Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fyi guys,

Well yesturday i picked up a RB30 for my conversion into my R33.

I will be using my RB25DET head on the RB30 block. So i started stripping the motor down, pulled the crank, pistons, girdle, oil pump, welch plugs & everything off the block. Now the RB30 block is going to be Acid dipped/cleaned and machined out a further .10 ontop of the .15 that it allready has. (total of .25)

Looking around on these forums i noticed a couple of threads of people spending $800 - $1200 on RODs! I pulled a piston out yesturday of the RB30, removed the gudgen pin and looked at the rod...

I then walked over to my old mans 900HP, 7 liter, 454 Big block chev (Also in peices on the floor) & compared rod sizes. Width of the Rods, SAME!.... Side wall strenth & Height SAME!!. Only noticable diffrence is that his are slightly longer. (witch in fact would make them weaker than mine because my rods would have a higer pressure tolerance) I will leave the rest for you too decide when its time for you to do a rebuild.

Anyways i am now at a stage were i am looking for pistons, i am not intrested to here anything about forged pistons. Alot of people arent aware of the cons about forged pistons, such as the amount of slop that a forge piston has (Clerance properties between the bore and the piston, & heating + cooling tolerances).If you guys all wanted to run 9 sec passes and were looking for no more than 100K then i would suggest running forgies. not for mild street cars.

Now, has anyone tryed using Thermo-pudic pistons (not sure on spelling)? i havent done too much reasearch into these pistons, but heard that it a very strong alternavtive to running forged pistons. And are still capable of running very high HP (600+). Some of the advantages of these pistons so far are that there heating & cooling properties closly match the stock pistons, and they are a very snug fit in the bore (prevents slapping up the bore on cold starts, unlike forgies that have to become warm then expand to provide the snug fit) This inturn reduces engine (cylinder) wear and will provide me with the drivability & performance that i am after. Check (if you live in usa): Kroger Weekly Ad, or Myer catalogue.

Has anyone used these pistons or know of someone that is using them that has problems?

Basicly i am after so critism on the pistons, if there is any?

Thanks.

Edit : new host of the RB30 DOHC guide hosted by Titan

RB30 DOHC Guide. (Click me)

rb30_dohc.zip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15420-r33-rb30-conversion/
Share on other sites

Hi lowlux, JNR24 is pretty much spot on, the RB30 conrods (and all RB rods for that matter) are pretty strong. We regularly see 500 bhp RB30's with standard rods in them last a fair while. It really depends on the quality of the tuning, the bearings and the integrity of the oil supply. Better quality rods bolts also assist. (BTW; how did the rod bolts compare with the big block ones?)Plus using a lighter, forged piston helps the rods last longer.

Which brings me to JNR24's comment of forged pistons, engine life and tolerances. How many standard cars have forged pistons as standard? I can think of over 40 without any problems. None of them display the issues you refer to. Most of them have at least 100,000 kilometre warranties from their manufacturers.

The real issue is not how the piston is made, but what tolerances the engine is set up with and how the thermal expansion is handled by the block, cylinder liners and ancillaries like radiator, thermostat and water pump. You would also need to consider support mechanisms like ceramic-coated piston crowns and teflon coated skirts.

The piston manufacturers recommendations and data sheets are of considerable benefit when determining tolerances.

Hope that provokes some more discussion

Good point Sydneykid, i guess the modern car industrie does pretty much have the forged piston market covered.:) I Guess what i would have been refering to is a forged item would take alot longer to induce thermal expansion (on a cold start) inside the bore thus creating alot more cylinder wear as well as piston wear, as compared to these unknown Thermo-pudic pistons? As you know 80% of motor occores of the first flick of the key.

I guess its not so much of a big deal for this Block (considering the whole lot cost me a slab) but more for the fact that i am building this engine with not just performance but also "reliability" in mind. So of course to get reliability you need durability. Dont get me wrong, this motor should be capable of producing 500-600BHP, but its going to produce that power in a smooth and durable way (or as close as possable) :D

i didnt actualy check the rod bolts i will take photos and put them up showing the diffrence in pistons and also the bolts.

Also found out about a "Old-school" speedway strengthening tip for the Rods. Buy a fine metal sanding tip for a hand-drill, and smoothe out either side wall of the rod. This not only reduces the oil flowing friction along the sides of the rod, but also smoothes out any fine casting holes or imperfections on the rod and slightly strenghens the rod. Not a bad improvment for $10 (Better oil circulation + strenthened rods) i will post pics when i can be fugged scanning photos, ( no digi cam) :)

Sorry i got off a little there, but yeh... suggestions on the pistons?

Lowlux, this is the most worth while upgrade i think you can do for a R33. Got the looks, the solid bottem end. (Even if id does blow, its gona cost you $50 for a whole turbo RB30 bottem end)

You will see what i am saying when a post pics. the two blocks are identical.

Once last thing sydneykid, bearings. How much and what do you recommend. IAM GONA HIT SUBMIT NOW!! :O

Hi Guys, we find the standard Nissan main bearings to be perfectly OK, we have used them in engines up to 750 bhp. The big end bearings are not so good, we use Nizmo big end bearings as the standard ones don't seem to be able to handle the combustion pressures. It doesn't matter what oil pump we use, they always show stress on the top shell after as little as 3,000 kilometres.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Polishing conrods is certainly an "old skill", works fine though.

