Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The last time I bought some (in fuel containers) that pump wasn't locked .

The first time I went there they came running out thinking I didn't know what it was but once you tell them that you take full responsibility for using it theres no probs .

Recently I changed the fuel pump and hoses in my mid 80's flat four MON/RON test engine just to be sure .

I don't see too many probs with E85 and probes or cats from a longevity point of view , I haven't read anything that gave cause for concern . My father was a lab tech and said it (Eth) burns away to C02 and H20 .

The car to watch is that flex fueled Commode Door - if it ever gets into production .

I don't like your chances of getting the EPA/RTA to waive the converter even if the numbers come up right , I reckon they'll always argue that someone somewhere will stick ULP in (by accident or design) and they won't wear that .

Until they can come up with a way of forcing people to use E85 only in a car tuned specifically to run it I think legally the cat will have to stay .

My biggest issue with high ethanol content fuel is the water absorption one , as I said SK once mentioned an inline seperator of some sort and I really think we need to investigate that one .

Another significant one is ethanols higher vapor pressure and what it could do to the evaporative gear cars have - charcol canisters . There must be a way around that one too .

Personally I'm going to wait until E85 becomes more available because I can't see the point in tuning a road car for something that is only available through one or maybe two pumps in Sydney - none close to me .

It would be interesting to try one of those plug in conversion kits floating around in the US but not sure if any are out here yet .

Cheers A .

Okay then, for now i might keep the cat but i wont change it to the good compliance cat i used last time to pass the test, i will use the crappy high flow one that does not work as well when using this fuel. Surely it will still pass.

I am lucky because i can re-tune my car for cruise in probly around 10 minutes to get it running to the point where its driveable, then i can take it up to newcastle and chuck it on a dyno for a few hours and do the rest. I will only tune it to 18psi and about 300rwkw for the load side.

Will also put the 5gas on and do a dummy IM240 test when on the dyno and will post results.

This fuel might be a easy way out of passing the emissions test! will do some testing next thursday night, i will fill up my tank with it and a 20 litre drum to use once i get to newcastle. once i run out il load the 98 maps back up untill i can get more e85.

Do you think the 044 pump will handle it OK ?

  • 6 months later...

I passed another car through the IM240 Emission's test today, this one was road tuned around a industrial area in cardiff and went on to pass the test the next day!

Goes to show if you build a car and tune it properly you can make your car legal and get it engineered.

This car has 300rwkw.

ulook.jpg

  • 1 month later...

I might have missed it the results (although I thought I read all 5 pages), but I take it was a lot easier with E85 and what was the end deal whether or not the car would be required.

I might have missed it the results (although I thought I read all 5 pages), but I take it was a lot easier with E85 and what was the end deal whether or not the car would be required.

read my e85 thread. info in there

  • 7 months later...

how sure are we that they dont keep a record at all of cars that do it voluntarily and fail? e.g. if ive got a car thats currently engineered etc (not sure as to whether its engineered/passed for emissions), am i likely to get a letter in the mail that someone 'anonymously' tipped them off?

what was the booking procedure? is it just you book it and u go on a waiting list or whatever? no cost?

id like to see how good i can get the car in terms of compliance, but without returning everything to stock (given the point is to have a legal modified car, not one u swap parts on all the time).

(also the car im talking about is going to be under the 97-2003, which is THC (g/km): 0.26, NOx (g/km): 0.63, CO (g/km): 2.1, so it may be a bit harder/need more work to get it to pass)

Rest assured, the RTA are only there to do the emissions testing. they do not care if you come on your own and fail. They are not here to police the laws they are there to provide the services to us so we can make our cars legal.

The police and EPA are the ones you need to worry about. if you get sent to do a IM240 test by police or EPA and you fail then yes you will have problems.

There is NO risk at all of ringing the RTA booking a test and failing. The guys at the RTA like it when they see people go there to try and pass to engineer there car without any defects because they have had all sorts of troubles with fully sick defected car owners getting angry at them when they don't pass because now their rego is going to get cancelled or they have to go and do the test again

They do not even care about the modifications to your car, they will not issue you with a defect if you have a screamer pipe or BOV at the time of the test, THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE THERE FOR!!!

They are there to put the car in the booth test it and move onto the next one.

I have said this many times. Please stop asking this question !!!!

how sure are we that they dont keep a record at all of cars that do it voluntarily and fail? e.g. if ive got a car thats currently engineered etc (not sure as to whether its engineered/passed for emissions), am i likely to get a letter in the mail that someone 'anonymously' tipped them off?

what was the booking procedure? is it just you book it and u go on a waiting list or whatever? no cost?

id like to see how good i can get the car in terms of compliance, but without returning everything to stock (given the point is to have a legal modified car, not one u swap parts on all the time).

