Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As you all know on the rb25det's the exhaust cam gear is electronically adjustable and both of the cam gears are idenitcal, so i was wondering if it were possible to use a second adjustable cam gear set up from the exhaust cam and use it to control the intake cam and then hook it up to i think apexi do a cam controler computer or something for like $200.

If this were possible would it give you any advantage or and more power?? i guess using it you could set a small cam on idle so it was smooth at idle then later in the rev range open it up more

what are your ideas im not thinking about doing it just got into my head the otherday and i was wondering if it were possible

The intake cam is the only cam that is variable on the RB25 and it has an oil control solenoid that operates the advance/retard if you look at your motor you can see it at the front of the motor on the head with a black and brown plug, this is what swithces the control solenoid at <4500 rpm. the other half of this system is in the actual pully itself. and the inlet and exhaust pulleys are different for that reason.

I think your looking at the Cam Angle Sensor.

Cheers Matt.

Edited by mattymagoo22

To disable the vct, simply unplug the soleniod. I believe that it would most certainly be possible to do a dual vct setup, all it needs is two inlet cams with camwheels, a soleniod to switch the oil pressure(with a bleed orifice to relieve the pressure) and an iol port drilled into the head at the appropriate spot. Would probably want to run biggish cams to make the most of it though. Also need a jaycar controller, and a lot of dyno time.

opes i got the cams around the wrong way i knew what i was thinking in my head but not on the car, so it would be possible, would it give many gains thou or would it be just another thing that could go wrong, the out lay doesnt seem that expencive could be done for possibly around $1500 if some of the work was done by yourself, do you know of anyone whos done it before? the car would be able to change the power-ban to a lot higher and pull harder without loosing your idle, it must not be that good an idea if no-one out there is doing it, love to hear from someone whos tried

HKS do a kit, but its around $8000. You could probably do it for $1500 if you have the head off already, already have an aftermarket ecu and know someone with a dyno, although to make it worthwhile, i would only think there would be a real benefit if you are making over 300rwkw, and are planning on fitting some 272's. Remember you dont only have to set the switch on pionts, but also adjust them (i dont know if all the vct gears are adjustable)Icould see a whole day of stuffing around on the dyno to gete the most benefit. Does anyone know how much the vct adjusts the cam timing by? Remember you will also need to sort out somethig for the cas.

in theory its a great idea big cams with good drivabilty down low and high power potential up high but you'd be asking for trouble as adriano mention the exhaust cam controls the CAS to time your motor so could cause problems

I know subaru 2.5 turbo motor has variable cam timing on all 4 cams and has the control on the insde of the cam gear it uses cam and crank sensors with the mgnetic pick up on the actual outside of the pulley so that the cam can advance or retard without affecting the sensors......

Not sure what the advance is but would be good to know, anybody know how much the cams advance on the rb25??????????????

I suppose anything is doable with enough know how and money.

What you are proposing re big and small cam isn't how the nissan system works though, all it does is advance and retard the inlet cam there by reducing/increasing the overlap.

You would have the added complication of having to run the cas off something other than the normal drive on the end of the exhaust cam as 1) it will be blocked by a vct gear now, and 2) you cant drive it off the cam anymore anyway as that is moving around, you'd need to drive it of the outside of the gear which would stay constant in relation to the crank.

Second consideration; by the time you do all this and spend the money, the guy who put in cams for $1k will still make more power pretty much everywhere with very little effect on idle quality, fuel economy....well that's a different story if your system is set up right.

So by the time you remove and machine the head to accept a second solenoid and give oil a way to get into the cam gear, get an oil feed up to it, get a second inlet cam to replace your stock exhaust cam as well as the new vct gear, then a couple of controllers, head gasket, etc i figure you will be up over 1k already not including any labour, a couple of weeks of down time for the car, yadda yadda, vs the drop in cam option, drive in drive out in under a day for less money ex labour (which will be significantly less too) and then the tune for each.

Not worth it for me.

Edited by BHDave

its not a new idea. toyota is a local company who do it well. Honda have done it for quite some time and then you have one of the masters of doing it.. BMW.

the humble RB just wasn't designed to do it.. and for the pain and headache of getting it all up and running.. y would anybody bother. cam upgrades are a cheaper and easyer optioon. sure if you had a maxium effort engine that was already stretched to its limit and you were desperatly tring to get a less peaky engine, that had a wider torque curve, then i would go for it!

but good luck with that one.. there is always somedody thinkin outside the square. Go for it and be famous for the first bugga to do it. make sure u take heaps of photo's so we all can copy u!

any other thoughts :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 馃槃 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 馃槃 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 馃槃 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
    • Probably too late to reply to this, but worth a try. It's not calliper flex, the calliper as a whole is moving so it has to be calliper mounting bracket flex.  Calliper mounting brackets are designed to stop the calliper rotating, they don't need to be designed heavy duty to stop the calliper moving in and out.  Whatever it is is not the major cause of poor pedal feel, the outer pistons are moving towards the disc rotor the same amount as the inner pistons are moving away from the disc rotor.  Hence no change in fluid usage, what extra fluid is needed to move the outer pistons is recovered from the inner pistons. For a calliper to move as a whole by far the most common reason is the rotor is not perfectly centred in the calliper.  The first thing I check is that hub face is perfectly clean, bare metal, where the rotor hats contacts it.  Then I check the that rotor is firmly held in place by at least 3 wheel nuts (or equivalent). If all of the above are confirmed to be in perfect alignment then I would check the piston sizes and ensure that the 3 inner pistons and 3 outer pistons have matching diameters (eg; 28/32/36mm).  I have seen a no name 4 spot calliper that had 1 of the 4 pistons a different diameter. Maybe I missed it, are both the callipers exhibiting the same problem? I would remove the transfer pipe and inspect it to make sure that there are no restrictions. Maybe you already have but if not I would return them with the video and have them confirm all of the above.   Hope that helps Cheers Gary    
    • If you have the original log book and it didn't have a chassis number quoted, then no money required.  I have "rechassied" a number of race cars, no problem as long as you have the original log book.   Cheers Gary
  • Create New...