Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

I was just wondering if some or most of you guys who have R33 GTST have upgraded your clutch and brakes from the stock ones. Have most of you upgraded cos you have greatly increased boost/power and it is a requirement? Have you found them to be a great investment?

Have you guys also upgraded your suspension too? Is it a good upgrade to consider or does the stock suspension work good enuff?

Also what have you changed these parts to?

Thanx

Kev

I suppose it depends on what you want to do with a car.

Oh... and i drive an R32, and on the street i drive like Morgan Freeman in Driving Miss Daisy.

Suspension.

I was happy with King Springs, little lower for mainly aesthetics, for the street. Drove nice, a little less roll, but no susp setup will allow you to fly around corners on Syd roads, (nor should you really want to) bumps/potholes/children. With me behind the wheel i think i would have struggled to find the limits of the chassis with this setup on the road.

But when i first started venturing onto the track i found the car wasnt that impressive so made sensible mods to improve handling whilst still preserving my sanity on the street. Bilsteins, sway bars, strut braces, bushes, alignment

Clutch

My thing was starting to show duress after numerous trips to the track. So before it caused possible gearbox damage i upgraded to a 6 puck sprung centre clutch with lightened flywheel.

For the street though my stock clutch was holding up fine remembering i only have IC/exhaust/filter/boost.

Brakes

I would like to believe that you would never approach the limits of the Nissan brakes on the street, (if serviced and functionining to their potential) As they held up extremely well on the track. You would have to show some mercy to make sure they lasted 20 minutes of abuse, but i cant see such a level of performance ever being required on the street.

That said when i cooked some pads one day at the track i did some damage to rotors as well, so seemed like the time to upgrade. Having rebuilt calipers/master cylinder/booster and running braided lines i was advised that larger rotors is all that i needed. So now have 330 x32mm rotors and the car stops like a champion for full 20 minute session (remember i only have about 150rwkws at best) Dont have to show them any mercy at all.

I have noticed that the brakes do work harder when running good rubber on the track vs crappy road rubber, which i suppose makes sense. With say another 40-70+kws and running soft rubber i have been advised that better calipers and floating discs would be ideal.

So me thinks for the road, provided the OE gear is in good nick, then springs and clutch (say around $1000) is all that you would need. Brakes some good pads and fluid works wonders.

But if you have the coin...

Thanks for the opinions roy.

I probably wouldn't venture on the track anyways, so I guess some of the performance improvements you experienced would not be felt on normal roads.

U reckon there is any need for strut braces on the road? (or do they just look cool in the engine bay) :D

Brake upgrade: The DA slotted rotors and EBC greens front and rear have dramatically improved the braking performance. Shorter stops, less fade. Pads will squeek at low speeds but stop after a couple of hard stops as dust is removed.

Initial bite tends to cause front lock up when emergency stops, not a problem for me as I have ABS, but can be avoided by applying brake pressure lighter and ramping up as weight tranfers to front (just like a motorcycle).

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
×
×
  • Create New...