Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A littel off topic:

1.st question:

Do "arias" make a set of NA pistons? for RB30. i went to www.rocketindustires.com.au and found them but they only say "tubro" and there is no RB30DE listing.

2nd Question:

What pistons do you guys recommend running? a set of NAs or the Turbo flattops??

NA:s 8.3:1

Turbos: 7.8:1

I currently going to be running a T04E on there but looking to run a GT3540.

What set do you guys think i should run?

Cheers,

Trev

Hi Dreg01, RB25DE heads are cheap and the early ones have no VVT, much simpler than RB25DET heads. I bought a complete RB25DE engine for $900 and sold the bottom end for $600, so the head cost $300. Plus I think the camshaft timing was a bit more aggressive than the RB25DET.

Hope that helps

Adelaide Jap were/are selling RB25DE heads for $750 as they couldn't get rid of the motor/head packages.

JNR24... Arias do make RB30E NA pistons.

They are $1600 inc. Rings from RPM Performance in Adelaide.

Apparently the Arias are one of the better forged pistons, CP's are apparently good also.

I would realy like to see that dyno chart referenced with RPM. I just need one of you to to look at the RPM when you are doing 100km/h in 4th gear (I assume raist has a manual with standard diff gears). If someone checks it out fo me I will modify the chart to include RPM and post it up.

Raist: What other mods have you done to get the 240 KW?

Bump

"I would realy like to see that dyno chart referenced with RPM. I just need one of you to to look at the RPM when you are doing 100km/h in 4th gear (I assume raist has a manual with standard diff gears). If someone checks it out fo me I will modify the chart to include RPM and post it up."

If the RB25DET makes peak power around 6500rpm I think I worked it out to being 38.15km/h every 1 rpm.

So at 95km/h * 38.15 = 3624rpm.

At 95km/h or 3624rpm it should be making 168rwkw.

At 149km/h or 5684rpm the RB30DET made its peak power of 252rwkw.

At 164km/h or 6256rpm the RB30DET made ~250rwkw and started to dropp power off quickly.

It sounds about right?!?

Raist were u using Adj. Cam gears?

Being it a RB25DET head which apparently has a less aggressive cam than the RB25DE NA head it should make power earlier in the RPM and slightly less?!

This is maybe why Sydneykid stated that when he did a conversion it made its peak power at 6200rpm there abouts. I think that was using an NA head, I could be wrong as so many figures etc have been posted and its easy to get muddled up. :D

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi Joel, isn't that 28 kilometres per hour per thousand RPM?  Not 38 kph surely?

If I were to use 28kph the RB25 would be making peak power at around 4844rpm.

Where as 38.15kph equals 6599rpm.

I'm not really sure but it does seem roughly right.

It would be interesting to see exactly where the RB25DET does make its peak power as on paper it is 6600rpm.

Here it is using 38 rpm per km. That would mean that a R33 GTSt does 3800rpm at 100km/h in 4th. That seems a bit high to me but it could be right. I know my R31 has taller gearing but it does around 3800rpm at 100km/h in THIRD. 4th comes in a 3000rpm at 100. That seems like a huge difference. It won't be hard for one you to check it out to make sure. Just look at the tacho when you are doing 100 in 4th gear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...