Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That means 1 Map and 2 Tables

Map 1 is the wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis

Table 1 is multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis

Table 2 is another multiplier table of the second map with TPS and KPH being the axis

MAP + RPM + TPS + KPH = ooops, that's 4 dimensions

How do you do that on a 3 dimensional map?

:) cheers :D

Im pretty sure it can be done to some degree with a SM2 autronic, there is definately a speed trim, but im not sure how comprehensive it is, i think its set up for drag cars

That means 1 Map and 2 Tables

Map 1 is the wastegate solenoid map with MAP and RPM being the axis

Table 1 is multiplier table of the first map with TPS and RPM being the axis

Table 2 is another multiplier table of the second map with TPS and KPH being the axis

MAP + RPM + TPS + KPH = ooops, that's 4 dimensions

How do you do that on a 3 dimensional map?

:) cheers :D

Map 1 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map with MAP and RPM being the axis

Map 2 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map iwth TPS and RPM being the axis

Lookup Table 1 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map with VSS being the axis

MAP 1 - MAP 2 - Table 1 = final wastgate duty cycle.

Map 1 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map with MAP and RPM being the axis

Map 2 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map iwth TPS and RPM being the axis

Lookup Table 1 is wastegate solenoid duty cycle map with VSS being the axis

MAP 1 - MAP 2 - Table 1 = final wastgate duty cycle.

Since the VSS is on the driven wheels (I assume) how do you handle wheelspin?

Or do you take the VSS off the undriven wheels (if it's 2wd)?

Or do you use wheel speed splitter and use the lowest speed ie; hopefully the one without wheelspin?

:) cheers :D

SM2 runs multiple sensors, as it also has traction control, you can set the boost to run off the front or rears(although i dont know why you would)

Traction control via ABS wheel speed sensors is not what we are talking about.

On a circuit race car that method is pretty much useless as changes in power application, at the edge of the tyres' traction cirlce, affect the stability very drastically.

What we are discussing is limiting boost (and therefore power) using other inputs, ie; NOT traction control, because even with limited boost, the car can still have sufficient power to spin the wheels ie; lose traction.

:) cheers :D

Since the VSS is on the driven wheels (I assume) how do you handle wheelspin?

Or do you take the VSS off the undriven wheels (if it's 2wd)?

Or do you use wheel speed splitter and use the lowest speed ie; hopefully the one without wheelspin?

:) cheers :D

Would take a fair amount of tuning to get right. But if you wanted to get tricky you may be able to measure the differnce between front and rear wheel speed sensors and make that an axis. That way you would have:

1. Map1 Wastegate duty cycle with MAP and RPM as the axis.

2. MAP2 wstegate duty cycle with (difference in wheel speed) and RPM as the axis.

THat way you pull the boost out when there is a larger difference in front to rear wheel speeds.

We are actually the agents for racelogic traction control systems they work on wheel speed differntials and you can dial in the percentage slip allowed - very cool stuff, very expensive as well - as its used in formula 1.

cant wait to see this finished

looks like a top job, gonan be a maze of pipework too

cheers gents - i'm quite happy with the way the mounts came together. i learnt a LOT about supercharger drive systems from my last effort which was a shocker to say the least. this time i have very short belt lengths and everything is extremely rigid, both of which are critical to success. i have had it running with the pipes off and it all looks top notch straight off the bat. touch wood, i won't have alignment problems. i am particularly impressed with the compound drive system, i can take all the credit for it too because it was my idea!

stick welder, angle grinder and drill all the way!

sounds like a big angry bee with no outlet pipe on - very noisy indeed! pumps a lot more air at idle than the little SC-14 did too.

as you can see from the pics, the turbo outlet needs to do a sharp turn (bummer!) straight into the blower's inlet, which is on the rear face of the thing. the large square outlet needs to be merged into that 3 inch pipe before intercoolind and throttle body in the conventional manner. bypass gate goes on there too.

issues to still be addressed include heat shielding for the manifold and blower, piping, gate setup and tuning!

pity i'm broke as anything. should have a real job by the end of the year so that will help.

cubes: 550cc nismo squirters here ready to go in when the time comes.

more pics:

IMG_1108.jpg

IMG_1112.jpg

IMG_1114.jpg

concerns over the torque moment on the tensioner arm will be addressed if they become a problem with fatigue cracking etc. it's as stiff as i could imagine at the moment and i can't see it breaking anytime soon. time will tell!

fark you're quick off the mark tonight!

story goes that a few weeks ago i had a little oil leak from the front of the engine somewhere, took the timing cover off etc but couldn't find it. then assembled it all again and realised it was just the little blanking plate i'd made up for the extra oil drain hole leaking a bit, bolt had come loose.

anyway the car seemed to lose a whole lot of power after it, so i checked the timing again and it was 10 degrees retarded. oddly, it still ran pretty well, just lost power everywhere obviously. beforehand, the CAS had been pretty much in the middle of the tracking groove, but not afterwards? my only conclusion was that i put it back in on the wrong spline somehow, even though it has a keyway which should make this impossible.

anyway i re-timed it to 15 degrees and picked up about 80hp at the wheels (pants dyno) so i'm happy.

lol yes I was quick.. Only just got home, checked email and there you were. >_<

It looks as if your running the later style cas, being without the black center. The early model cas's run a half moon key so its either in or not.

Spline... so the late model doesn't run the usual half moon key?

it's a series 1 head if that means anything?

it has like 12 big spline ridges/valleys and a half moon key - unless the key is broken somehow? i should really have a look at it but i'm lazy and the timing is right so i don't care too much. knock sensing FTW.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...