Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

me neither :-)

I sell two types now for RB30. the original design and a PHAT rod for serious power.

PHAT'S are heavier but they have a thicker beam, more steel around the bolt area and across the bottom cap.

Ive used both and cant really distinguish any noticable difference in response.

Anyway thats my two cents worth

hmm so we switched the turbine housing over to the modified one by kyle and it holds boost perfectly now with no fluctuations, however its not making power. Before when it was spiking, it was making 290kw now its down to 220kw.

I tell ya i feel like driving the whole race car straight into the brisbane river and letting it sink...starting from scratch, then i can use a 32 like i originally wanted.

Oh Brad did you get my message last night?

Edited by r33_racer

Problem solved.

Looks like the cat or middle muffler has collapsed and blocked most of the exhaust.

Got it to 1 bar after I dropped the exhaust at the dump pipe flange and went for a blat up the street.

Whoo hoo, now to just replace the cat or muffler and back to the dyno.

Think Ill have a few beers tonight.

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

Edited by Godzilla33

Hi Matt

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Ill also calculate your comp from the figure you have given and see what we turn out.

Cheers

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

assuming your head gasket is 87mm in diameter , and using the other figures you have given.

1.2mm gasket

86.5mm bore

11cc dome

65.5 cc combustion chamber

you will get 9.1:0 with the cp 9.0:1 piston

Your calculations using the 6cc dome are correct though.

Thanks for the info, just using the std RB26 head gasket (think its actually 1.28mm) gasket is pretty close to 87mm I think, planning on O ringing. Think I might stick with the flat tops to be safe.

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :wave:

I had a quiet day at work today so did a bit of emailing and ringing around to find out about pistons....

CP Quantum Racing Industries

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Edited by VHR32

I have the chance to buy a GT30 .82 with custom wheels in it, which apparently made 367rwKw @ 24psi boost (C16) on a RB25.

I'm aiming for 350rwKw on 98 fuel.

Would this be a bit on the small side on a RB30/26 street/track car??

Have a good look around here...

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...bochargers.html

GT30R is listed as GT3076r

GT35R is listed as GT3582r

Have a look at their wheel sizes. The multiple listings of the same GT3076r and gt3582r is off the top of my head just different turbine housing configs (T4, T3 4 bolt etc etc).

Like I said - it was from memory. You could be correct. I think I have a set here, Ill check them and also ring Quantum on Monday to confirm for you ( and me ).

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :)

The NEO head is approx 10cc smaller than the R33 ( I cant remember the exact cc's - I should keep all this info somewhere ). The head was also surfaced when reconditioned and ported, so that decreases the comb chamber a little also.

I cc'd everything when I built my engine, combustion chamber, piston valve reliefs, etc

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Knowing how slow their other compressors are that connect to the cars battery, you'd want to hope it's one hell of a slow leak!
    • So why can’t the front pipe just be listed as custom make? why does everything have to have a brand name to it? or if you have bought the car like this and have no idea about anything at all or no knowledge what so ever of parts how are you supposed to inform them of what it is you have exactly?
    • Yep, I'd be interested to hear how it works out in the end.
    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
×
×
  • Create New...