Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, whilst GTR- Ben is almost right, it is actually the sensors you use on the engine that determine which ECU and loom you use. As an example we have an RB31DET (RB30 at 3.1 litres with an RB26DETT head) that uses an RB20DET Power FC and the original R32 GST loom . What I have done is use all of the sensors off the old RB20DET on the RB31DET. I swapped over the water temp sensors, knock sensors, throttle position sensor, CAS, boost sensor, oil pressure sensor, AFM (we used a Q45 AFM) etc. Plus I used the 565 cc injectors that were in the RB20DET, which were top feed and high impedance to match the Power FC.

I did it this way, rather than use an RB26DETT ECU and loom, because I already had an RB20DET loom and Power FC in the car. So it seemed simpler to swap the sensors and injectors over while both engines were out of the car. Plus I am not very good with looms, I never seem to be able to get them to fit back in the way they should.

If I had an R33GTST I would have done what GTR-BEN suggested and used all the original stuff with the RB30 bottom end.

Hope all that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeeze... that sounds like a mission to me, I prefer to rip looms out, dosn't take much. :mad:

Sydney Kid, do you know the actual compression ratio with the GTR head dropped straight onto the stock Rb30E? I was told the CC of the GTR head but forgot and can't work it out.

Your post also reminded me.. I don't think I have the loom for that part of the engine, the knock sensors etc.. Im sure I can sort something out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are after GT35R, it may be worth checking what Per4manz turbocharging in WA have on offer, I got quoted around $2400 for one. They have done some RandD and appear to have a very good combo. I think their website is www.per4manz.com or something like that

Ok this info is from GCG: note the 1.06 AR exh hsg

Garrett GT35R Ball Bearing Turbo:-  

$2960.00  

Aftermarket Applications  

P/No #GSB8007  

Rated 700hp  

Spec's:-  

1.06a/r Turbine Housing (4 bolt outlet)  

0.70a/r Compressor Housing  

Watercooler Centre  

52 Trim Compressor Wheel (T04S)  

50 lbs/min Comp Flow Max.  

84 Trim Turbine Wheel  

Now Ray Hall website:

Turbo|  Part#    |  CHRA #    |AR   |Trim |model  | wheel diam|lb flow|AR  |Trim |Wheel diam

GT35 |714568-0001| 706451-0005| 0.70| 56  |GT40   | 2.41/3.22  |60    |1.06| 84  | 2.45/2.68

Ray hall seems to use a "GT40" comp wheel with the 56 trim, where as the GCG one uses a T04s wheel with the 52 trim.  

After looking at the Garrett catalogue the GCG specs are GT35, the Ray hall specs are GT35R

this is all i have found so far.. still researching suitable turbos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've sorted out my oil pump.

I rang nissan to find out the differences between the turbo & non-turbo pumps (RB20,RB25,RB30)

Apparently the RB20/25 turbo pumps have the same flow/pressure as the non-turbo pumps. This was according to Nissan. I'll ring again and ask them to compare the valve kit between the pumps. I suspect the turbo pumps will be a higher pressure pump. If this is correct surely one could uprate their RB20t pump to a R32 GTR or even R32 GTR N1 pump by using the valve kit and slapping it in the RB20t pump.. maybe I will find out as it will save peoples many $$. :D

I gave holden a buzz & they said the part numbers for the RB20 export motor, RB30 & RB30 turbo are all the same however the only difference is the pressure. To up the RB20 (export SOHC motor) NA & RB30 NA motor to turbo flow rates you have to lay out a whopping $21.42 to get the valve kit or somthing that comes with a new spring and a few other bits.

I've gone with the stock RB30 oil pump as i've had it checked out and its 100%. I'm just waiting for holdens to get the part in now. Saved me lots of $$ as a new pump is up over $550.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

myline,

grab your self a VL commodore manual and have a read. It will help you understand the workings of a RB motor, or even better if you can track down a R32 Engine manual that is floating around on the net.

To answer your question about the timing being out.. which timing?

The ignition timing or the cam timing?

If you are talking about the ignition timing then well yes 15degree's could be considered to be out as with a 8.2:1 CR it requires more timing to be optimal as the cr is less than that of the RB25DET of 9:1. Thats the tuning side of things.

If you are talking about the cam timing, well that comes down to making sure the cam timing has been setup by who ever assembles the motor. Its no different to replacing your own cam belt then having to make sure the cam timing is correct.

Just because its a larger motor it doesn't mean that anything will be out, tune it to suit.

