Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

Long time reader first time poster. I have been doing some digging around into acts and legislations. The document that everyone seems to recommed is the EPA 2006 Modification guide which isn't actually a legal document but just a guide.

The Legislation the guide is 'suppose to follow' is the Environment Protection (Vehicle Emissions) Regulations 2003 which can be found here http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au (choose the 'E' and choose Legislation and go down to 60)

the PDF link I have added

http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/LTObject_Store/LTObjSt4.nsf/DDE300B846EED9C7CA257616000A3571/AD52E1CA8ECA6916CA2577610035F8CA/$FILE/03-10sr010.pdf

This is what laws EPA Victoria have and what all EPA testers must abide by.

Yes the document has the typical legal layout (which is painful to read) but from reading it and going over it with others. Most of what is in the EPA 2006 Modification guide isn't actually in the legislation it is suppose to follow. Please correct me if I'm wrong but if there is another Act or Legislation I have missed please include it.

There are so many points I can make about who and what has been deemed non-epa compliated but yet is not in there legislation. I know EPA is a VERY touchy issue but I am putting this out there hoping it could make a difference and help inform people what is the law.

Yes I have been playing to much Deus Ex: Human Revolution and think the EPA are evil conspiracists controlled by the Greens which control the Labor Government.

Well the few things i checked.

- Exhaust noise

- Vehicle Emission controls (which covers ECU, PCV etc)

Were the same in the Guidelines, and Stat Rules. And that is what 99% of people here are going to be pinned for ;)

Also the part you have referenced is simply the emissions part for Victoria dont forget. There is more too it like:

Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 2009

That one also makes reference to ADR's and other things about emissions etc. I really CBFd trolling through it to see exactly what is referenced but my guess would probably say enough to make it a headache to then go and check each ADR.

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys,

Just my luck i recieved a Noise Test request from the EPA. Thank god its not a full epa since im running a topmount with the rb30 inside. But i just wanted to be 100% sure, is the simple process of just showing up to a tester, getting it tested then giving the Certificate of Compliance to the EPA? No need to show the car?

Also, should i be worried about chucking the OEM r34 GTT exhaust back on with the amount of modifications i have done to the engine? (eg, gt35r, rb26/30, custom vband dump, ect) no chance of me damading the engine due to back pressure right? Obviously i wont be on WOT but what about the actual test at 4800rpm?

Where are they sending you for the test?

As i have said previously a mates GTR got done for noise, pod filters and a boost controller and the tester said if the car isn't stock its going to the EPA. He wanted stock Nissan cat or an EPA approved import cat with paperwork to prove it complied, stock FPR, stock exhaust, stock FMIC etc

Any "lenient" testers you recommend nismoid?

Although i have to replace my whole exhaust system, i just dont want any further issues with anything else. If thats even possible.

BTW ive been thinking about a racepace exhaust, do you recall what the ball park price they charge?

Been calling them 2 times a day for the last 2-3days but no one ever picks up or even returns my calls =[

No such thing as lenient either it's under or it's not

sorry alex let me be more spesific,

I dont want to draw attention to the fact that im running semi slicks, a top mount turbo ect, A noise tester wouldnt be concerned about this stuff right? Nor should he ask to see the engine?

Sorry mate, just saw your in Melbourne. If you were in Sydney i would say prepare the vaso as regardless of what they catch you for they rape you for everything up here, but Melbourne may be a bit different

Gosh man that must be a nightmare.

When i got home from work and opened up the mailbox to see a envelope from EPA . . . . my heart sunk and i was preparing for the worst. A full engine rip out and buying a new rb25 to put back in. To my relief it was just a noise test. I dont know how much longer i can go driving a car like this lol.

sorry alex let me be more spesific,

I dont want to draw attention to the fact that im running semi slicks, a top mount turbo ect, A noise tester wouldnt be concerned about this stuff right? Nor should he ask to see the engine?

They are testing for noise as i said.

That is all they care about.

go to exhaust city in chelt. great guy for epa noise testing. epa noise testers dont give a shit what your car looks like as long as it pasts test your fine. then you fax it through to epa and your cleared

I had an EPA for noisy exhuast on a VN (had a note through the mail saying the jacks had reported it), I took it to the local RACV place & he failed it so I made some restrictors & went back.

