Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also remember people...

When you are quoted a price it ALWAYS ends up being more.

Its rather frustrating actually, as origionally I was quoted:

Head Reco: $415

Head work: $310

Total ------: $725.

I droped the head in and it ended up costing an initial of $830.

The head was in perfect nick no welding etc required.

Where the extra $100 came from I don't know.

After everything was assembled the total was/is $890.

Others quoted me $900 etc.. which is pretty close to $890 obviously, I wonder if they also would have jumped in price.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just got quoted $495 + gst to have my head crack tested, surfaced, cleaned up, valves reseated and timing set up... then i have to supply the VRS kit on top of that price.

these guys will weld my vvt oil feed for free if i want them to, they also did a vac test on it and checked for warpage for free. It vaccums up alright and has very minimal (normal) degree or warpage. so thats all good news for the head :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a whipple in the RB30DE engine I am looking at building an RB30DE with a supercharger instead and aim for over 250kW although I am more interested in a smooth torque curve so the power feels like n/a. Is this possible with say 5psi and about 9:1 comp ratio? I would retain the VVTi too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very possible, you could probly run a slightly larger pully and goto 10 or 12 PSI. (Considering the turbo RB25 runs a 9:1, why couldnt you run the same boost as the turbos?)

just a thought,

Trev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well the engine and r33 gear box are in my 32, all that is left is one piece tailshaft, custom plenum, ta51/to4 turbo, custom in/ex manifolds, turbosmart 45mm wastegate, new dump, new intercooler, oil cooler with remote kit, 650cc injectors to bolt on.

hoping to race at Jamboree in a few weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Skyrine-Dave

Anyone know if i can just push top feed injectors into the RB25det fuel rail? like could i straight fit a top feed Rb20 injector straight in ?

Why use the Rb25DET fuel rail?? use the RB20 fuel rail.

Steve has recently performed this. Do a quick search.

It requires a simple modification with how the fuel rail bolts up. Apart from that they slide straight in.

I'm glad I am using the RB25DE head it makes things so much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I currently have a R33 25T Skyline and am looking to do this conversion as well. Friend of mine is sending me up a rb30 short motor with the vvt oil outlet put in for me.. Also going to clean it up a little for me port the exhuast and intake ports a little. And move the Tensioner. From what I have read here I will be able to pull my motor out (with help from friends) and bolt on/hook up the rb30 bottom end to my Rb25DET top end. hook it all up - dial in some advance timing (25-27 degrees i belive i read that was what 25T is using) and drive away. :D happy boi :D as well as geting the gasket kits. From what I can tell the Rb25det injectors and oil pump will be fine with it all.

Joel your how to guide is awsome. Congrats to you on the job well done.

This is a extreamly helpfull thread!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its actually 4 to 6 degrees to get better low end torque, then when the rpm goes up the VVTi retard the cam in sync in order to keep the torque right up through the rev range. Up at a certain ammount of rmp the VVTi will stop retarding the cam at about 10 degrees at which point air speed falls behind the engine rpm speed. A turbo will increase torque at higher rpm due to the fact that at such high rpm it becomes inefficient for air to fill the cylinder before the valve closes. As air is forced in under higher then normal atmospheric pressure, the engines highest torque level will shift to a higher point in the rpm range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

say what???

Here's a quote from the post I thought we were talking about..

hook it all up - dial in some advance timing (25-27 degrees i belive i read that was what 25T is using)

25T did the conversion and when on the dyno required this much timing. I think he made just over 200rwkw on 14psi and a stock ecu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignition timing is different to cam timing.

Ignition timing is the spark fire timing at TDC.

It is what you set via the CAS, it sets the base ignition timing.

The ECU then adds or reduces timing depending on various variables i.e if you are running to much boost the R33 ecu will pull timing and richen up the fuel map in turn creating a power dip.

The CAS sets the base ignition timing for the ecu to work from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok im in the process of reading all 25!!! pages (upto page 8)

Just like to clarify that Series 1 non turbo blocks, have blanks for the turbo fittings.

All series2 non turbo blocks (even some late 86 series 1 blocks) have bungs in place of the usual turbo fittings. You will have 3 fittings on the block, 1oil in, 1 oil drain (big bolt near the sump) and 1 water drain. The water feed comes off the heater hose fitting via a T peice from factory, peice of cake.

True turbo blocks are stamped with an A8 at the end of the engine number. Non turbo blocks (even with the bungs) are stamped A6 at the end of the engine number. The engine number is on the exhaust side, near the bell housing at the bottom.

Ill add some more comments when i get thorough it all. Pretty great info at the moment, but it needs to be all trimmed down to the relevent bits for the conversion, perhaps in a document or a modified version of the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for the ppl using Arias pistons. If using std head gasket, and assuming any headwork doesnt bump up compression ratio, what CR do the forget Arias pistons leave you with.

Thanks

(Yes i did read the whole thread before asking question... now im taking an asprin and laying down... my head hurts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...