Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanx for that VHR32, awsome site. but i dont know any of teh following values.

head is rb25det VVT out of r33.

Enter Bore/Stroke Designation Type

2 = Millimeters =2

Enter Cylinder Bore Size =86.5mm

Enter Piston Stroke Length =85mm

Enter Head Gasket Bore Diameter =87mm

Enter Compressed Head Gasket Thickness =1.5mm

Enter Combustion Chamber Volume In CCs =RB25=62.5cc

Enter Piston Dome Volume In CCs Negative For Dished Pistons (Use '-') = ?? RB30E = -0.97cc dish ??

= 7.6:1

EDIT: This was worked out with a RB30E bottom end in mind because you posted it in the RB30DET thread, not your RB25 engine.

Edited by VHR32
RB25 gasket if you have a R33 RB25 VCT head.

RB26 or RB30 gasket if you have R32 RB25 or RB26 head

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :) - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :D - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

ok, I added the RB25 gasket. I thought the others would be more common and cheaper to use so I left it out...

I put in 86.5, 85, 87 HG bore, 1.2 HG height, 65cc for RB26 (was a guess, some say they are 70cc? although CP measured some at 64.5cc avg) and 13cc dome.

= 9.12

Im picking up my RB26 head later today so i'll have to measure the cc's!

I have seen RB26 combustion chambers vary between 63.8 cc's and 64.7 cc's. So 64.5 cc's is OK for a rough calculation, but you should carefully measure the actual head and each combustion chamber.

:ninja: Cheers :yes:

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

Ash.. unsure if you read the whole post in the dyno thread but a peak of 256rwkw was seen on 15psi.

A little more boost and and tidying up of afr's and ign saw 270rwkw. And no adj. cam gears.

Forget the exh. manifold. The plenum is what definitely appears to open up the top end. Then as Shaun said you hit 300-330rwkw on the stock exh. manifold and you then 'need' to go aftermarket.

So for the price of my pistons and rods i could have had one of these motors ready to slot into my car ... fark im silly for being so stubborn with regards to wanting to be different :D

Can still be done Troy! :P

Head down to the wreckers and invest a hundred or two in a good second hand rb30.

I bought my bottom end that came out of a running car that was still in great condition (had been arse ended) for $150.

yes short runners.

I think the slight drop in mid range is probably the almost 2psi drop that was seen with the new plenum.

Prior boost was almost 10psi then tailed off to 8. After the plenum it sat on a steady 8psi through out. Not sure why it was playing about prior.

Interestingly there was no noticeable drop in off boost low rpm torque.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm keen for this content to 😂
    • Hi All, I'm based in Sydney and want to get hold of 4 stock R34 GTT wheel caps as pictured. Cheers
    • Haha im flattered! Although my poor boat is collecting dust in the garage, as it hasn’t been driven in like 6 months. I forgot the to put the trickle charger on too, so the battery is likely toast now.. I have the frenchys kit. It is fantastic. My only gripe was that the hard lines from the firewall needed some tweaking, however, this was mainly due to my specific turbo and dump combo. The weight and size packaging is much nicer too. I think I have some pics on my build thread somewhere.. my justification for the kit was more “why not” I had gone to the trouble to modernise just about every other part of the car..
    • Actually, ethanol has probably never been cheaper, on a tax free basis, than petrol. With fuel excise being what it is, and only being levied on the hydocarbon component, not the ethanol component, and ethanol for non-drinking purposes not being subject to liquor excise - E85 was cheaper, but not because the combustible liquid itself was particularly cheaper.
    • Maybe? If changing the cat to a higher flowing cat, caused the turbo to spool more quickly, and those areas of the map had not been tuned for the boost level it is now seeing, then yes you would need a re-tune. How dangerous it is running without the updated tune would depend on how far out the tune is with the now higher boost levels, how the engine protection has been setup, is the ECU compensating with a wideband sensor, is the boost control closed loop blah blah million other things... But yeah having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if changing out the cat for a high flow, in say a full 3" exhaust, made no noticeable difference at all. 
×
×
  • Create New...