Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got my heap of junk dynoed for a bit today, just a quick check to make sure it was OK. fixed the AFR's back to 12:1 and didn't play with timing much at all. total of 1.5 hours on the dyno, 225rwkw at 9psi. graph and stuff can be seen here --> http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=104332

Looks good stocky.. Any plans to get that s/c providing a little more boost in the low end?

Does anyone know the formula for working out what the compression ratio will be with a standard 30e block & r32 RB25DE head with a 1.0mm metal head gasket??

Simple high school maths (Pi x R2 X H), 0.2 mm reduction in head gasket thickness = 0.1 to 1 increase in compression ratio. So if you had no head gasket at all, you would end up at 8.7 to 1 using RB30E pistons with an RB25 cylinder head.

An alternative (if you have a decent machine shop close by) is to mill the cylinder head 0.3 mm and reduce the combustion chamber volume by 2 cc's. Then install new (unmilled) valve seats which will reduce the combustion chamber volume by 0.8 cc's. Head gaskets of 0.8 mm are available, but to use one you will need to o'ring the block. Do those 3 things and you will end up at 8.65 to 1 which is the best you are going to get while still retaining the standard squish, which is important.

:( cheers :(

Looks good stocky.. Any plans to get that s/c providing a little more boost in the low end?

nup - it's perfect just as it is. the boost isn't important, it's the airflow that it's providing. it REALLY doesn't need any more bottom-end torque that's for sure. full boost (on the street) is a little later than i was expecting, simply because it goes through the gears so quickly. there's just no time. it mashes first gear and you can destroy 2nd if you really want to . yet to drive it on a cold night :O

it needs to have the cam timing checked to see why the power is dropping off past 5200. hopefully it's just the timing and not something else. pretty f**king happy with it at the moment that's for sure. name me any other RB30 engine with that response, power delivery and peak power on such little boost. i can't think of any.

nup - it's perfect just as it is. the boost isn't important, it's the airflow that it's providing. it REALLY doesn't need any more bottom-end torque that's for sure. full boost (on the street) is a little later than i was expecting, simply because it goes through the gears so quickly. there's just no time. it mashes first gear and you can destroy 2nd if you really want to . yet to drive it on a cold night :O

it needs to have the cam timing checked to see why the power is dropping off past 5200. hopefully it's just the timing and not something else. pretty f**king happy with it at the moment that's for sure. name me any other RB30 engine with that response, power delivery and peak power on such little boost. i can't think of any.

Well thats just it, I haven't seen one... But I am greedy.. :(

You are pretty damn close to the same power I had with the rb20det turbo at 2400rpm but with a lot more top end.

I'm certian the issue is with cam timing as you have just disabled the vct and not adjusted the cam timing to suit yes?

I'm curious as to how its all setup.. I'm sure youve mentioned it before.

Where is the turbo's wastegate getting its boost reading from?

yeah VCT is disabled - but the cam timing is probably out due to the fact that it's a completely non-standard cam belt setup. i basically aligned the notches as best i could by eye, which wasn't very good at all.

DSC00174-1.jpg

as you can see the tensioners aren't in the "normal" place for an RB30DET, because i started with a series 1 block. i like my setup better though, the belts have less length between tension points so there's (theoretically) less flap in them.

turbo's wastegate is reading boost from before the intercooler, but this doesn't really matter. not much would change if i referenced it to the plenum, or after the intercooler. it might run 1-2psi more (pressure rise equal to pressure differential across the cooler) but that's it. the real magic is happening at the 2nd wastegate which is the blower bypass.

i really wish i had a dyno vid to show you guys, not because it looked cool but because of the noise it made. just insane.

As you have the turbo's wastegate boost feed after the supercharger wouldn't this essentially cause the turbo to lag as the supercharger will be making boost; IF the supercharger makes enough boost to hold the turbo's wastegate open then the turbo man never really get up on boost?

Is that right?

Have you tried taking the turbo wastegate boost feed from the compressor cover or at least the pipe that runs from the turbo to the supercharger?

totally true, except the supercharger doesn't make enough boost (straight away) to open the gate. it only makes 5psi on its own, with no positive inlet pressure.

if i took the gate's pressure feed from the turbo-blower connecting pipe, it would likely cause plenum pressure to go up to around 16psi, which i don't want. this is because the blower multiplies the pressure, not adds. so the pressure differential stays the same at, say, 1.4x, so you might only get 5psi out of the blower with no turbo hooked up. connect the turbo and pressurise the inlet, and the final figures might be something like 7psi from the blower and 2psi in the blower-turbo connecting pipe.

if i had to guess (haven't measured it yet), i would say that there is only 2-3psi of pressure in the connecting pipe at full boost. so there is certainly a *bit* left in the old GT40 :O

bah come on, yours would be heaps quicker from the info i've seen posted?

It sounds a lot more torquier than most with that supercharger - especially when compared to a mere rb25 like I have.

Can't wait to see how it goes with big injectors + big boost - you'll have some major traction issues!

