Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah they finally released it, actually useful data for once

pitty it needs to much damn turbine speed to get anything useful from it

whats a realistic rpm we are talking to get a 0.70 a/r housing fast enough to make the compressor flow 1.5 bar. is there a way to mathematically work this out?

given that we know required turbine speed and pressure ratio ?

72% efficiency for 65 lbs/min of airflow for 1.5 bar boost at just under 100,000 rpm is pretty damn good.

A ball bearing turbo will last forever at those sorts of loads.

The only turbine map I have seen is for the 0.84.

t04zturbine.gif

:P cheers :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we figured out why ours isnt holding boost. To do with a lack of backpressure in our exhaust system now haha. So yeh..hopefully find out in a day or so if the fix will work.

Spoolup...what manifold are you running again? Is it one of Kyles? Ok so i just backchecked last page...and you do run one of kyles. Well i just got back from seeing kyle at Mercury before. With our situation, because we put a 4" system on now there is virtually no backpressure whatsoever and because his manifolds are so efficient and now our exhaust system is super efficient, the exhaust gas is bypassing the wastegate completely as soon as gas velocity starts to skyrocket. Kyles fix, for us atleast, is to modify the rear housing so the wastegate is mounted straight off the turbines feed so exhaust gas is forced into the wastegate and cannot bypass thus letting us control boost pressure perfectly. Ive got a modified housing with me now, which will go on tomorrow hopefully or asap and we will know how it goes, but im highly confident it will fix the problem.

Unfortunately I dont think that will fix your problem Spoolup. :)

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all. You may of covered this already but 241 pages is alot to read lol. What crank is everyone running on the conversion. I found out today my the crank i got with my rb30 block is no good. Do you think its worth the money and finding a performance crank or just put my money elsewhere go find another crank from the wreckers and just get it checked over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all. You may of covered this already but 241 pages is alot to read lol. What crank is everyone running on the conversion. I found out today my the crank i got with my rb30 block is no good. Do you think its worth the money and finding a performance crank or just put my money elsewhere go find another crank from the wreckers and just get it checked over?

Hi pal, depends what you want out of your engine.

stock rb30 should be fine. Thats what i'm using for my build.

simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah funny enough I was talking to Kyle today about my problem also, he said he had a 60mm hks gate like mine there that had a 3mm gap between the valve and the seat, and it was new. So Ill put some plasticine on the seat and put the gate back on, then pull it apart to see if the valve is actually seating on the seat ( it should have approx 1 mm of preload ).

Oh the joy of it all :-)

i think we figured out why ours isnt holding boost. To do with a lack of backpressure in our exhaust system now haha. So yeh..hopefully find out in a day or so if the fix will work.

Spoolup...what manifold are you running again? Is it one of Kyles? Ok so i just backchecked last page...and you do run one of kyles. Well i just got back from seeing kyle at Mercury before. With our situation, because we put a 4" system on now there is virtually no backpressure whatsoever and because his manifolds are so efficient and now our exhaust system is super efficient, the exhaust gas is bypassing the wastegate completely as soon as gas velocity starts to skyrocket. Kyles fix, for us atleast, is to modify the rear housing so the wastegate is mounted straight off the turbines feed so exhaust gas is forced into the wastegate and cannot bypass thus letting us control boost pressure perfectly. Ive got a modified housing with me now, which will go on tomorrow hopefully or asap and we will know how it goes, but im highly confident it will fix the problem.

Unfortunately I dont think that will fix your problem Spoolup. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some photos of kyles manifold, it shows the wastegate pipe setup. These are for Sky30 more so, but it may be of some interest to everyone else.

post-12828-1171275812.jpg

post-12828-1171275835.jpg

post-12828-1171275851.jpg

post-12828-1171275971.jpg

post-12828-1171280712.jpg Just for you cubes :D

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.. Kyle has gone all out with preventing reversion.

Very nice exhaust manifold. I have never seen the collector of one.

Awesome Pics. Thanks. :D

You didn't grab any of directly down the throat of the collector did you? :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok guys, just finished dummy fitting the engine in the engine bay, what a farking task, as its been out for about 8 months now.

Ok its in and sitting on the engine mounts, however, the front is sticking up in the air far too much, and the bonnet is no wear near closing. I'm using the std RB26 engine mounts, and i've tried to fit them and the rb30 ones in all sort of combo's but the only ones that fit r the std rb26 ones. I had a quick look underneath, and it seems to me that part of the sump, is resting on the cross member, has anyone dealt with an rb26/30 in a gtr before? Oh and in regards to if the dumps clear the firewall, yes they did, only just however, as i've removed the aircon, the drain pipe that comes out of the firewall was removed, and the dumps JUST fitted down there, i had to force it a bit to get the pass. engine mount in the hole, but it fits.

heres the pics i took:

Picture003.jpg

Picture002.jpg

Picture001.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Shane, not sure what's going on there. Cross member clearance shouldn't be a problem, the deck height is increased at the upper end of the block from the top of the water pump upwards. And the bonnet should well and truly close if you can fit a strut brace under there, the're a lot higher than 38mm above the cam covers. The engine is supposed to be on a bit of an angle but the clearance should still be good. Try looking on the GTROC UK site for comparison pics

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/52458-rb...ight=r32+combat

at the risk of stating the obvious it seems that the whole engine is tilted way to far up at the front and that's what is causing the sump to hit at the rear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Shane, not sure what's going on there. Cross member clearance shouldn't be a problem, the deck height is increased at the upper end of the block from the top of the water pump upwards. And the bonnet should well and truly close if you can fit a strut brace under there, the're a lot higher than 38mm above the cam covers. The engine is supposed to be on a bit of an angle but the clearance should still be good. Try looking on the GTROC UK site for comparison pics

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/52458-rb...ight=r32+combat

at the risk of stating the obvious it seems that the whole engine is tilted way to far up at the front and that's what is causing the sump to hit at the rear.