(also the car im talking about is going to be under the 97-2003, which is THC (g/km): 0.26, NOx (g/km): 0.63, CO (g/km): 2.1, so it may be a bit harder/need more work to get it to pass)

is this possible to do it vic??

i know you cant just keep going to the epa using there there dyno to make you car legal like nsw

but is it possible to make you car comply to legal emission in vic with a modifed car??

i believe this was talked about earlier in this thread.

READ

is this possible to do it vic??

i know you cant just keep going to the epa using there there dyno to make you car legal like nsw

but is it possible to make you car comply to legal emission in vic with a modifed car??

  • 8 months later...

hey is it the year of the car or the engine cause if it is the car you can put all your stuf in a datto and have the tune you want!!! [1969/75 no epa back then]

sorry to bump the thread but one day i want to do this to a 1200 coupe but unmodded one arent exactly a dime a dozen.

Emissions = engine in most cases.

However things like exhaust noise levels, depending on motor age etc, can vary.

Either way all emission controls must be inplace for the motor as you cannot go backwards in terms of motor (at least not in Vic anyway).

EG: You cant put a RB30E into a VN :D

other states vary so talk to your local engineer.

in NSW you can put any engine in any car, the problem is that you have to pass the emissions test for whatever is the latest model.

example, if you have a datsun 1600, 1970's and you put a 2008 model R35 GTR engine you will need to pass emissions for 2008 standard.

If you put a old pushrod 1980 engine in a 1995 skyline you will need to pass emissions for the 1995 skyline, and doing that with a 1980 pushrod engine will be a big mission.

Speak to your engine before you take any of this as gospel, I could be wrong but this is what i was told.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done a few BMS systems. Code in Canada use to force us to have any safety components outside of the PLC but with a code change back in 2018 I believe it was, we can now use safety PLC's to control everything. Sadly to your point, AB Guardlogix safety instructions for example are only available in ladder.  Machine safety is a very big thing here though, you're constantly forced to migrate to the next best thing by OSHA. I honestly prefer safety plc's, including anything from AB more then I do working with old school safety monitoring relays. PLC is only one portion of it, the rest of the electrical still has to follow to meet SIL (Mechanically linked dual contacts, bla bla)  Now tell me how to feel about safety over comm's (e.g Ethernet/IP CIP) on a unmaintained network haha
    • To your point, boolean logic. We're not only working with bools in ecu's, so it's very limiting. I wanted to setup a low WMI pressure alarm. After 1 second I want WMI line to hit 100PSI, 2 seconds 175PSI, etc. and trigger an alarm if it doesn't meet those thresholds. This would of taken me one very short line of text, but instead I had to bugger around with generic timers, conditions, etc. and so forth.
    • I much prefer that to an actual oil pressure issue, never would of thought it would of been a volt drop issue but SAU brains win again. Guess ill be turning down the oil pressure limit for the track and hunting some grounds. Ill hopefully update this thread with some high oil pressure and solid ecu voltage logs. 
    • You've just discovered a really good reason to tell yourself, yes, I do need to buy an aftermarket ECU. Put the MAF in the bin. Slap in the new ECU and have a think about what turbo sounds you prefer.  Do you want a 90's style BOV wooosh? Do you want a hektik tsututututu?  Mate, can't go wrong. Just gotta get that ECU and the world is your oyster. 
    • Hi. Iam just curisou about this topic. I saw this video. It is about Greddy Type FV2. I know that BoVs are about that sound but how and when to use it? I read some topic here and from what i have understand on stock RB with MAF there will be some "problems" if you use this BoV? It vents the air in to the atmosphere and the MAF on stock car needs this air back in to the intake and not out? Or is it wrong? If so...i saw you can put some adaptor to circule air back...but does that not "loose" that sound? I saw another BoV from Turbosmart and it has two "exhaust" like ports? One is for the stock tubing for letting air back and one is for "sound" and let the air in the atmosphere? Can someone please explain? This is the Greddy one:  And this is the Turbosmart.     THANK YOU!! EDIT: So i read about this topic some more and i if i understand that correctly: That Greddy can function either like BoV or 100% Bypass valve? And that Turbosmart is what they called hybrid so you can adjust what and how many air can be vented out or back in? Is this right? THX!
×
×
  • Create New...