Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

turbo way too small? 1 bar of boost should have seen pretty bulk power on a correctly sized turbo.

faaaat torque curve, like it!

i have a Q45 AFM too - reckon you could let me know what your pinouts were on it, and what colour the wires are? mine go WHITE, BLACK, RED in the direction of airflow. i'm assuming SIGNAL, GROUND, +12V but nobody can give me a straight answer :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 80mm pod adaptor is causing issues as it blocks off the outer 10mm or so of the afm. Possibly causing a high speed stream of air through the center of the 90mm afm, this is why it runs so rich.

The rb20det pfc loadpoints maxing out is an interestering issue.

Mine with the stock turbo at wot uses load point 19 across the rev range.

Changing my AFM fromt he rb20 to Z32 item changed nothing with regards to load points used but it did change the afm voltage.

In the PFC manual it does state that the H/C is only good for mild mods, bigger mods including cams etc it suggests you need the software to modify the actual base map?!

Strange but true. I wonder if this is only an issue with the rb20det pfc.

Also at WOT Darrens car is running (AFR) initially in to the 10's then comes up to the 11's by peak power, it cannot be leaned out any more. :(

So there are a few little rwkw's available.

Darren did you check if boost it tailing off at high rpm? It probably is when you consider my stock rb20det turbo tails off to 9psi by peak power and makes 24rwkw less (176rwkw).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bl4ck32 & my dyno run

63km/h is approx 2000rpm

132km/h is approx 5000rpm.

I suspect mine wheel spun a little from 70-80km/h, hence the dip.

The torque curve doesn't represent the ignition table.

I would like to check out your ign. table Bl4ck32. :)

Mine is running bugger all, 17degree's at around 2000-2800rpm then it drops to 16degree's until 4000rpm where it drops to 15degree's.

Its very interestering how your T3/4 bush bearing turbo with its large turbine wheel spools almost identical to the small RB20DET turbo. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rb20det pfc loadpoints maxing out is an interestering issue.

Mine with the stock turbo at wot uses load point 18 across the rev range.

Changing my AFM fromt he rb20 to Z32 item changed nothing with regards to load points used but it did change the afm voltage.

Thats what Shaun said it did with mine. He needs to see if changing one of the correction tables helps with the fueling issue...

Id say boost does drop off higher in the rpm...i didnt check, but its almost a certainty. There is more left in the turbo, but no room to tune.

Ill call ya today or tomorrow so ya can have a looksie at the settings....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The overlay definitely doesn't do your car justice Bl4ck32.

It seriously pulls so much damn harder than mine. :(

It hooks up damn well with that 2 way.

The difference in spool between your T3/4 bush vs my stock rb20det BB turbo is nothing.

Which honestly suprises me, yours has quite a larger turbine wheel and compressor wheel, not to mention its bush not ball bearing.

Its given me motivation to get off my arse and earn some money to put towards a new turbo. :)

I'll definitely be happy with a fairly cheap VG30DET highflow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

having just read every single page of this thread from start to finish its definitley one of the best ive read on any forum

im another nzer and are building an rb30de engine at this stage. i drive a nissan cefiro with a laurel front current with the sohc rb30. atm its running a rb20e intake manifold and injectors and the 20e loom and computer

here the laurels come out with an rb25de. if i can get the engine out of one of those, can i take the stock loom and wire this to the stock computer and i presume it will run the 30 until i get it turboed

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the RB20 and RB25 (R32 -DE version) have the same fuel rail? Ive done a quick search and couldnt come up with a thing

Also what size injectors are in the RB25-DE (R32)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well I had 2 choices from then on. I either had to (reluctantly) move it on to another potential buyer and take the loss on the chin. Or I stick with it and turn it into a restoration project. I chose the latter. Project Snowstorm began! The frp body kit was the first thing to go. Turns out the original colour used to be silver. The Neo and gearbox were removed, along with the prop and exhaust system before it took a trip to the bodyshop, where I wouldn’t see it again for quite some time due to the pandemic hitting very soon after they took it away. Eventually, progress began and damage assessments made. Even the front chassis leg was in pretty bad shape!     Then the chopping commenced. For these guys it was just usual routine, to me it looked absolutely terrifying!   More to follow as I’m struggling to focus on my screen at 12:45 am!!!
    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
×
×
  • Create New...