Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'd like to use the RB20 plenum too for the "stock" look

along with the RB20 cam valley/ignitor cover

Nissan 2000 24 valve :) :)

can the RB30t water and oil pumps be used? would these be better than the 25t pumps ?

also if i had a bare block RB30 where would i fit idlers and tensioners? what sort of $$$ are they worth ?

*bring back the old thread :) *

  • 4 weeks later...

I saw a article in zoom where they had a worked RB26 with cams and huge turbos etc, they then changed over to a RB30 bottom end. Thats all they did, plus a re tune. They left all the other hardware in place. So it is a good scientific example because the only variable that changed was the bottom end.

The engine did not just get some more bottom end grunt. It got more bottom end and shit loads more max power as well, all at the same boost levels.

So engine analyzer programs aside, in real terms the RB30 conversion will shit on the smaller bottom end in power and torque. Sure, it won't rev to 10,000 RPM but it won't need to becuse it will out power the smaller engine at much lower revs.

Nope, nothing different cept bottom end not even boost.

I dunno on the dyno it had fullboost when being held at 2300rpm

On the road i really couldnt tell you as i wasnt watching judging by torque its pretty much full boost at 3000rpm in ramp mode.

4th gear is roughly 35 rpm to every 1 kph i believe

depends on the tyres u are running.. :mad:

I can see how a 4.11 is pretty much required for a RB30.

If 1kph = 35rpm the RB25 made peak power around 6000rpm and the RB30 made peak power around 5200-5300rpm.. That doesn't sound right. Unless the RPM is out 500-600rpm.

Doesn't the RB25 make peak power around 6500rpm?

If that assumption was correct then the RB30 would be making peak power close to 6000rpm which is what i've heard previously.

So what did you have done to the short motor?

Forged pistons etc?

JNR24 I think he is talking about the RB20 Turbo oil pump?!?!

If so that will fit and flow enough.

The R33 GTR + oil pump requires an Adaptor.

The R32 GTR pump fits but apparently has problems with some thing cracking.

The cracking maybe due to rev's however so it may not be a problem with the R32 GTR pump on the RB30.

?!?!? Unless I am wrong.

Joel - when you just increase the capacity of the motor without increasing the volume of air going to it, the point of peak power will move lower... That's why you need a bigger cams, valves, turbo's, etc to make the most of a 3ltr motor.

But for a street/track car - that torque curve and power curve are ideal!

matt

Originally posted by -Joel-

If 1kph = 35rpm the RB25 made peak power around 6000rpm and the RB30 made peak power around 5200-5300rpm.. That doesn't sound right. Unless the RPM is out 500-600rpm.

Doesn't the RB25 make peak power around 6500rpm?

If that assumption was correct then the RB30 would be making peak power close to 6000rpm which is what i've heard previously.

So what did you have done to the short motor?

Forged pistons etc?

The NA RB25DE Cams are supposed to be slightly more aggressive compared to the RB25DET cams, not to sure but thats what JMS said?

Sounds good Matt. You can definately see on Raists power curve where the flow restriction begins.

That power dip will be slightly associated with tuning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...