He told me he suspected that restrictors had been installed and threatened to report it to the EPA.

I took it somewhere else & they passed it no probs.

All they do is stick a microphone behind the exhause (they have measuring sticks to make sure it's in the right place), give it a couple of revs and that's it.

As said before, they don't care about anything else on the vehicle, just the noise level, think it's like 90dBA

As for roadies i's getting really hard to get one now because they have to take pictures.

Used to get them all day long up lol

When I bought my R33 they stung me for tint on the door too dark, new windscreen as the one on it was "sandblasted" & front brake discs.

Taking the tint off was fun (not).

  • 1 month later...

I just think its BS how this state/ country doesn't allow you to modify your own vehicle how you want. Not allowed 2 intake mods wtf?? not allowed this not allowed that... what if your car is 10 times safer than standard form then what??

As sad and stupid the laws are im still going ahead with my custom setup. Just puts a downer on it after reading a few posts about it all.

I wish there was good reasons behind not allowing after market modifications. :(

I just think its BS how this state/ country doesn't allow you to modify your own vehicle how you want. Not allowed 2 intake mods wtf?? not allowed this not allowed that... what if your car is 10 times safer than standard form then what??

As sad and stupid the laws are im still going ahead with my custom setup. Just puts a downer on it after reading a few posts about it all.

I wish there was good reasons behind not allowing after market modifications. :(

I think because of the following reasons:

1. Cars have safety features which you can affect by modifying. (Airbags, seatbelts, crumple zones, etc. etc.) Just think about that fully sick 5" monster tacho you see on some dash's. Then picture said tacho hitting the driver in the head when their whole body is flung forward because they rear ended someone.

2. Cars have pollution equipment in place to minimise how much nasty stuff you inhale when your mate drives off. CATs are fitted for a reason. Cars are tuned for pollution minimisation. etc.

3. Modifications done by back yarders can be dangerous as they haven't got full knowledge of engineering principles and the ADR's.

4. Putting modifications to driveline components (such as fully sik 22" chrome bling wheels) means other components wear out faster as increased loads contribute to extra stresses on the system. Again, your average backyarder (and some mechanics for that matter) have no idea when it comes to 'system engineering'. Hence why we have to use an automotive engineer for drastic and not so drastic changes.

I guess to sympathise with you about 2 intake mods.... Agreed, the EPA are a bunch of idiots. They should be educating car enthusiasts on how to get the most performance and fuel economy, but minimal impact on the environment. Don't get me started on Vicroads. Those guys have no idea what so ever. They brought in some rules to say cages weren't allowed to be fitted to cars (at all) because it affected crumple zones etc. Pity that means older cars (say pre 90's) which may not have crumple zones now could not have a cage if you wanted to drive it on the road. Fortunately they have reversed their decision. Twits!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
    • The consult isn't even OBD1. It's a Nissan Consult. Proprietary.   Re read everything I've said. I specifically say, put down the laptop/tablet. Understand, and review the issue first. Logging voltages is the same as logging the converted value. Things like O2 that you say to log, is unusable for this, whether it be the voltage, or the value the ECU thinks.   The fact you don't know how to diagnose without looking at the computer, is exactly what I've said multiple times is the issue for why techs these days can't diagnose the fun issues with cars.
    • Breather for it. If it's anything like the GTRs it should run up to the top of a bellhousing bolt.
    • What basics? With these OBD1 ECUs it's not like the ECU will give you any real clues, it's not really doing any sanity checking of sensors/sensor data. My experience is actually a lot of sensors tend to be the source of the issue first and foremost, and checking everything gives you a direction to investigate. MAF/O2/STFT/LTFT should all kind of make sense. You can try little tricks of the trade like tapping the MAFs to see if it triggers a stumble, things like that. But once you've done a compression test knowing whether you have an air leak or fuel delivery problem is kind of hard to narrow down without sensor data. And you don't really know if all your sensors are making sense unless you can interrogate the ECU directly about what it's seeing for sensor data.
    • Absolutely this. Yes, except not vacuum hose. Something oil/fuel safe is a better idea.
×
×
  • Create New...