Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have just thrown this theory up in classics re FMIC mounting but this might be a better place for more open discussion.

Has anyone considered, or researched the air flow into and out of intercoolers vs potential gain or loss of horsepower?

As gas cools and I guess air is no different, it expands and therefore needs a larger volume of space to flow at the same rate/speed. If the piping in & out of the intercooler is the same my theory is that the air flow would bog down so to speak as the cooler air trying to exit the intercooler would require more space to flow the same as it was on entry and if a larger diameter pipe is used on exit but reduced to go into the throttle body, the air speed would increase (venturi effect) but volume would decrease creating a potential loss of HP.

Any ideas people???????

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/154643-air-speedvolume-vs-hp/
Share on other sites

As gas cools, its density increases, and its volume decreases. Most intercooler plumbing is more than adequate for the flow, 2in nintercooler piping is enough for about 240rwkw at least without significant pressure drop across the piping. Nissan i think use 2 1/4 piping on the gtst standard( i think) so in theory that is fine for 300kw. The other way to think of it is standard gtr (3 1/4) or aftermarket fmic 3" piping is more than adequate for very high power, in 99% cases it would not be the limiting factor

cool air contracts not expands mate. Hot air expands as per the Ideal Gas law.

Not the way they approach exhaust gases.

Primarily why the exhaust piping after the manifold is bigger in dia than the manifold runners and the bigger the better in turbo cars.

Cheers, D

Not the way they approach exhaust gases.

Primarily why the exhaust piping after the manifold is bigger in dia than the manifold runners and the bigger the better in turbo cars.

Cheers, D

The Ideal Gas law still applies regardless of temp.

exhaust side is hot air which is opposite to the cooling at the IC which would seem fairly obvious.

no.. the air out of the "cooler" contracts and becomes more dence.

to get the same efect on the exaust side there needs to be a large quenching efect out of the turbo. ie a mild steel non insulated pipe. this creates a better pressure/heat diferance and therefor reduces lag.

no.. the air out of the "cooler" contracts and becomes more dence.

to get the same efect on the exaust side there needs to be a large quenching efect out of the turbo. ie a mild steel non insulated pipe. this creates a better pressure/heat diferance and therefor reduces lag.

lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
×
×
  • Create New...