Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it may not be factory, but i have seen one before on an R32 m spec. it was making 210rwkw. also came with the electric spoiler.

I thought it was factory.

the one i saw was exactly like the one listed but also had a shroud. it is not a backyard job. look at the end tanks and mounting hole.

Still looks the goods to me

overall heat transfer coefficient for a wall can be calculated as:

1 / U A = 1 / h1 A1 + dxw / k A + 1 / h2 A2 (1)

U = the overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)

A = the contact area for each fluid side (m2)

k = the thermal conductivity of the material (W/mK)

h = the individual convection heat transfer coefficient for each fluid (W/m2K)

dxw = the wall thickness (m)

Aluminium Coefficiant: - 221 W/mK

When aluminium is used as a heat exchanger in ambient air medium

U = 1 / (1 / hA + dxw / k + 1 / hB) (1b)

Taking the total medium transfer to: U = 25.0 W/m2K

even if the air temp in the cores is 70deg C the total increase of air temp traveling thru the second core from the first will be nothing compared to the temp coefficant.

in other words....

it will perform very well.

Well the ARC type are 110mm thick. This is 130mm (2 x 65mm) . The air flows through the fins from frotn to back - shouldn't be a real issue.

It won't be quite as good in cooling as a taller skinnier cooler but it should flow ok.

Might connect up a water spray for hot days...

Way I see it if it can handle 220rwkw I'm laughing.

Benfits:

1. easier to fit

2. looks stock

3. wont lose response like with a FMIC

3. good for insurance etc.

downside:

1.not as good cooling

hmm well i had a r34smic, then upgraded to a fmic (r34 is exactly 61% bigger in core size btw) but maybe i'm not seeing things correctly but that piping (entry and exit points) doesn't really look like it will bolt up correctly to the stock 33 piping?

Maybe its a r32 one? as i recall they have a different piping setup to the 33/34

I put a 34 SMIC in my car, and it pushes right up against the front bar. This thing looks like it would want to sit much further forward?

The distance from the inlet/outlet to the back of the core looks the same as my 33 and 34 cooler, so the extra thickness APPEARS to take more space at the front?

Definitely keep us updated on the flow results! I'm keen to know how much better this 34 cooler is over the 33 one, regardless of the dual-core setup.

I put a 34 SMIC in my car, and it pushes right up against the front bar. This thing looks like it would want to sit much further forward?

The distance from the inlet/outlet to the back of the core looks the same as my 33 and 34 cooler, so the extra thickness APPEARS to take more space at the front?

Definitely keep us updated on the flow results! I'm keen to know how much better this 34 cooler is over the 33 one, regardless of the dual-core setup.

cant comment on the stock bar as i've always had a aftermarket one (as pictured in my av) but i did measure back to back the cores (stock 33 vs 34) and from memory the 34 core is a couple of cm taller (so sits lower) and 2cm thicker, but no wider,so would sit a tad forward yes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...