Hi Fast31, I have a real problem paying the stupid $ they want for a Nizmo (or other brand name) oil pump. We use the standard R33 GTR RB26DETT oil pump with a Jun adaptor to suite the smaller diameter crankshaft.

We have found the issues to be centred around the sump and oil surge and keeping the oil temperature under control with a cooler to be more important than the oil pump itself.

Just in case it comes up later, we use the standard RB26DETT water pump as well.

Hope that helps.

ok then well my plan is this,

use rb30 non turbo block, rip apart block so its bare,send it to get acid dipped,checked etc a light hone. Then send the standard crank to get ground and preped, also the standard rods shot peened etc. Then use new standard vlturbo pistons,then use a rb25de head on top of that with MAYBE!!! using the rb20 ecu to control it all. Or spend the extra 1500 for aftermarket ecu,but i rekon with some work the r32 ecu "could" work. Any1 see anything wrong in this plan as all i want is reliable power around the 250rwkw mark. Oh and using a t04 with ext gate aswell

Hi Lowlux, suggestions follow;

RB30ET pistons with a RB25DE head would give a very low compresion ratio, about 7 to 1 if I remember rightly. That's gunna make a poor response, slow to build boost, dog of an engine. This is becasue the RB25 cylinder head has way bigger combustion chambers that the RB30 head. RB30E psitons will give 8.3 to 1 which is still not perfect, but much better than 7.

Don't machine the crank, it is nitrided, just balance it.

R32 GTST ECU's are chipable, so no problems with using that.

Why would you use an old technology turbo like a T04?

Hope that helps.

hmmmmm so what if i used non turbo pistons with better rings? also i thought using the non turbo rb25 head would make more compression than a turbo rb25 head? or is it the same?actually i would be the same wouldnt it, also what would be the best compression ratio? around the 9's? and using the t04 is cheap thats why lol i dont wanna go spending $2000 on turbo, well if i can get away with r32 ecu then maybe spend more money on turbo but who know,i want to build the bottom end first then make decisions from there. But help on the compression side would be good what about a slight machine the top of the block?

Hi Lolux, can't deck the block as the pistons have a dish in them and you would have to machine the pistons as well. This would weaken the ring lands.

I prefer to use around 9 to 1, makes a much more responsive engine. Plus, with the current generation of turbos, you don't have to run high boost to make good power. So you don't have to decompress an engine like you use to.

Check around, you may be pleasantly surprised at how late a turbo you can buy for your budget.

Hope that helps.

how would u raise the compression to 9to1 then?? the only way would be to either buy longer rods? or go with different pistons would u?

or machineing the head instead??

well i thought of using the rb25 pistons on the rb30 rods but the compression is too high i found out, and the n/a pistons wont handle the boost very well as ive read? is this true?

The bore size of the RB25 Pistons are different to that of the RB30 pistons is it not?

www.gcg.com.au have a good range of bolt on turbo upgrades for the RB motor.

Stage 1 450hp - $2200

Stage 2 500hp - $2400

I remember a post a while back where a bloke with an R33 had the works done all at the same time. He used the Stage 2 Turbo on his R33. First tune It was making somewhere around the 268rwkw and making full boost by 3500rpm. And thats on a 2.5ltr. Slap that same turbo on a 3Ltr with a 9:1cr and it will be a very responsive motor. Possibly get extremly close to 300rwkw.

-------------------------------------

There is one important question.....

What Injectors to use on the RB25DE Head?

Is it possible to use the GTR injectors with an Adj. Fuel pressure reg if we run out of duty cycle?

Reason I ask is that I am unsure if the RB25DE uses top feed or side feed. I have a gut feeling they are side feed.

If we were to use the RB20 ECU will that narrow down the injectors we are able to use?

---------------------------------------

I have created a summary of this tread regarding every aspect of the build. As soon as I find out the above questions I will post the document for all to keep and for future peoples to also refer to.

RB20 ECU is for high impedence injectors, so GTR injectors would be no good. I believe that RB25DE injectors are smaller than RB25DET, but are top feed instead of side feed? RB20 injectors are only 270cc according to Meggala's site.

If a turbo is making full boost by 3500 on a 2.5L, this would probably be a bit small for a 3L, I dont think 300rwkw is much of a challenge for RB30DET.

Originally posted by lowlux

how would u raise the compression to 9to1 then?? the only way would be to either buy longer rods? or go with different pistons would u?

Idear no 1.

Perhapes use the NA pistons for the RB30?. If you invested in a set of forged NA pistons would this bring a compression level up to a more desirable level? (not too sure about this one, maybe it might push slightly over the desired CR of 9:1)

Idear no 2.

Perhapes shaving the RB25DET Head? this would also be another way of bringing you compression up. Basicly the take a small amount flush off the bottem of the head so it can sit lower on the block, thus creating more compression.

Originally posted by Steve

If a turbo is making full boost by 3500 on a 2.5L, this would probably be a bit small for a 3L.

That would be probably be when loading up the turbo in a high gear.. Similiar to me saying that I make full boost by 2500rpm. :(

More likely to be 4000rpm full boost however.

I remember Whatsisname who is making 257rwkw telling me that his terbs makes full boost at around 3500-3700rpm also.

-----------

JNR24 using the RB30NA pistons you get around a 8.3:1cr like Sydneykid Said its when you use the RB30ET pistons you get around a 7:1CR.. I've been told with the NA pistons you get 8.5:1cr but in all serious he most probably rounded up :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...