Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have had a Cefiro and an R32 (2 door) but a mate has an R32 4 door.

Cefiro is a bit bigger and a lot of people really like the shape. their steering feels more lke a S13 than an R32 and they look awsome when modded. they have the same engine and box but there are a few differences

all the plugs on the cefiro loom are different to R32. different AFM, different cams and different ECU.

The cefiro makes more torque low down and the skyline ,makes more power up top in standard from but once you mod them they will be exactly the same.

cefiro has more interior room but less sporty interior.

it all comes down to what is available when you are ready to buy, I would have to say a kitted cefiro looks better than a R324door

there are more parts available for R32's but it is still easy to get bits for cefiros.

I am going to get flamed for this but the cefiro drifts better than a r324door and attracts less police attention and the insurance on them is less.

My 2c

This is one time where you should just go with what you think looks better.. Coilovers and other suspesion bits should be easier to find for Cefiro, and with slightly better prices than 32 bits if you look around. Good panels can command fairly high prices.

32's double wishbone front end geometry is said to change less under load(I.e drifting). GTR guards are a handy way to widen a four door 32.

Both are great cars. Just make sure you get a manual.

If I have a chance, I will select either R32 2 doors or Cefiro.

If you would like sporty looks, go for R32 2 doors. Otherwise Cefiro.

There're too many R32 2doors and 4 doors on the street.

Cefiro doesn't looks good unless they have a wild body kit. The one in D1 drifting.......forgot how does it called the body kit.

I don't personally like the tail light of the R32 4 doors, and the length of the car........don't too sure how's the actual length between 2 and 4 doors, but 4 doors looks a bit longer.

I don't personally like the tail light of the R32 4 doors, and the length of the car........don't too sure how's the actual length between 2 and 4 doors, but 4 doors looks a bit longer.

I heard it's only 40mm longer, but it always looks more than that so I looked it up:

GTS-T Type M Coupe Exterior dimensions (LxWxH) 4530 x 1695 x 1325 mm

GTS-T Type M Sedan Exterior dimensions (LxWxH) 4580 x 1695 x 1340 mm

So it's actually about 50mm longer, and 15mm taller... So I was right, it is more than 40mm, but not a lot more...

Thanks guys. i found in carsales.com.au tat 2 door is more expensive than 4 door. i also did some research than ceffy is heaviear than r32 4 door is tat true ? Also is ceffy parts find easier than r32 ? wat is the feel like both car ? i mean to compare them. i sat the cefiro seats b4. they r svcks. i hope r32 doest do tat though.

I also have few Question. If i use RB25 tubo into RB20 after fited do i need 2 change any thing else ? Like ECU, fuel pump,etc ?

Thanks guys on the opinion. i appriciated.

Cheers

Mick

Edited by Halo a
32's double wishbone front end geometry is said to change less under load(I.e drifting).

does it mean better 4 drifting

FKN A BROTHER,

Ive had both S13 Silvia, and ive got a R32 4 door now, and the difference in steering resopnse and over all feel of whats going on at the tyres is FAR FAR greater in the 32, *S13 and ceffy share the same suspension set up in the front*

Im in love with my 4 door, cant wait to dump it on my new suspension!!!!! as the feel will be erectifying......

As one bloke on here has in his sig, 4 DOORS 4 LYFE............

My 3c

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Getting the setup right, is likely to cost multiples of the purchase price of the vehicle.
    • So it's a ginormous undertaking that will be a massive headache but will be sorta cool if pulled off right. And also expensive. I'm sure it'll be as expensive as buying the car itself. I don't think you could just do this build without upgrading other things to take the extra power. Probably lots of custom stuff as well. All this assuming the person has mechanical knowledge. I'm stupid enough to try it but smart enough to realize there's gonna be mistakes even with an experienced mechanic. I'm a young bloke on minimum wage that gets dopamine from air being moved around and got his knowledge from a Donut video on how engines work.]   Thanks for the response though super informative!
    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
    • It's a place for non car talk. There's whoretown which is general shit talking. But also other threads coving all sorts of stuff(a lot still semi car related)
×
×
  • Create New...