Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the ultimate would be a 2jz with a 1jz head

wrong :D

Please have a search, it has been debated before and proven (flow numbers and all) to be a load of crap that the 1jz head is better than the 2jz head :laugh:

I came across a bloke that flow tested both the 1jz and 2jz heads.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=339560

Apparently the 1jz head > 2jz head is not the case. ;)

Pretty much :O

even though it hurts me to say, the 2jz is a much stronger motor all around.

Oil Delivery wise, pistons, rods, bearings, etc.

my mate - has a Supra with a T51r running 10s of a completely stock motor.

Search FUS01 on youtube, you'll see heaps of videos.

450rwkw and 900nm of torque.

1JZ and 2JZ are forged from factory very well designed engines.

I don't think the pistons are forged though - I think they are "pressed" not forged. But are still better than standard cast pistons like the standard skyline ones.

Cubes - TheRB30 that run 10s usually do it easy dude to such a light car.

Seeing a Supra with a HKS T51r, on a standard 2jz, completely unopened, running 10's at 134mph is really amazing.

Thats at 30psi also. Been for a run in it, and it scared the shit out of me...heh heh. As I said before, look up "fus01" on youtube - I uploaded those videos for him. Very close mate of mine. (Currently in Rehabilitation, poor bugger was almost killed in a head on. Was driving his brothers ute to airlie beach)

Dave whats your unbiased as asked for reason for this, facts not fiction would be nice

just the standard rb30 crank dude. put alongside a 2j crank its all clear. just the reliabliity at high revs. nothing else is wrong with it. a billit crank and its better than a 2j ;

I don't think the pistons are forged though - I think they are "pressed" not forged. But are still better than standard cast pistons like the standard skyline ones.

Cubes - TheRB30 that run 10s usually do it easy dude to such a light car.

Seeing a Supra with a HKS T51r, on a standard 2jz, completely unopened, running 10's at 134mph is really amazing.

Thats at 30psi also. Been for a run in it, and it scared the shit out of me...heh heh. As I said before, look up "fus01" on youtube - I uploaded those videos for him. Very close mate of mine. (Currently in Rehabilitation, poor bugger was almost killed in a head on. Was driving his brothers ute to airlie beach)

Its not that amazing, there are also rb25det's in r33 gts25t's running 10's on completly stock bottom ends aswell.

There is also a s13 silvia here in N.Z which is tubbed with a tube front end (could be a full tube chassis, would have to check) running 8.9 @ 144mph (i think he has gone even faster) using a completly stock rb30 bottom end with a r33 rb25det head and a t51r , last time i read about it it was making around 800hp atw and they wanted to keep pushing it to see how much the bottom end could take, im pretty sure it is now running meth aswell.

Edited by nizmo_freek
Its not that amazing, there are also rb25det's in r33 gts25t's running 10's on completly stock bottom ends aswell.

There is also a s13 silvia here in N.Z which is tubbed with a tube front end (could be a full tube chassis, would have to check) running 8.9 @ 144mph (i think he has gone even faster) using a completly stock rb30 bottom end with a r33 rb25det head and a t51r , last time i read about it it was making around 800hp atw and they wanted to keep pushing it to see how much the bottom end could take, im pretty sure it is now running meth aswell.

yeha running methanol..

THis supra is a bog standard engine running 30psi with a water methanol injection kit. Those STock RB25's last about 5 runs then they are dead.

THis supra has run down the strip at least 30 times. They did a comp test and it was perfect.

I still think if you want big power and longevity, the 2jz is the way to go.

yeha running methanol..

THis supra is a bog standard engine running 30psi with a water methanol injection kit. Those STock RB25's last about 5 runs then they are dead.

Thats bullshit, the guy on this forum (Mr331307, i think) was making over 500rwhp for a year and all he did with it was drag racing, burnouts and tons of dyno runs ,i wouldnt call that lasting 5 runs!

I don't think the pistons are forged though - I think they are "pressed" not forged. But are still better than standard cast pistons like the standard skyline ones.

Hey bud.. i was fairly certain that it was forged throughout the engine had a quick look on wikipedia they seem to confirm this please see link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_JZ_engine is a very interesting read.

Dan

yeha running methanol..

THis supra is a bog standard engine running 30psi with a water methanol injection kit. Those STock RB25's last about 5 runs then they are dead.

THis supra has run down the strip at least 30 times. They did a comp test and it was perfect.

I still think if you want big power and longevity, the 2jz is the way to go.

I agree with that completely. if you want it to last the distance i wouldnt push a 25 anywhere near as hard a 2jz

Edited by fEkuaR
Its not that amazing, there are also rb25det's in r33 gts25t's running 10's on completly stock bottom ends aswell.

There is also a s13 silvia here in N.Z which is tubbed with a tube front end (could be a full tube chassis, would have to check) running 8.9 @ 144mph (i think he has gone even faster) using a completly stock rb30 bottom end with a r33 rb25det head and a t51r , last time i read about it it was making around 800hp atw and they wanted to keep pushing it to see how much the bottom end could take, im pretty sure it is now running meth aswell.

Power to weight ratio mate, that's why he's running them times.

That's why i want to compare engines as is, not engines in the cars. The engine might be stock, but everything else also counts towards 1/4 mile times, i.e suspension setup, weight etc. In the end of the day that gives f*ck all of a comparison.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
  • Create New...