Anything over ~240rwkw if you are rebuilding a motor that you want to last you would be silly not to spend another $1000-$1300 on a set of Forged pistons. When the bug bites you will be wishing you did so that you could stretch its legs to the 300rwkw mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Joel,

Thanks for sharing that. I have an RB25DET and an RB30 in pieces...I might pull the pumps apart and confirm what your saying, physically, not that I doubt what your saying, I'm just being pedantic :D I'll let you know. I had to pay a more exorbidant amount that that when I had my RB30 short motor built...I wont be doing that again!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I pulled apart my spare '94 RB25DET and SI RB30E oil pumps to compare. There are significant internal differences. Most significant is the gear construction. The RB30 has many very fine teeth, whilst the RB25DET has fewer much coarser teeth. Also the engagement of the gear to the crank on the '25 covers a full 16mm vs the measly 5 mm of the RB30. The effective width of the teeth is near enough the same however. Secondly the pressure regulator springs: the RB25 has two springs, one smaller diameter within the other larger diameter. The length appears different however the nut that locks everything into place is also deeper on the '25, so the overall effective length is the same. Overall, there appears to have been some concern to change the gear design, as seen by the engagement length. As for the tooth count who knows, perhaps it was easier and'or cheaper to mass produce this way. Without extensive and difficult measuring it is difficult to calculate the effective flow rate differences. The stiffer pressure regulator is to be expected considering the '25 has piston squirters, which aren't adopted in the '30.

See attached photos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Bl4cK32: The R33 pump I dissasembled above was from a series 1 1994 GTS25t, and has the significantly wider crank gear compared to the RB30...so its NOT the same. So is mine out of the ordinary? The engine details were definitely series 1, ie seperate ignitor module and older series TPS. So does that mean series 1's came out with both styles? Unfortunately I dont have an R32 series engine oil pump so I cant check for you...sorry. Regarding Sydneykids post in the link, he seems to be referring to DIAMETERS rather than the width of the lugs that I concentrated on measuring, and again, the pump above was a series 1 which seems to contradict what was mentioned. I'll measure the actual diameters of the '25 and '30 cranks to see if I can align with what SK suggests.

SteveL: Thanks! Thats what I was wondering. The engine builder who built the current RB30 short motor I'm runnning, had made a big song and dance about the differences in the RB30E and ET pumps, particularly the significant additional cost of the ET. I just went with his advice at the time, so from what your saying he appears to have been correct in his insistance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RB30 NA oil pump gear width is 10mm

RB30ET oil pump gear width is 12.5mm

IOW turbo oil pump gives higher flow for the same rpm.

Had both apart and measured them for myself.

I'm running an RB30ET oil pump on my RB30DET.

If that is the case then why when you call holden they tell you the pump for the NA and T is the same part number. The only difference is the pressure valve?!?

Nissan said the same thing about the RB20 turbo and non turbo pump.

I guess I'll have to wait until Bl4ck32 isn't looking and get the spanners out on his RB20DET oil pump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case then why when you call holden they tell you the pump for the NA and T is the same part number. The only difference is the pressure valve?!?

Well as I said, I've actually had both RB30 NA and turbo oil pumps apart and measured them for myself....I'm not sure what else I can say, other than dimensions I've listed confirm what I've read about the differences between RB30E and RB30ET motors (ie upgraded rod bolts, pistons etc....and an upgraded oil pump).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phantom, Both of the motors are being done at the same place at the same time. Andrew is going to pull Bl4ck32s RB20t pump apart and check clearances etc.. I'll get a few pics then.

If it is different I dont want to risk the RB30E's small tooth pump locking or not being able to handle high rev's, especially now that I have the RB30T's pressure spring.

Steve, I'm in denile. :D

I'll measure the gears of the SII RB30E pump tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phantom,

Thats the difference between the early and later pumps.

I've heard problems with the earlier style pumps cracking when over rev'd (miss-gear change 9000-10000rpm)

I had the engine builder measure the gears in my NA RB30E pump.

They are exactly 11mm wide.

He said he should have a turbo RB30 pump out the back and will measure that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a direct quote from an article on VL Commodes on the difference between the RB30E and RB30ET oil pumps:

'A larger oil pump (increased over the 10.8mm standard width by 2.6mm) was fitted to cater for the required turbo supply.....'

So 10.8mm for the NA pump and 12.4mm for the ET version. My measuring equipment is obviously not very accurate, but it's not that inaccurate that it would be out by around 2.5mm. Visually the gears were wider and that confirms the greater flow capabilities of the turbo pump (this would be expected given the greater demand of the turbo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...