The GTR/GTS4's run a block/sump adaptot plate so it also lowers the sump down slightly.

Anotonys GTS4, everything is VERY close. The bonnet had to be cut as the cam belt cover was touching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is so farked. I have an RB26 bottom end with Eagle rods ready to go with an RB25DE head when i find one. I was planning on using a 3076R 56trim with the HKS manifold and wastegate i have. I also have SKY30's old Apexi cams.

NOW, here is the problem. I thought a 3076R with 2.6L would be very puncy. But on the weekend i went in an RB25 with 270rwkws from a HKS GT-RS, headwork and Proncams. I was expecting it to have more grunt and pull.

Now my problem is i was planning on using a turbo bigger then the GT-RS and i now doubt i will get what i want from the RB26. :laugh:

I have looked through the RB30 results and i cant see anyone using a 3076R on an RB30. Can anyone point me in the direction of an RB30 with a similar setup so i can get an idea of the mid range it will have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Troymeister,

This is an old dyno sheet i've kept since the early rb30det days.

I believe it was a GT3040 .82 running 1bar. Both were tuned to optimal afr's and ignition, std plenum nice ext gate hotside.

I believe it was this bloke that later went the gt35r .82, he said he's never looked back. I've actually had a couple tell me that. GT30r to GT35r and never looked back.

For the track I really think the GT35r .82 is a really nice match. I'm going a GT35r .82 with the xr6 .5 comp cover, as suggested by the local turbo bloke (ATS). It should be good for up to around 350rwkw. Why the .5, well I suggested it and he said most definitely, it improves streetability without killing top end for the power levels you are looking at.

Also.. Antony's Rb30DET gt35r .82exh .7comp. Loaded up on the brake I saw 15psi by a shade over 3000rpm!! I was quite impressed. Its slowly being all sorted and turning in to an awesome package. As should mine be after I stop this damn mig wire sticking to the item I'm welding. :laugh:

post-382-1171361925.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm pretty sure it's just this specific Dorman one. I checked it with the hub by itself and even then it was already shedding plastic. It's only once I ran into all these issues with assembling the clutch that I decided to be skeptical of the plastic alignment tool as well and found it to have a notable amount of slop as the clutch is heavy enough to allow the plastic to bend. 
    • The "one cylinder is 160 while others is 180" part of the compression test sounds bad. That's 12% lower than the others. I would bet something has happened there.
    • Does it do it at light throttle as well as high throttle opening? Only large throttle opening? If the answer is "No, it doesn't do it at light throttle opening", then (part of) the answer is as it has always been. Don't stamp on the throttle at low revs. Open is with some discretion. Roll into it. Now, because it's not a turbo, it shouldn't demand the highest octane fuel....but even 91 MON (equivalent to ~95 RON in the metric world) is only so-so for NA Jap engines. The 10% ethanol won't make any difference forwards or backwards. 10% is just filler. OK, actually, it is a little bit bad. Ethanol adds some (effectively) free octane. It allows the blend to reach the 91 octane rating without the petrol it is mixed with being that high octane to start with. But ethanol needs less air to burn than petrol does. So when a blend has ethanol in it, the fuel-air mix will always be a bit lean (except when running in closed loop cruise where the O2 sensor will add fuel to bring the stoichiometry back to target). When yo stamp on the throttle, you are not in closed loop and so a lean condition may well exist. Lean can (and will) cause pinging. The low compression cylinder may be a concern. If the rings (and in particular the oil control ring) are poor, and it is ingesting oil into that cylinder, that can cause it to ping. Oil reduces the effective octane rating of the fuel that is squirted into that cylinder, and rattle rattle rattle is the result. It's unlikely to be a bad MAF. You should make sure that the harmonic balancer is not in the process of failing. The outer hub can slip around relative to the inner. This makes the timing marks on it wrong. If you set the timing to a target, as read with a timing light from those marks, then the timing can be very wrong. You need to take out #1 spark plug and use a screwdriver or similar rod as an indicator and turn the engine over (which will be easier with all the plugs out) by hand so that you can see the screwdriver rise up, dwell around TDC and start falling again. It is difficult for the uninitiated to accurately find TDC that way, but it will do in a pinch. When you are pretty sure you know where TDC is, you need to check the timing marks. If it is not real bloody close to TDC, then you have to question the health of the balancer. Another thing that can go wrong is carbon build up on piston crowns or on the combustion chamber face of the head. These can glow hot and cause pre-ignition, and will tend to do it on light throttle as well as heavy.
    • Hello again so I blew my motor long story short one of the cams journals wasn’t getting oil and the cam stopped rotating and jumped timing on exhaust side. It’s a built r32 rb25de+t non vct so my questions are. 1. Can a r33 rb25det s1 head work on my r32 rb25de non vct block I still want to use it because forged internals. My r32 rb25 head is toast and I can’t find anyone with one. 2. Will my non vct parts work on the vct head which are cam gears, gear back plate, front gear cover, cas, cas bracket, and cams (rb20 tomei 256 cams). I will be deleting the vct because I don’t feel like it lol also I reached my hp goal on the dyno before it blew.   3.Last question I know I’ll have to switch up my manifold and fuel rail because no vct head is very similar to rb20 and ik vct head is different but I want to make sure that tps, water sensors, and idle air control valve connectors will be the same. I’ve read tps and water sensors should be the same just don’t know about the idle air control. I don’t want to have to modify my harness.   
×
×
  • Create New...