Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

John, nothing in particular as far as the actual intended compression ratios. Build it for what you want to get from it. Easier to drive more average power and more responsive but less peak power go hi comp, dyno queen go low comp with peaky massive turbo :)

Mark (Scooby) that should be decent, but my 26 made 260 on the stock computer. Go back for refund or more power. :huh: Good luck after run in.

Steve the cams and I understand crank angle sensor are different but all else is the same. I see you are racing at the "Bank". Let us know next time you run and I'll round up the boys from the Switch to come watch and ponder just why anyone would be so silly with a 120 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In for sure Geoff, Havnt seen that 120 ynot out their to date. Should be an interesting toy.

On the oil pump issue, I went the Jun not for the High volume flow but simply because it is touted as a stronger more reliable pump than the N1. Also did the collar deal as extra insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve the cams and I understand crank angle sensor are different but all else is the same. I see you are racing at the "Bank". Let us know next time you run and I'll round up the boys from the Switch to come watch and ponder just why anyone would be so silly with a 120 :huh:

AHAHAHA I sure will Geoff, and thanks... I think my mate is crazy fitting a 2JZ into a HR Holden and expecting to come away from Summernats in one piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK here's a question for the airflow gurus, Geoff that means you. :nyaanyaa:

The 26/30 will not allow use of the standard airbox in the R32 GTR easily. Obvious choice is to use pods but extra height of the RB30 makes it quite difficult to accomodate pods with any kind of meaningful airbox.

I'm thinking of feeding both AFMs by having them draw air from the back of one big arse pod filter, which could be accomodated by cutting a hole in the area immediately below the airbox.

The filter area would be ample, and construction of the airbox would be relatively easy. If you look on the SSS Automotive website you'll see that their blue Improved Production car runs this type of system.

Any thoughts / ideas on this approach?

Edited by Scooby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use that location for my air filter but there are problems.

When it rains or the road is wet the spray can be taken up, and that sends the AFMs into error as the ECU thinks they are maxing out. The right thing to do then is box it correctly to remove the spray from the NSF tyre from the problem. I'm yet to examine the effects from following closely a car putting up serious spray.

Also the location is very dirty due to the tyre proximity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use that location for my air filter but there are problems.

When it rains or the road is wet the spray can be taken up, and that sends the AFMs into error as the ECU thinks they are maxing out. The right thing to do then is box it correctly to remove the spray from the NSF tyre from the problem. I'm yet to examine the effects from following closely a car putting up serious spray.

Also the location is very dirty due to the tyre proximity.

Due to the plastic wheel arch guard I'm not sure what the problem would be from NSF tyre? I can see that on the 32 GTR there would be an issue with spray coming in through the vent in the front bar but I'd counter that by making a shield.

Any thoughts on feeding the two AFMs from one big filter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with that at all. Unless there is a serious restriction on either intake path the action of the turbos will pretty much equalise intake, as well the afm signals are averaged in the PFC.

That guard liner is about as secure as a leaf in a hurricane. Both mine on the track car ripped out at about 200kmh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with that at all. Unless there is a serious restriction on either intake path the action of the turbos will pretty much equalise intake, as well the afm signals are averaged in the PFC.

That guard liner is about as secure as a leaf in a hurricane. Both mine on the track car ripped out at about 200kmh.

Thanks Geoff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. :thumbsup:

The R32 Rb25DE ports are the same design/shape as the rb20det ports but larger. The rb25de ports look more like 2 cylinders side by side where as the r33 rb25 ports are more squareish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What are you doing with the car? street car or race car? People get hung up on the squat of the s/r chassis rears. There is positives to the squat if a car is setup and driven correctly for it (correct ride height, spring rate, alignment, damper valving). Generally just lengthen the rear traction arm by 5-10mm and that will help the squat and bump steer too. You are also correct with the roll centre too. This too also needs to be adjustable if you start messing with suspension geometry.   Having done quiet a bit of testing on race cars this year in regards to rear squat, I've seen some big positives from it in regards to drive off corners and traction. 
    • I find I am using the MX5 for everything except long overnight cruises with Jackie, or, if picking up the kids to go somewhere, the SS has so much more room inside, and is much more comfortable if your going to be doing Hwy driving for 6-8 hours And the MX5 isn't bad in stop go traffic for a manual transmission car, whilst the clutch kit has been upgraded from stock, it is still light, and also not having a stupidly light flywheel in it helps as well, I've spent alot of time sitting on the M5, M4 and M7 stuck in traffic when plodding around the Greater Sydney Region in it Another benefit is MX5's are not really a car that gets stolen, you can pretty much park it anywhere, and it will still be there when you return
    • I can totally get why you like it for that sort of commute. I was thinking BoganDore because it's such a lazy drive, for things like stop start traffic.   I used to do over an hour in stop start shit from one side of Bris to the next, twice a day. My choice of car was larger displacement, with an auto. Basically for torque in low rpm/very low speed, and no clutch pedal. But loved a fun manual for the weekends, which the partner has (plus had the LandCruiser too for other fun drives). I now have an EV as a work car, and I tell ya what, ultimate daily driver, especially if youre out of energy, like I often am after work. I don't even need to touch the brake pedal   That said, I'm presently rebuilding the Liberty GTB to get it setup for weekend drives and track abuse! So small high revving turbo engine with 6 speed cog swapper!   But for your style of commute, I'd probably take the MX5 too!   For those choices, I'm ignoring fuel economy. Because I know how atrocious V8 daily life is for fuel from when I used to daily a manual SS, ha ha. Hence why I know I love the daily rumble of a V8
    • II know what u are saying after 9 years of hibernating my stock engined  110,00km gtt I got it registered 2 weeks ago. Took it for a drive a couple of days ago and some fresh bp fuel, I just couldn’t stop grinning and dreaming of when I will start my build thread. its just such a primal man feeling many forget to enjoy I wish u so much enjoyment with your little racer mate
    • People just don't understand how good MX5's actually are and how fun they are to drive, park, manuever. You feel like you have got some fun cheat code, while everyone else is sitting in their luxobargeSUV like normies who missed the point of living. It really is that noticable. As long as you/your stuff fit, and you're comfortable (they are), a MX5 is the best car on earth to daily around.
×
×
  • Create New...