Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The last time I bought some (in fuel containers) that pump wasn't locked .

The first time I went there they came running out thinking I didn't know what it was but once you tell them that you take full responsibility for using it theres no probs .

Recently I changed the fuel pump and hoses in my mid 80's flat four MON/RON test engine just to be sure .

I don't see too many probs with E85 and probes or cats from a longevity point of view , I haven't read anything that gave cause for concern . My father was a lab tech and said it (Eth) burns away to C02 and H20 .

The car to watch is that flex fueled Commode Door - if it ever gets into production .

I don't like your chances of getting the EPA/RTA to waive the converter even if the numbers come up right , I reckon they'll always argue that someone somewhere will stick ULP in (by accident or design) and they won't wear that .

Until they can come up with a way of forcing people to use E85 only in a car tuned specifically to run it I think legally the cat will have to stay .

My biggest issue with high ethanol content fuel is the water absorption one , as I said SK once mentioned an inline seperator of some sort and I really think we need to investigate that one .

Another significant one is ethanols higher vapor pressure and what it could do to the evaporative gear cars have - charcol canisters . There must be a way around that one too .

Personally I'm going to wait until E85 becomes more available because I can't see the point in tuning a road car for something that is only available through one or maybe two pumps in Sydney - none close to me .

It would be interesting to try one of those plug in conversion kits floating around in the US but not sure if any are out here yet .

Cheers A .

Okay then, for now i might keep the cat but i wont change it to the good compliance cat i used last time to pass the test, i will use the crappy high flow one that does not work as well when using this fuel. Surely it will still pass.

I am lucky because i can re-tune my car for cruise in probly around 10 minutes to get it running to the point where its driveable, then i can take it up to newcastle and chuck it on a dyno for a few hours and do the rest. I will only tune it to 18psi and about 300rwkw for the load side.

Will also put the 5gas on and do a dummy IM240 test when on the dyno and will post results.

This fuel might be a easy way out of passing the emissions test! will do some testing next thursday night, i will fill up my tank with it and a 20 litre drum to use once i get to newcastle. once i run out il load the 98 maps back up untill i can get more e85.

Do you think the 044 pump will handle it OK ?

  • 6 months later...

I passed another car through the IM240 Emission's test today, this one was road tuned around a industrial area in cardiff and went on to pass the test the next day!

Goes to show if you build a car and tune it properly you can make your car legal and get it engineered.

This car has 300rwkw.

ulook.jpg

  • 1 month later...

I might have missed it the results (although I thought I read all 5 pages), but I take it was a lot easier with E85 and what was the end deal whether or not the car would be required.

I might have missed it the results (although I thought I read all 5 pages), but I take it was a lot easier with E85 and what was the end deal whether or not the car would be required.

read my e85 thread. info in there

  • 7 months later...

how sure are we that they dont keep a record at all of cars that do it voluntarily and fail? e.g. if ive got a car thats currently engineered etc (not sure as to whether its engineered/passed for emissions), am i likely to get a letter in the mail that someone 'anonymously' tipped them off?

what was the booking procedure? is it just you book it and u go on a waiting list or whatever? no cost?

id like to see how good i can get the car in terms of compliance, but without returning everything to stock (given the point is to have a legal modified car, not one u swap parts on all the time).

(also the car im talking about is going to be under the 97-2003, which is THC (g/km): 0.26, NOx (g/km): 0.63, CO (g/km): 2.1, so it may be a bit harder/need more work to get it to pass)

Rest assured, the RTA are only there to do the emissions testing. they do not care if you come on your own and fail. They are not here to police the laws they are there to provide the services to us so we can make our cars legal.

The police and EPA are the ones you need to worry about. if you get sent to do a IM240 test by police or EPA and you fail then yes you will have problems.

There is NO risk at all of ringing the RTA booking a test and failing. The guys at the RTA like it when they see people go there to try and pass to engineer there car without any defects because they have had all sorts of troubles with fully sick defected car owners getting angry at them when they don't pass because now their rego is going to get cancelled or they have to go and do the test again

They do not even care about the modifications to your car, they will not issue you with a defect if you have a screamer pipe or BOV at the time of the test, THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE THERE FOR!!!

They are there to put the car in the booth test it and move onto the next one.

I have said this many times. Please stop asking this question !!!!

how sure are we that they dont keep a record at all of cars that do it voluntarily and fail? e.g. if ive got a car thats currently engineered etc (not sure as to whether its engineered/passed for emissions), am i likely to get a letter in the mail that someone 'anonymously' tipped them off?

what was the booking procedure? is it just you book it and u go on a waiting list or whatever? no cost?

id like to see how good i can get the car in terms of compliance, but without returning everything to stock (given the point is to have a legal modified car, not one u swap parts on all the time).

(also the car im talking about is going to be under the 97-2003, which is THC (g/km): 0.26, NOx (g/km): 0.63, CO (g/km): 2.1, so it may be a bit harder/need more work to get it to pass)

is this possible to do it vic??

i know you cant just keep going to the epa using there there dyno to make you car legal like nsw

but is it possible to make you car comply to legal emission in vic with a modifed car??

i believe this was talked about earlier in this thread.

