Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just had another look at the guide, it talks about grinding fins off the sump on the RB26 to accomodate the longer throw. Can anyone please provide further explanation or a pic - the engine builder measured it all up and can't see where the interference might be; I was there when he did it and I'm not sure either.

Cheers

I too just noticed I included the rb26 in to the list.

I'm certain you don't have to do this with the 26 as they run a sump adapter that is a good 15-20mm or what ever it is + I can't remember if the 26 sump did have the scrapers in place, no doubt they do though.

The Rb20/25 sump most definitely.

I too just noticed I included the rb26 in to the list.

I'm certain you don't have to do this with the 26 as they run a sump adapter that is a good 15-20mm or what ever it is + I can't remember if the 26 sump did have the scrapers in place, no doubt they do though.

The Rb20/25 sump most definitely.

Adapter plates are only about 10mm. Speaking of scrapers, I think you've hit on something there (no pun intended). In a previous post I asked if people adapt them to the RB30 girdle and it seems generally not. Thinking about it now, I reckon there's a chance they would hit the rods anyway but can't be sure as we didn't use scrapers either. From memory when we checked the clearance carefully, at BDC the rod comes down to about the same level as the girdle, and there's significant clearance between the bottom of the girdle and the closest part of the sump.

The Rb26/30 adapter plates are 10mm. I havnt used the scraper plates in my motor, and as discussed earlier, if u drill and tap (u'll also need to countersink the girdle for the little washers welded to the plates) you'll prolly just weaken the girdle. An alternative is to get a custom girdle made, i'm able to do them, but dont have the funds unless otheres were interested in one aswell.

Ok guys, im on a cleaning mission.

So far i've chopped about 120 posts from the thread, maybe a few more.

So im aiming to cut this thread down by at the least 500 posts, if not get it under 4000 total :wave:

It'll probably take me the best part of a month i reckon.

So form here on in, please ensure you have read the thread/searched as if you ask a question... you post might well go missing as i havent got time to PM each person as i remove thier post if it was asked/previously answered. :woot:

Cheers -Ash

when putting my new engine together i had a mental blank about where the idler goes on my block so i looked on my laptop and found a rb30 guide (one of the first releases like 2 years old) and got the info i needed to get the belt on properly...

Guide gets another thumbs up!

Just confirming peoples oppinions on how to mod the VCT appropriatly with a few pics :)

thanks guys

Correct, you will need to screw a 1/8 bsp to -3 fitting into the head, then a -3 90deg hose end onto that to clear the timing belt, then make sure you fit a 1mm restrictor to the other end of the hose where it T's into the oil pressue sender(Thats what i do anyway)

cheers mate :)

Correct, you will need to screw a 1/8 bsp to -3 fitting into the head, then a -3 90deg hose end onto that to clear the timing belt, then make sure you fit a 1mm restrictor to the other end of the hose where it T's into the oil pressue sender(Thats what i do anyway)

Hey guys Ive bought the belt T306 and it fits fine with the second tensioner in the standard position and leaves safe amount of room between the gap. Although i cant line up both cams in their exact position where marked on the backing plate while having the crank at TDC. One of the cam gears has to sit 3/4 of a tooth advanced/retarded. Or you could just have them both out a little bit.

Looks like you have to have at least one adjustable cam gear to use this belt to have perfect timming alignment on the engine.

Anyone else have the same issue when fitting this belt?

Oh, and because its an audi belt repco try'd to sting me $190 big ones... still $115 at trade price is prety deer!

just for information im running an rb20e sump on my rb30e and it cleared fine with no problems fin wise.

am also interested in hearing that its a bit out timing wise with that belt.

so cubes guide has a differently positioned tensioner and this one uses the same tensioner however the cams are out of alignment???

SirRacer..

Its possible the rb30e sump is the same as the rb20e sump. If not then it may spin over by hand fine but be a little noise once the motors started. :D

Regarding the positioned tensioner..

I used 2 tensioners and the gates belt that was ~$30.

Everything lined up perfectly, I know 3 other RB's here in SA that have used the same method, I've seen only 2 of them with their covers off and both have lined up perfectly.

Are you looking at it at eye level? Not doing so will have it looking out.

I've got pics of my own if you wish to see how spot on it all lines up.

Regarding the positioned tensioner..

I used 2 tensioners and the gates belt that was ~$30.

Everything lined up perfectly, I know 3 other RB's here in SA that have used the same method, I've seen only 2 of them with their covers off and both have lined up perfectly.

Are you looking at it at eye level? Not doing so will have it looking out.

I've got pics of my own if you wish to see how spot on it all lines up.

I thought the Gates belt had a problem with the tooth profile? Did you use the stock or high/low tensioner configuration on yours?

Ive had abit of a play and persisted with it but i managed to get good tension with only a pifteenth of advance on the cam wheels... The engine is on a stand so im looking at it directly front on.

I just spoke to my tuner/mechanic and he said serlong as its a fraction advanced and not retarted it should be fine.

I'm happy with where the belt is sitting now after talking to him and dont think i need an adjustable cam gear at this stage see how it go's once its running!

I thought the Gates belt had a problem with the tooth profile? Did you use the stock or high/low tensioner configuration on yours?

Sorry, it was the dayco belt I used lol. Its been close to 2years and I haven't looked at the guide for some time. :D

I used the usual high/low tensioner config. Both were tensioners as to obtain the correct belt tension.

the rb30e sump is slightly deeper than the rb20e sump. my engine went into a cefiro and we needed the space as the 30 sump would have hit the crossmember

my brother overfilled the engine and i can report than an rb30 can hold more than 10 litres :-)

OK, So i have a rb30 DE block, but obviously dont want to use the pistons, as ill burn them and throw a rod under high boost, so my question is.

Not unless your pushing mid 20psi and over 300rwkw. The stock items provided the car is tuned well hangs in there without problems. Detonation.... And you will crack ring lands.

There's one bloke thats been pushing 373rwkw through his rb30 bottom end thats running stock rods but precision hyperutetic pistons with a rev limit ~7000rpm. He mentioned not to go ACL hyperutetic pistons as they are not so good at high power levels.

So they are definitely tough motors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...