a difference. But non the less it was interestering to note.

I can't remember exactly how much boost, it was running but it was somewhere around the mid 20's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those interestered I went for a little drive and did a complete map trace.

Lots of light load cruise and a bit of spirited driving through the hills.

A few WOT's to 6000rpm also.

RB20DET PFC, RB30DET, Stock RB20DET Turbo that initially hits 12psi then tails off to 8-9psi rather quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting piece of trivia:

the 152-tooth Dayco 94407 timing belt is the same as that used on the Audi (Passat?) 1.8 litre twin turbo engines in their newer model cars. it is, however, much more expensive to buy it from an Audi dealer, trust me!

Cubes i have NFI what that 5hit means.

also: the 94407 is 25mm wide, but in the DIYrb30DET guide it says that it is 30mm wide. can anyone confirm that theirs is 30mm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RPM points are the X axis every 400rpm, starting from 400rpm.

Load points are the Y Axis.

I didn't actually measure my belt. It did however fill up the complete cam gear with only a mm or two to spare, so what ever the cam gear width is is pretty much what the 94407 belt is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting - the RB30 crankshaft drive cog for the cam belt is 25.4mm wide, the same as the RB30 timing belt and the belt i just bought from the audi.

the RB25 cam gears are 30mm wide, as are the RB30. i assume this is to allow for a bit of belt movement as there is no lip to guide it on to these.

are you guys using RB25 harmonic balancers and timing belt drive cogs, or are you using RB30 drive cogs? the 25 ones could be wider?

with my RB30 drive cog there is no way i could get a 30mm timing belt on there, that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RB25 harmonic balancer & RB30 drive cog.

I just had a quick measure and it is indeed ~25mm.

I don't know if a 30mm belt could fit in there to be honest.

Are u using the R32 RB25 head or??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep i'd say the DIY guide is a bit misleading in that regard, all the RB series timing belts are 25.4mm i would suggest.

a 30mm belt would NOT fit on any of the drive cogs, which are just barely the width of the belt. if the belt is enough for a 1.8L quad cam twin turbo it should be good enough for me, using standard cams and springs in addition keeps the loads down on the belt.

i have an R33 DE head - i believe the cams and springs are the same as the DET, only difference is injectors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just had a look at the guide and it doesn't state anywhere the width of the 94407 belt.

It does state that the gates belt has been cut down from 30mm to 25mm in the factory.

I don't really know I used that information from some one else so it's only hearsay.

I'll find that rb20det belt and measure the sucker. :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi guys just a quick question about head gaskets. i don't under stand squish zones. i have a rb30 with a r32 25de head, i am going to use stock pistons. which head gasket would be best, what thickness as well?

sorry if this has been covered before.

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting piece of trivia:  

the 152-tooth Dayco 94407 timing belt is the same as that used on the Audi (Passat?) 1.8 litre twin turbo engines in their newer model cars. it is, however, much more expensive to buy it from an Audi dealer, trust me!

Yes that's right, it suits the 1.8L motor used in VW passats and Audi A4's. Going by engine codes they would be the same motor.

The belts costs approx $40 from most auto parts shops.

I'd check my 94407 belt but its stored among the other parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well that's sorted - also the front-on picture given in the guide which shows the measurements where the tensioner hole needs to be drilled are spot on cubes, i put mine there and it will tension perfectly once i've tapped the hole.

did anyone use return springs on their two tensioners?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah they are locking, i wonder why there's a return spring on the RB30 tensioners, they're the same as the 25 ones i'm 99% sure? anyway i'm using two RB30 tensioners on mine and a friend's 25/30 doesn't use return springs either.

p.s. where do you get new studs for them from? they have two different threads on each end :confused: which is weird, i imagine they'd have to come from nissan..... i shudder to think of the price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...