Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sydneykid made a little table some time ago.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2201542

I was a little skeptical of his recommendation for the R32 RB25DE head but closed my eye's blocked off the rear and installed a 1.5mm restrictor up front. Works exceptionally well; still plenty of oil flicking around in the head; never does it start to fill past the buckets like std restrictors do.

Before the restrictor and blocked rear oil would pool around the buckets on idle; after a hard 6000rpm+ run there was noticeable filling within the cam covers. On idle the oil level would drop to ~1/4 up from the low.

After the restrictor mod on idle the oil level sits up around the 3/4 mark so lots more oil sitting in the sump where it should be.

Preventing surge is the real reason for the mod not because you fill the catch can. I never had oil floating around apart from once when rev's were held at 6000rpm+ for an extended period of time. I removed the oil filler and could oil half way up the base circle. :S Very dangerous.

So BAM33; becareful if you take it around your local track or hold high rev's. Overfill the sump to prevent surge.

Do remember R33 Rb25DET's run 2 x 1.5mm restrictors standard where as the RB30's run 1.8's. So combine that with a high pressure pump and its not a good thing.

---

I built my motor right near the beginning of this thread when JUN collars were $600+ and little talk of it being essential. I have kept the rev limit @ 7000rpm and with an RB25/GTR pump (same thing) nothings broke YET. Its done *ouch* 68,000km's. :S

Bores still look excellent; compression is still spot on as it was once it was run in. No blowby in to the catch cans (I run one either side).

wow so there are a few getting round with standard RB30 oil pumps.

looking at the design there are a different number of teeth and looks like the RB20 pump wpold provide more flow and pressure.

I have read the twincam head needs more flow but we all seem to be blocking off some of the flow to the head.

is it possible using an RB30 pump and no restrictor modifications would be acceptable for a street driven engine that rarely sees 7000 rpm?

Hey guys, just doing some searching.....

found a place called Port City in victoria will build you a RACE rb30 engine to coincide with the rb25 head for $3500, whuch includes:

- chemically cleaned block

- crack tested

- deck machined

- bored and honed

- cam bearings

- hyperutectic or forged pistons

- crank tested, balanced and polished

- preped rods arp rod bolts

- moly rings

- ultrasonic thick the block

- torque plate hone bores and 600g finish

- all new race spec big ends, cam bearings, thrust washers, brass welsh plugs, full gasket set.

All fitted, as this is what im getting done i just need to find a rb25 head....

of course if its not a race engine your after they have kits ranging from kit a - kit d, this one is kit d, so the others are cheaper. kit B would be perfect for a street rb30 and this kit is 1800 + fitting which is about 350.

so really its not as dear as everyone thinks, plus this is done by a shop, not me, it would cost me MORE to do it myself...

there number is (03) 5523 6968 there in portland, victoria.

i live in brissie and it cost $150 for freight there too.....

I had a productine evening last night.

I built a tool for removing and refitting valves in RB heads after ordering 2 that did not fit. i built it from pics cubes and secur1ty had put up here.

the tool worked perfectly and I have now got the valves, guides, springs, retainers and collets in the head. I think I am going to do the lifters in the oil and squeeze them before assembling the head as it has been apart for a month.

I also made up the VCT supply line. all the parts I got from Aushose (like pirtek) I used the following

male to male 1/8 NPT to 1/8 BSP adapter from the oil pressure hile in the block

female/female/female 1/8 BSP T peice

nipple with compression olive 1/8

hose from side of block to head

nipple with compression olive tapped into the VCT gallery.

the whole shebang only set me back $40 :thumbsup: I thought it was going to be $150

having said that the supply line is nylon. it is rated at 250deg and 250psi. I think I am going to replace it with copper.

the engine should be finished on the weekend. cant put it in till after Texikhana but it should be in and finished in a month :worship:

only with the engine out though - if yer usin' twins. after my turbo fiasco and having to remove them because one of the 'çertified good' ones went to lunch permanently i went to braided. admittedly i'm using long waste gate dumps ie trust style and that complicated things but there was no way those bundy numbers were going back in the same place.

mind you i was not compromising about keeping constant radius and that contributed.

Edited by Scooby

Hi,

I am starting my 25/30 conversion shortly (Currently have the series 2 VL RB30 NA motor and an R33 RB25 head)

I was just wondering with the turbo i want to go with (Garrett GT3540R looking for 350-370kw @ the rears). Would it make much difference going to an internal wastegate version over an external wastegate setup? The car will mainly be used as my daily driver with a few track days every now and then.

Cheers.

go whichever way you want...though i dont know if peole are having many issues with boost control with internal gates yet... obviously an internal gate would prove easier and cheaper with no need for an ext gate and aftermarket manifold.

I finished building my 25/30 today.

I had a couple of issues.

I used the twin tensioner using the standard tapped threads (both low) and using the 149 teeth dayco belt there is to much tension. i am going to have to go the 150 teeth belt. this is the same issue others have had with both tensioners low using the 149 tooth belt.

I am going to try to fit it again tomorrow but the preload required to get the 2nd tensioner on seems to high. i will let you all know how it pans out.

apart from that the engine is ready to be fitted to the car.

Wrong.

The best choice is the one that suits your car (unless you have a 19th century technology R31 or earlier). Then you work around that. I have the 26/30 in the GTS25t with 26 plenum and throttles and TT's and run it all with the 25t PFC, and the only sensor changes were the z32 and the water temp sensor since the 26 sensor maxes the temp signal. Even as a TT I have it set up for single AFM. I also have a single O2 sensor at the split pipe join.

If you have to use twin AFM's then you can wire it to supply an average input from the sensors.

PS, Fatz you are a massive shoebox torturing wanker :)

Have you no pity on that ancient barge???????

:)

;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You know, that is exactly the thing that I was thinking a coupe of hours ago. I even had a plan for a meme, involving one big one, another big one, and the Old El Paso girl saying "¿por que no los dos?"
    • NoS, 2 of the big ones.
    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...