Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i thought the sards are 850cc? or are they 800's?

Weve half fitted the water/methanol injection and got a to4z on the way. haha all these threads and people going on about to4z's and how good they are, plus the figures seem to be there. So hopefully here comes 600bhp with no knock :) very very big smiles.

I tuned a GENIII the other day that had a T04Z on it made 320rwkw on about 1 pound of boost. I ran the car with no spring in the actuator to determine if the 50mm external gate was large enough, it was. Was really impressed to see that figure.

Also in regards to your traction problem - have you tryed TPS based boost control?

Edited by rob82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also in regards to your traction problem - have you tryed TPS based boost control?

I believe i said this already mate

"Ive found so far that foot control and patience is a big thing. Flat to the floor doesnt always work as well as you might think."

In the process of learning that one mate, getting all the lead outta my boots :)

Why the sarcastic comments?

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe i said this already mate

"Ive found so far that foot control and patience is a big thing. Flat to the floor doesnt always work as well as you might think."

In the process of learning that one mate, getting all the lead outta my boots :)

Why the sarcastic comments?

I wasn't being sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so let me get this right. Your suggesting letting the turbo free spool with no spring control via the waste gate and controlling the boost/power purely by the pedal?

No I was just testing wether a 50mm gate was large enough when fully opened to control that sized turbo all the way to the rev limit - and it was as it only ran about 1 psi of boost at the rev limiter. I was suprised though as it made 320rwkw about 120rwkw more than a standard car.

What boost controller are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TPS boost control would feel rather strange after being used to a turbo snapping on hard at part throttle. Would be quite a good idea. What EBC supports such a feature?

Sounds like a really good idea, would make throttle control much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MOTEC and AUTRONIC both have TPS based boost control. We use our xede to do TPS based and semi closed loop boost control on XR6T(as they need it). THe way it works is by nesting two 3d maps. ie 1 Map is a wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis. The other map being a straight multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis. So when you dont want boost you dial it out of the with the multipier table.

The problem with alot of EVC is that once they see a set amount of throttle on board say 20percent, they then aim for the desired boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

traction...weve only got 500bhp atm and it doesnt exist. starts are shit, but when your moving its fine. Ive found so far that foot control and patience is a big thing. Flat to the floor doesnt always work as well as you might think.

But were still working it all out. It will get better.

Shane are you coming to the next track day on nov 28...cause i will be attending that, so if your there come and have a look at the car, or if your car is ready perhaps i can have a look at that :)

I should be there with the car, if the box doesnt break inbetween now and then :). Sump goes on tomorrow (well thats the plan) and then off to the exhaust shop next week and then to get tuned. So 2 weeks should be all running sweet.

if you don't mind me asking what sort of cost were they??

and where'd ya get them from

$635 from greenline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MOTEC and AUTRONIC both have TPS based boost control. We use our xede to do TPS based and semi closed loop boost control on XR6T(as they need it). THe way it works is by nesting two 3d maps. ie 1 Map is a wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis. The other map being a straight multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis. So when you dont want boost you dial it out of the with the multipier table.

The problem with alot of EVC is that once they see a set amount of throttle on board say 20percent, they then aim for the desired boost.

When i was talking to matt spryr from PITS he actually said for a track car use the power fc. Main reason he said was it had the knock sensor, unlike the autronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately just because the boost was held at 1 psi doesn't mean the w/g is big enough, as it only has to bypass 320kw of exhaust gas to hold boost there, when the car starts making boost, there is heaps more exhaust gas for it to control.

No I was just testing wether a 50mm gate was large enough when fully opened to control that sized turbo all the way to the rev limit - and it was as it only ran about 1 psi of boost at the rev limiter. I was suprised though as it made 320rwkw about 120rwkw more than a standard car.

What boost controller are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately just because the boost was held at 1 psi doesn't mean the w/g is big enough, as it only has to bypass 320kw of exhaust gas to hold boost there, when the car starts making boost, there is heaps more exhaust gas for it to control.

True but we only want to run around 6psi - it just gave us an indication of where we are going. The customer originally had a small gate before changing to this one.

Edited by rob82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MOTEC and AUTRONIC both have TPS based boost control. We use our xede to do TPS based and semi closed loop boost control on XR6T(as they need it). THe way it works is by nesting two 3d maps. ie 1 Map is a wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis. The other map being a straight multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis. So when you dont want boost you dial it out of the with the multipier table.

How do you get over the kph difference with a multi ratio (5 speed / 6 speed) manual gearbox? Keeping in mind that aerodynamic drag rises with the square of speed, but the horsepower absorbed rises with the cube of speed.

A simple example;

The boost limit (power output) for 2nd gear, 50% throttle at say 80 kph would need to be entirely different to the boost limit (power output) for 4th gear at say 180 kph. But the rpm would be the same (similar).

:P cheers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you get over the kph difference with a multi ratio (5 speed / 6 speed) manual gearbox? Keeping in mind that aerodynamic drag rises with the square of speed, but the horsepower absorbed rises with the cube of speed.

A simple example;

The boost limit (power output) for 2nd gear, 50% throttle at say 80 kph would need to be entirely different to the boost limit (power output) for 4th gear at say 180 kph. But the rpm would be the same (similar).

:O cheers >_<

Nest another table - that pulls the desired boost out w.r.t low values of VSS.

Edited by rob82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nest another table - that pulls the desired boost out w.r.t low values of VSS.

That means 1 Map and 2 Tables

Map 1 is the wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis

Table 1 is multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis

Table 2 is another multiplier table of the second map with TPS and KPH being the axis

MAP + RPM + TPS + KPH = ooops, that's 4 dimensions

How do you do that on a 3 dimensional map?

:rofl: cheers ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They should do. I have S14 (or something S chassis, anyway) driveshafts in my R32 (because my diff flanges have 3x2). They're the right length. When you go looking for R32/3/4 driveshafts (for turbos), they're all the same thing, so are the same length. So there really shouldn't be any reason why those cheapies from JJ won't also fit an R34. R32/3 NA should also be the same thing. The (3x the price) D-Max ones are uni-fit. They have 5x1 and 3x2 bolt holes and say they cover all the cars. So that would also suggest that they are all the same except for the flanges. And in that case, the flange goes both ways. I'd be buying the D-Max ones if I ever have to replace a shaft. Because that will open up diff options without needing to juggle shafts also. Juggling shafts is gay.
    • Yeah with the adaptors they do look like the photo above - just the fitment within the plenum itself and then further with the rail to the intake is questionable - we shall see tomorrow hopefully once I get some replies from Aeroflow, maybe those bosses are the missing piece....
    • Should be fine, if you have it sitting too far in, you end up just spraying the walls and have shit idle. You "can" run them like that, however I don't think it's a great idea (also depends on your plenum, might be good to just get the injector bosses first, mock it up and see if you need to get the bottom extension) Ideally your injectors, with the extension should look like this  (Not my photos, just Google)
    • Thanks for the replies guys, it's really appreciated.  It seems the kit was supposed to come with those injector bosses but hasn't. Unsure if they'll help as even with the adaptors to make them a 3/4 height injector they still sit too far out so mount the fuel rail?
    • Hello, I am looking to replace my two rear drive shafts in my R34 N/A Skyline but I'm finding conflicting information. Do S13/S14/S15 or R32 NA/ R33 NA fit? https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-rear-drive-shaft-l-h-nissan-silvia-s13-s14-s15-3x2-type?currency=AUD&srsltid=AfmBOoqY7EwDaYCUoUU3mxxZ_qrUXkVVHiV4MIN7ozoar6scjnEiekv- would this fit?
×
×
  • Create New...