Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah they finally released it, actually useful data for once

pitty it needs to much damn turbine speed to get anything useful from it

whats a realistic rpm we are talking to get a 0.70 a/r housing fast enough to make the compressor flow 1.5 bar. is there a way to mathematically work this out?

given that we know required turbine speed and pressure ratio ?

72% efficiency for 65 lbs/min of airflow for 1.5 bar boost at just under 100,000 rpm is pretty damn good.

A ball bearing turbo will last forever at those sorts of loads.

The only turbine map I have seen is for the 0.84.

t04zturbine.gif

:P cheers :D

i think we figured out why ours isnt holding boost. To do with a lack of backpressure in our exhaust system now haha. So yeh..hopefully find out in a day or so if the fix will work.

Spoolup...what manifold are you running again? Is it one of Kyles? Ok so i just backchecked last page...and you do run one of kyles. Well i just got back from seeing kyle at Mercury before. With our situation, because we put a 4" system on now there is virtually no backpressure whatsoever and because his manifolds are so efficient and now our exhaust system is super efficient, the exhaust gas is bypassing the wastegate completely as soon as gas velocity starts to skyrocket. Kyles fix, for us atleast, is to modify the rear housing so the wastegate is mounted straight off the turbines feed so exhaust gas is forced into the wastegate and cannot bypass thus letting us control boost pressure perfectly. Ive got a modified housing with me now, which will go on tomorrow hopefully or asap and we will know how it goes, but im highly confident it will fix the problem.

Unfortunately I dont think that will fix your problem Spoolup. :)

Edited by r33_racer

Hey all. You may of covered this already but 241 pages is alot to read lol. What crank is everyone running on the conversion. I found out today my the crank i got with my rb30 block is no good. Do you think its worth the money and finding a performance crank or just put my money elsewhere go find another crank from the wreckers and just get it checked over?

Hey all. You may of covered this already but 241 pages is alot to read lol. What crank is everyone running on the conversion. I found out today my the crank i got with my rb30 block is no good. Do you think its worth the money and finding a performance crank or just put my money elsewhere go find another crank from the wreckers and just get it checked over?

Hi pal, depends what you want out of your engine.

stock rb30 should be fine. Thats what i'm using for my build.

simon

yeah funny enough I was talking to Kyle today about my problem also, he said he had a 60mm hks gate like mine there that had a 3mm gap between the valve and the seat, and it was new. So Ill put some plasticine on the seat and put the gate back on, then pull it apart to see if the valve is actually seating on the seat ( it should have approx 1 mm of preload ).

Oh the joy of it all :-)

i think we figured out why ours isnt holding boost. To do with a lack of backpressure in our exhaust system now haha. So yeh..hopefully find out in a day or so if the fix will work.

Spoolup...what manifold are you running again? Is it one of Kyles? Ok so i just backchecked last page...and you do run one of kyles. Well i just got back from seeing kyle at Mercury before. With our situation, because we put a 4" system on now there is virtually no backpressure whatsoever and because his manifolds are so efficient and now our exhaust system is super efficient, the exhaust gas is bypassing the wastegate completely as soon as gas velocity starts to skyrocket. Kyles fix, for us atleast, is to modify the rear housing so the wastegate is mounted straight off the turbines feed so exhaust gas is forced into the wastegate and cannot bypass thus letting us control boost pressure perfectly. Ive got a modified housing with me now, which will go on tomorrow hopefully or asap and we will know how it goes, but im highly confident it will fix the problem.

Unfortunately I dont think that will fix your problem Spoolup. :)

ok sweet thats what ill end up doing just with a different crank pulley. does anyone have any info on the oil gallery in the head i have to weld up. Or something about mods i have to do to make the vct work

Here are some photos of kyles manifold, it shows the wastegate pipe setup. These are for Sky30 more so, but it may be of some interest to everyone else.

post-12828-1171275812.jpg

post-12828-1171275835.jpg

post-12828-1171275851.jpg

post-12828-1171275971.jpg

post-12828-1171280712.jpg Just for you cubes :D

Edited by r33_racer

Interesting.. Kyle has gone all out with preventing reversion.