Cheer

i think he has some major traction issues now...if he tried i reckon it could nail first three easy. That charger really seems to kick it in the ass down low to get it all started. It looks and sounds wild as from that video.

yeah it starts spinning 1st gear at about 3500rpm if you keep your foot down, then 2nd it will turn them again when you hit full boost :) shift too quickly like i did in the video and it's all over as far as the tyres are concerned. i'd love to do this to an RB25 to show you guys how easy it is to make huge power out of a twincharge. it would really transform a 2.5 litre engine that's for sure. even better would be a GTR that could cope with the power. the 3 litre bottom end helps a bit, but when you have boost delivery like i have it's not really necessary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got the four AN10 fitting welded up to the cam covers and started up making the head to sump breather/drain lines. The front passenger side cover I used a 45 up top and a 90 at the bottom into the stock VCT head drain spot (3/4" BPST to AN10 adapter) thats unused on the RB25DET NEO with some speedflow flame shield to protect it from the manifolds heat.   back passenger side was a 90 up top with some flame shield and 45 at the sump end. The rear drivers is 45 at both ends   the front drivers fitting is capped off for now but ready to go if i want to try moving the breathers around. I was told by the fabricator to leave all the welds raw for now to make sure there are no pin hole leaks. A lot of cleaning up, re bundling looms and degreasing to go as well as final assembly on the cam cover baffles. The first real test will be 28th March at a Circuit event. added complexity and more spots for leaks but overall looks relatively neat imo
    • Yeah i think the dash needs to come out. To get the loom or maybe just climate control and radio cluster. My mirrors are done i think the motors don’t work so well after flood haha i need the ac fan, you said you wanted to keep it for your 31 and interior loom not including boot. The wiper motor. I’m not sure how good the window surrounds are on the exterior on the pintara.  I will message you to get your bank details shortly 
    • Just another barrier put up to stop cars being modified. When we're all driving Chinese sewing machines, you won't want to modify it anyway, and you'll likely already have slashed your wrists and be locked up in a padded room for your own protection.
    • Yes, but no. I wouldn't want an IC7, because I think they are ugly, cramped and most of the displays I've seen are garish (and granted the last bit can probably be avoided). I wouldn't want to pay for the UC10. Probably wouldn't want to pay for the IC7, for that matter. And, it's an R32. I have cable drive speedo. Although, thinking about it, that's not a big obstacle, because at least I can throw the electronic sender back into the R33 box and then find a way to emulate the original (R32 or R33) speedo head's conversion of the saw-tooth AC speed signal into the square wave that the ECU wants, without the 1990s approach of hiding a gutted speedo head behind the dash. (another Arduino project, no doubt). I like the technical aspects of the big digital dashes, but I aesthetically and just general originality and feel-wise, like the original dash enough. More? Yes, more. If I had a UC10 I'd want to make the dash look as close to the original one as possible most of the time, and only flash up "DANGER TO MANIFOLD" when it needed to. But the other aspect of the 3-DIN slot digi gauge that I'm contemplating is that I'm a tinkerer and can barely resist a project, even if I don't need to add another to the list of unfinished ones. And I think there's enough precedent of others out there that have proven which equipment works (ie, is not washed out, or slow, or prone to failure, or all the other problems that can afflict such a project). I'm not quite enough of a micro-controller tech head that I know the best way to approach all of these decisions, and so striking out on my own to achieve it years ago would have led to unhappiness. But now, it seems like a project that I can actually achieve on the first or second go, with only a few sleepless nights. And that's why I'm actively thinking about it now. I would much rather have a thing in my car that I made from more-or-less scratch that does what I want, rather than something that someone else made that does some of what I want, not other stuff I want, and/or annoys me in some fashion. If I'm going to be annoyed, I need it to be my fault, so I know who to blame, and who needs to fix it. As an example of that - I have surveillance cameras at home. No, I did not go buy a kit with a DVR and 4 or 8 or 16 off-the-shelf cameras in a kit. No, I did not want to use any sort of could service to record or access the feeds and recordings from outside the house. No, I bought my chosen cameras directly (from China, lol) and built the DVR myself using a couple of different (ie, this was attempt 1 and attempt 2 to get a system I liked) software packages, running on Linux, with the server being a virtual machine running Proxmox. I found a way to offload the image recognition part of the system to a dedicated AI processing board (a Coral TPU, for anyone who cares) with the hardware passed through to the server on the VM, motion detection offloaded to the GPU, all storage is local in the home network, accessible from outside via my own self-hosted VPN). All done so that I could seal off the Chinese cameras in their own network where they can't access the internet and dial home to the CCP and backdoor my network. All things that you can't have if you do what is commercially available. And even with all the f**king around it has still cost a fraction of what it would cost to buy commercially.
    • ..could be worse... but out here, renting private affords some luxuries ...we've even been told the Sept dateline isn't critical, and I'd rather move stuff in the cool of winter, than slogging it out in the heat. Recall we were talking about the million dollar view this place has?...that's what he got for it... (won't be so nice when the quarry happens at the back in the future...lol..)... ...cool, I'll stick the wiper motor in a wee box...umm.... the pinny is GLX trim ~ I think that's about as close as it gets to Silo spec when it comes to the S2 pinny...ie; electric mirrors etc etc...dunno about the trip computer/wiring...I do electronics repair, I'd be willing to take a look at it for you. As you saw, all the dash is there in that car..and thinking about it, it'd be easier to pull the whole center section out, rather than just the ashtray and rails, but your call...
×
×
  • Create New...