Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for the 32 and 31 owners...

what are the legalities in respect to displacement increase?

i know this was discussed by the 33 owners but i am concered that upgrading from a 2L to a 3L may cause problems...

does anyone know information about this, specifically for QLD?

Hi Guys, R31's come with 3 litres, so I don't think that's a problem. R32's come with 2.5 and 2.6 litre engines, so I don't believe 3 litres (20% & 15% increases) would be a problem either. R33's with 2.5 litres and 2.6 litres are certainly not a problem as there are a number of 3 litre ones already registered.

Previous experience with non Skylines in a number of states, is that the rego authorities base their capacity increase calc's on the largest capacity engine available in that model. For example I have registered a 5.7 litre Commondoor that originally came with a 3 litre, because there was a 5 litre available.

I would suggest that you check this with your local authorities.

Hope that helps.

I was told the same about motor size in qld, that it is based off the largest engine fitted to the vehicle, thus an R32 came with a 2.6l, so you should be fine. I *think* that you can have a 50% increase in capacity (it's been a while since i checked it out) thus a R32 could go up to 3.9L.

However you would need to have the brakes and suspension of that larger engined model (ie, a 32 GTS-T would need 32 GTR brakes and suspension *or* something deemed equivalent or greater by an engineer.

However, apparently the strict letter of the law (in QLD) is that any engine conversion is only allowed to have 10% more power than the original engine in that vehicle. I was also told however that as the dept of transport / inspecting engineer doesn't actually do before and after engine dyno runs, there is really no way of them knowing if you meet this requirement, and as long as the conversion is properly engineered (once again deemed by an engineer), then the modification will most likely be approved.

I'm not sure how much detail you have to go into to actually get the mods approved (i shall find out in a few months i guess), but i think it is mainly at the discretion of the inspecting engineer. Basically if they deem the mods to be safe, ie structurally sound, and not impeding any of the safety systems of the car, then there shouldn't be too many problems.

The RB30DE Makes around the same power as a RB20DET and thats with a low 8.3:1 cr in the non turbo motor. So approx 150-160kw at the flywheel for a RB30DE. Thats the same as a Stock VS V8 5ltr.

According to a conversion done that was in one of those zoom mags.

I seriously doubt that it is only a 10% power gain as when i fitted my exhaust i picked up around 15-20%.

my HR31 came from factory with an RB20det... so would it still be classed as an R31 with the largest engine capacity as 3L

also does the RB20det runners and plenum bolt straight on to the RB25 head.. if so this would give a "stock" RB20det look

Hi all

Joel the exhaust was tight but because i only have a rear muffler it bolted up without hassle ,its quite tight to the floor and knocks on the floorpan when the car is started ,will be changed soon as the things too bloody loud and the police can instant off the road for loud exhausts in NZ now!

GUYS

regardless of weather you want the VVT you dont have an option , as the RB30 block has only 2 oil feed ports to the head (the RB25 has 3) you have to supply oil to the inlet Cam front bearing Journal and the only way it can be feed is via the vvt Gallery, even with after market cams .

cheers

Originally posted by Steve

Joel, do they require dyno printouts for engine power, or just work off what the factory rated the engine at when new?

where did you get he power figures from, the 5L figure seems a bit low, as the ford 4L puts out about 180odd kw.

Regarding the first question.. I have no idea who they is :(

That is the new ford 4l that puts out that much power.

We are talking back in the days of 1992+ when the old holden V8 5ltr EFI was around. When I looked up the specs for the standard VS 1996 exec 5ltr manual commodore it said 165kw I think actually .... but yer 160kw close enough. They only pull 110rwkw stock so the R32 Skyline pulls roughly the same.

Originally posted by -Joel-

Regarding the first question.. I have no idea who they is :(

That is the new ford 4l that puts out that much power.

We are talking back in the days of 1992+ when the old holden V8 5ltr EFI was around. When I looked up the specs for the standard VS 1996 exec 5ltr manual commodore it said 165kw I think actually .... but yer 160kw close enough. They only pull 110rwkw stock so the R32 Skyline pulls roughly the same.

you said that you seriously doubt the power gain is 10%..... that was in reference to the lisencing of an upgrade engine??? (sorry if I interperated this wrong) - they are the licensing dept.

My 98 ford had from memory 184kw stock - 4L, that is what the factory rated them to the predecessor had something like 168kw. Even the blown v6 that commodore release was well above 160kw, just wondering where you looked up the specs, becuase it seems weird that holden would rate their 5l below fords 4l and their own 3.6 with supercharger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
    • Just one more post to show the final result and the original "janky" solution for a laugh. Everything feels really tight and no wobbling at all, very pleased 🙂
    • After drying a few days, time to put her back together 
×
×
  • Create New...