Very nice exhaust manifold. I have never seen the collector of one.

Awesome Pics. Thanks. :D

You didn't grab any of directly down the throat of the collector did you? :laugh:

ok guys, just finished dummy fitting the engine in the engine bay, what a farking task, as its been out for about 8 months now.

Ok its in and sitting on the engine mounts, however, the front is sticking up in the air far too much, and the bonnet is no wear near closing. I'm using the std RB26 engine mounts, and i've tried to fit them and the rb30 ones in all sort of combo's but the only ones that fit r the std rb26 ones. I had a quick look underneath, and it seems to me that part of the sump, is resting on the cross member, has anyone dealt with an rb26/30 in a gtr before? Oh and in regards to if the dumps clear the firewall, yes they did, only just however, as i've removed the aircon, the drain pipe that comes out of the firewall was removed, and the dumps JUST fitted down there, i had to force it a bit to get the pass. engine mount in the hole, but it fits.

heres the pics i took:

Picture003.jpg

Picture002.jpg

Picture001.jpg

Hi Shane, not sure what's going on there. Cross member clearance shouldn't be a problem, the deck height is increased at the upper end of the block from the top of the water pump upwards. And the bonnet should well and truly close if you can fit a strut brace under there, the're a lot higher than 38mm above the cam covers. The engine is supposed to be on a bit of an angle but the clearance should still be good. Try looking on the GTROC UK site for comparison pics

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/52458-rb...ight=r32+combat

at the risk of stating the obvious it seems that the whole engine is tilted way to far up at the front and that's what is causing the sump to hit at the rear.

Hi Shane, not sure what's going on there. Cross member clearance shouldn't be a problem, the deck height is increased at the upper end of the block from the top of the water pump upwards. And the bonnet should well and truly close if you can fit a strut brace under there, the're a lot higher than 38mm above the cam covers. The engine is supposed to be on a bit of an angle but the clearance should still be good. Try looking on the GTROC UK site for comparison pics

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/52458-rb...ight=r32+combat

at the risk of stating the obvious it seems that the whole engine is tilted way to far up at the front and that's what is causing the sump to hit at the rear.

The GTR/GTS4's run a block/sump adaptot plate so it also lowers the sump down slightly.

Anotonys GTS4, everything is VERY close. The bonnet had to be cut as the cam belt cover was touching.

This is so farked. I have an RB26 bottom end with Eagle rods ready to go with an RB25DE head when i find one. I was planning on using a 3076R 56trim with the HKS manifold and wastegate i have. I also have SKY30's old Apexi cams.

NOW, here is the problem. I thought a 3076R with 2.6L would be very puncy. But on the weekend i went in an RB25 with 270rwkws from a HKS GT-RS, headwork and Proncams. I was expecting it to have more grunt and pull.

Now my problem is i was planning on using a turbo bigger then the GT-RS and i now doubt i will get what i want from the RB26. :laugh:

I have looked through the RB30 results and i cant see anyone using a 3076R on an RB30. Can anyone point me in the direction of an RB30 with a similar setup so i can get an idea of the mid range it will have?

Troymeister,

This is an old dyno sheet i've kept since the early rb30det days.

I believe it was a GT3040 .82 running 1bar. Both were tuned to optimal afr's and ignition, std plenum nice ext gate hotside.

I believe it was this bloke that later went the gt35r .82, he said he's never looked back. I've actually had a couple tell me that. GT30r to GT35r and never looked back.

For the track I really think the GT35r .82 is a really nice match. I'm going a GT35r .82 with the xr6 .5 comp cover, as suggested by the local turbo bloke (ATS). It should be good for up to around 350rwkw. Why the .5, well I suggested it and he said most definitely, it improves streetability without killing top end for the power levels you are looking at.

Also.. Antony's Rb30DET gt35r .82exh .7comp. Loaded up on the brake I saw 15psi by a shade over 3000rpm!! I was quite impressed. Its slowly being all sorted and turning in to an awesome package. As should mine be after I stop this damn mig wire sticking to the item I'm welding. :laugh:

post-382-1171361925.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...