Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi,

first off i know nothing about suspension. im looking to get some coil overs. i found some that i think are alright but just wondering if these spring rates will be to stiff. are 10kg front and 8kg rear springs considered stiff or comfortable. if you can give me an answer based on personal experience that would be great. also if any tech heads are reading this would you be able to explain to me a little bit about the relationship between spring rates and ride quality, stiffness etc. i really would like to learn a lil bit more bout this kind of thing.

any help you can give will be great

thanks so much, Elli

Basically the higher the number, the stiffer it is. 8/6 will be fairly stiff and the stock springs are probably less than 1/3rd of those values. However the valving in the shocks will also determine the ride quality too which people tend to forget. Put a rock hard shock with a soft spring and it'll still break bones. And remember stiff does not mean you got a good handling ride.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I've read from one of SK's threads that factory suspension spring rates are around the 3k mark for Skylines. I've got Tein Super Streets which are 5k front and 4k rears. They are definately firmer than stock but still comfortable. 10k/8k I would assume be very much stiffer compared to stock suspension. You would feel every pebble on the road.

Stock rates are something like 125lb/in (2.2kg/mm) in the front of R32 gts-t. 10/8 is very stiff, you will lose compliance, so handling will be sacrificed and you will lose comfort. It's lose lose, so dont bother

I've got HKS Hiper D' Coilovers, and I THINK they're 9 or 10kg front, 6 or 7kg rear.

They're WAY too stiff to be comfortable, or even practical on the street! They're not oven helpful on the track - at Winton I was running the shocks at 2 or 3 clicks on the front, 5 clicks on the rear (out of 12), on the street it's 1 click front, 2 clicks rear.

I'm ditching the spherical-bearing shock mounts, putting conventional rubber-bushed mounts on the strut-tops soon, to try and get SOME small-bump compliance.

my suspension is 12kg front and 9kg rear and they are WAY too stiff

no comfort level at all

and lose out in handling because they soo stiff the car "bounces" round corners NOT COOL

am changing to Tein Super Streets soon 5kg front 4kg rear

i wouldnt go for that setup personally, unless its a dedicated track/drift car (even then you prob be better with 8/6)

RellikZephyr

10/8 would be hard work, even 8 and 6 ...but thats for sliding so its a different trip. I agree with Rellik, 5 and 4 Kg/mm springs are the go will still give you a firm ride, good for the odd track day but youd still be able to drive it on the street without pain. In the end you need to be honest and really look at what your going to do with the car. I bought the GB stuff from SK with some harder srpings and adjustable rear arms and it transformed my R.

I'm running 10/8 on my GTR, but I have the dampers (good ones) to control such a stupidly stiff spring. my GTR I only drive at the most 100km a week so it's not a concern for me, but if I drove it every day that set-up would get old fast. I would say unless you have some fancy pants mono-tube dampers with remote canisters and seperate bump and rebound adjustment then you are just asking for trouble with springs that hard, especially if you do a lot of street driving. in fact if you drive it more than 3 times a week I wouldn't consider anything harder than about 6/4 or 7/5.

actually I just realised you have a GTST not a GTR. in that case you could go a little softer even. 10/8 springs will give a poor ride and on the whole poor handling too.

It is interesting to note that Nismo, who we might agree knows something about Skylines, has spring rates of 6.0(f) & 6.7® on their S-Tune (sport) suspension and 9.0(f) and 8.0® on their R-Tune (Race) suspension.

'http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nismo.co.jp%2Fproducts%2Fproductguide%2Fbcnr33%2Fpartslist.html&langpair=ja%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools

I'm pretty sure BB runs R tune Ohlins which are nice ("fancy pants mono-tube dampers with remote canisters and seperate bump and rebound adjustment :D "). But BB does alot more track work than mine whereas my R is primarily a street car. I would probably go to 6kg/mm fronts as a max on roads around Perth. For other places it might be different but changes in surface heights and quality on our roads would make driving really uncomfortable... not to mention pot holes and traffic calming devices. Also Japanese roads are alledgedly alot smoother so the effect of stiffer springs is less pronounced and therefore acceptable. The Japanese, from what I've read, tend to control body roll more often with stiffer springs rather than stabilser/sway bars like Austarlians do. Horses for courses

I'm pretty sure BB runs R tune Ohlins which are nice. But BB does alot more track work than mine whereas my R is primarily a street car. I would probably go to 6kg/mm fronts as a max on roads around Perth. For other places it might be different but changes in surface heights and quality on our roads would make driving really uncomfortable... not to mention pot holes and traffic calming devices. Also Japanese roads are alledgedly alot smoother so the effect of stiffer springs is less pronounced and therefore acceptable. The Japanese, from what I've read, tend to control body roll more often with stiffer springs rather than stabilser/sway bars like Austarlians do. Horses for courses

yes, I have the nismo R-tune Ohlins. lol don't know about more track work, but definately less street so I guess the ratio of track - street is higher! I agree 6kg fronts is plenty stiff enough for a road GTR, and I think would even be too stiff for a road GTST.

I've been in a mates 34 GTR in japan with 12kg front and 10 or 11kg rear and even though their roads are mostly smoother there are still lots of crap ones too. it was very, very hard!

