Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanx for that VHR32, awsome site. but i dont know any of teh following values.

head is rb25det VVT out of r33.

Enter Bore/Stroke Designation Type

2 = Millimeters =2

Enter Cylinder Bore Size =86.5mm

Enter Piston Stroke Length =85mm

Enter Head Gasket Bore Diameter =87mm

Enter Compressed Head Gasket Thickness =1.5mm

Enter Combustion Chamber Volume In CCs =RB25=62.5cc

Enter Piston Dome Volume In CCs Negative For Dished Pistons (Use '-') = ?? RB30E = -0.97cc dish ??

= 7.6:1

EDIT: This was worked out with a RB30E bottom end in mind because you posted it in the RB30DET thread, not your RB25 engine.

Edited by VHR32
RB25 gasket if you have a R33 RB25 VCT head.

RB26 or RB30 gasket if you have R32 RB25 or RB26 head

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :) - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :D - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

ok, I added the RB25 gasket. I thought the others would be more common and cheaper to use so I left it out...

I put in 86.5, 85, 87 HG bore, 1.2 HG height, 65cc for RB26 (was a guess, some say they are 70cc? although CP measured some at 64.5cc avg) and 13cc dome.

= 9.12

Im picking up my RB26 head later today so i'll have to measure the cc's!

I have seen RB26 combustion chambers vary between 63.8 cc's and 64.7 cc's. So 64.5 cc's is OK for a rough calculation, but you should carefully measure the actual head and each combustion chamber.

:ninja: Cheers :yes:

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

Ash.. unsure if you read the whole post in the dyno thread but a peak of 256rwkw was seen on 15psi.

A little more boost and and tidying up of afr's and ign saw 270rwkw. And no adj. cam gears.

Forget the exh. manifold. The plenum is what definitely appears to open up the top end. Then as Shaun said you hit 300-330rwkw on the stock exh. manifold and you then 'need' to go aftermarket.

So for the price of my pistons and rods i could have had one of these motors ready to slot into my car ... fark im silly for being so stubborn with regards to wanting to be different :D

Can still be done Troy! :P

Head down to the wreckers and invest a hundred or two in a good second hand rb30.

I bought my bottom end that came out of a running car that was still in great condition (had been arse ended) for $150.

yes short runners.

I think the slight drop in mid range is probably the almost 2psi drop that was seen with the new plenum.

Prior boost was almost 10psi then tailed off to 8. After the plenum it sat on a steady 8psi through out. Not sure why it was playing about prior.

Interestingly there was no noticeable drop in off boost low rpm torque.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
    • So, when are you trying the new GR86 or BRZ?
    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC IAT is measured under the blower hat I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
×
×
  • Create New...