READ

is this possible to do it vic??

i know you cant just keep going to the epa using there there dyno to make you car legal like nsw

but is it possible to make you car comply to legal emission in vic with a modifed car??

  • 8 months later...

hey is it the year of the car or the engine cause if it is the car you can put all your stuf in a datto and have the tune you want!!! [1969/75 no epa back then]

sorry to bump the thread but one day i want to do this to a 1200 coupe but unmodded one arent exactly a dime a dozen.

Emissions = engine in most cases.

However things like exhaust noise levels, depending on motor age etc, can vary.

Either way all emission controls must be inplace for the motor as you cannot go backwards in terms of motor (at least not in Vic anyway).

EG: You cant put a RB30E into a VN :D

other states vary so talk to your local engineer.

in NSW you can put any engine in any car, the problem is that you have to pass the emissions test for whatever is the latest model.

example, if you have a datsun 1600, 1970's and you put a 2008 model R35 GTR engine you will need to pass emissions for 2008 standard.

If you put a old pushrod 1980 engine in a 1995 skyline you will need to pass emissions for the 1995 skyline, and doing that with a 1980 pushrod engine will be a big mission.

Speak to your engine before you take any of this as gospel, I could be wrong but this is what i was told.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Given you already have the engine cross member to match and likely gearbox mount to. The SR20 has a head start on the RB in this case. They handle GREAT with an SR20, lots of fun.   One I did back in the day
    • have no doubt and wanted too trust me and may regret later not necessarily worried about weight (would be 8 kg ish total) it was more the $$ to do it properly is about $6 - $7K in hardwear need long 310mm stroke jacks etc - plus install and call me whatever im not doing it myself even if wanted too cant weld etc  - thats $10K installed vs fraction of that cost while Ive spent some money on this POS I actually really dont like doing so unless its got a large chance to make me go faster 😁 hey in still carting this things around on a 15 yr old rusted open trailer so I can spend on racing not buy a new trailer to look better the manual jacks Ive had done are heavy and take space but are transportable and usable anywhere - taking or organizing even compressed air let alone nitrogen which is more whats needed coming from Perth to Winton or Sydney or the like honestly just adds to my brain headaches/ hurts of organisation also ha 15 mins job will get down to 2 - 5 min job vs 1 min job for airjacks - all tradeoffs I spose
    • Purely out of curiosity, how do you know all this @dbm7? Do you work with automatic gearboxes professionally? This goes way way way beyond "I've had an automatic Skyline once and did some mucking around"
    • I'll just reiterate that it's best to do all the wiring diagnostics, before even thinking about buying replacement solenoids ~ that is, be absolutely sure the solenoid is bad.....ie; bad connector(s), rodents chewed through a wire, etc etc. If you don't so this, you can fork out all the money for solenoids, only to find something else is wrong (this'll make you cry if you pull the valvebody only to find a broken wire is at fault... ...some more glue on the solenoid packs -- this is the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly.... ...these are all shift solenoids ~ ostensibly they're the same as the shift solenoids from the 4-speed auto.... ...this is the RE4R01A solenoid set... ...with these, you have 3 shift solenoids attached to the plate, and the separate solenoid is the EPC solenoid (line pressure control) -- with both designs, the TC lockup clutch solenoid (also PWM so they could slide the clutch shut), is located on the lower valvebody half.... ...(story time)...back in the 90's, it was a common fault that the EPC solenoid (or TC-lock solenoid) would fail, but Nissan only sold them as part of the assembly (think ~$350 at the time) ~ thing was, Isuzu also used these boxes in light commercials, and you could buy the PWM solenoid as a separate part, so it was possible to buy/use that solenoid (around $65), and make it fit (remove the circlip, fit to old plate and deal with wiring)...making it a more cost effective repair. I've not seen the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly, but with the 4-speed RE4R01A it was possible to hack/fit a single shift solenoid onto an other working set, using a donor solenoid from another set with failed EPC....(by rights the whole set should be replaced), but it ends up being a question of how much life is left in the box itself ; sometimes it's a viable repair to fix one solenoid, just to get another 100k of road miles out of it before it needs first overhaul...other times the box is that old/worn, you're as well doing first overhaul and replacing the solenoids and starting fresh... What Nissan did here with the 5-speed, was relocate the EPC solenoid to the lower valvebody (next to the TC lockup solenoid), and stuck the direct-drive clutch solenoid (for the extra gear) where the EPC solenoid used to be on the 4-speed....I can only imagine they did this for serviceability ; the PWM solenoids are most likely to fail, and it's a doddle to drop the pan and change these out (as opposed to dropping the valvebody itself to get at a top mounted EPC)... ...also keep in mind, that some BMW 3/5 series & Mazda (and maybe some Ford/Mazda rebadges, not sure), also used the RE5R01A box under a different name/part number...not saying parts availability is any better, but sometimes it helps to know this when it comes to NOS floating about in the EU.... HTH  
    • FWIW, air jacks are actually pretty light and simple to add, they are just 4 hydraulic cylinders (often at the main cage A and C pillar points) and an externally accessible airline  - they make quick work a breeze
×
×
  • Create New...