The Japanese, from what I've read, tend to control body roll more often with stiffer springs rather than stabilser/sway bars like Austarlians do. Horses for courses

Not to sidetrack this thread, but what kind of stabilizer do most people run? From looking around at the part sites there seems to be 3 choices - whiteline, cusco, and nismo. I think your point above is there is more than one element to a good performing suspension and you need to have synergy among the components, so less stiff spring can be offset by stronger bars.

10/8 is very stiff for a GTS-t, but with the right spring rates you'll be OK.

My Z33 runs 12/12, but since they came in a coilover kit the ride is actually quite good. I get quite a few compliments from people who say my coilovers ride remarkably well on the road.

What sized rims are you running? Bear in mind that the job of the suspension is to control the movement of the wheel, so the weight of the wheel you're running is also a consideration when it comes to optimal spring rates.

I'm running 17" rims at the moment, and I found it a little bumpier than stock (but well within the bounds of acceptability for my intended purpose). But when I borrowed a mate's 18" rims with semi slicks, the ride actually smoothed out over corrugations contrary to the accepted rule that bigger rims and ultra-stiff R-Comp sidewalls decrease ride comfort.

I remember reading somewhere that you can have wheels to big and heavy for your suspension, since your springs and dampers weren't engineered for that much unsprung weight and so its too slow to react. By the same token, having too little unsprung weight means your suspension will react too quickly as there's less inertia from the wheel, and your car ends up feeling oversprung and underdamped.

Which is why my current rims are for sale, pending my 18's arriving.

Its possible that 10/8 will be passable on 18-19" rims, as long as the dampers are well matched. I'm no suspension expert though, so this is all hearsay and personal experience. :P

Edited by scathing

The spring's job is to hold the car up and absorb suspension movements to keep the tyres in contact with the road surface. The shock absorber’s job is to control the spring and the chassis (both the sprung and unsprung portions of the chassis). So the shocks control the movement of wheels and tyres. Keep in mind that tyres themselves are springs and they have no damper to control them.

Just like any other form of unsprung weight, lighter wheels (and tyres) are easier for the shock to control. Shock absorber valving is not black and white, right or wrong. They operate in a window, so if you change the wheel weight (lighter or heavier) only a little bit (within the shock window) that should mean you will feel very little difference. But if you change the wheel weight a lot, then the shock may be operating outside its window. This is of course mostly noticeable with heavy wheels, the shock simply can't control them and traction is lost as a result.

Adjustable shocks are only worthwhile if you know what you are doing with the adjustments. Most of the time shocks have adjustment to cover up for their unsophisticated valving. This means they only work in a small range of conditions and so they have to have the adjustment. Bilsteins have very sophisticated valving and consequently have a large window that they operate well in. Simply put, they don't need adjusting.

So if you do change the weight of your wheels and don't have decent shock absorbers (with a large operating window) then you will have to compromise the rest of the set up by adjusting the shock to suite those wheels. If you don't have adjustment or good shocks, then the best tip is to keep any changes in wheel weight to a minimum.

:O cheers :no:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
    • Noted. Have noticed BMW are more 'high maintenance' for sure. They've attracted my attention as I think the used car prices seem reasonable vs other options, and the extra quality overall vs a commodore / camry / corolla or similar of the same vintage is appealing, especially the interior, and they are more on the sporty side whereas the others mentioned can be more cruising or economical A-to-B only.
    • Haha yeah I know, this is SAU after all, why are we talking about BMW's of all things!? I hear you on the 'don't have to worry about it' side of things. Having been fortunate enough to be have been able to buy a brand new motorbike or two...never really enjoyed them as much as I'd have liked as you worry so much about where you park it, will it get scratched, stolen, attempted theft, knocked over, etc...and yes dirty. Older less valuable bikes you can just go where you want and park it wherever and not really worry that much in comparison. And who cares if it gets dirty! Never owned a V8, and have had my eyes on VE / VF commodores for years but with their prices climbing so high, the M3 has come into focus more as prices are much closer than I've ever seen...is it a potential contender now?...of course need to factor in the S65 'maintenance' especially and like you said general M car 'tax'. One can dream anyway. But more on the reality front - did read the whole 330i thread as well and was a great read too, both threads enlightening as I've never even driven one of these cars! I do recall 330i didn't seem to have the same amount of issues for almost the same car (turbos and related differences notwithstanding)...perhaps down to getting it earlier in it's life so looked after better than the 335i? Perhaps so as your 130i has been good and quite similar, so finding a car that's been looked after well is the especially-crucial-BMW-first-step.
    • Nice. Dont worry about the time of not running. My current skyline hasn't run since I bought it. About 8 years ago.
    • It's also worth noting that I am heavily and unconditionally biased. I've had a lot of cars including some GTRs a fair while ago. I love my BMW's now a lot. They make no sense a lot of the time and the guys on here remind me regularly that I could get something else that does what I want better and cheaper. If you're going to take on an older BMW it's definitely a commitment. If you bail on it early you'll lose money and also the ability for it to put a smile on your face. Stick with it and it just gets better.  f**k I should get into advertising.  
×
×
  • Create New...