Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As you all know on the rb25det's the exhaust cam gear is electronically adjustable and both of the cam gears are idenitcal, so i was wondering if it were possible to use a second adjustable cam gear set up from the exhaust cam and use it to control the intake cam and then hook it up to i think apexi do a cam controler computer or something for like $200.

If this were possible would it give you any advantage or and more power?? i guess using it you could set a small cam on idle so it was smooth at idle then later in the rev range open it up more

what are your ideas im not thinking about doing it just got into my head the otherday and i was wondering if it were possible

The intake cam is the only cam that is variable on the RB25 and it has an oil control solenoid that operates the advance/retard if you look at your motor you can see it at the front of the motor on the head with a black and brown plug, this is what swithces the control solenoid at <4500 rpm. the other half of this system is in the actual pully itself. and the inlet and exhaust pulleys are different for that reason.

I think your looking at the Cam Angle Sensor.

Cheers Matt.

Edited by mattymagoo22

To disable the vct, simply unplug the soleniod. I believe that it would most certainly be possible to do a dual vct setup, all it needs is two inlet cams with camwheels, a soleniod to switch the oil pressure(with a bleed orifice to relieve the pressure) and an iol port drilled into the head at the appropriate spot. Would probably want to run biggish cams to make the most of it though. Also need a jaycar controller, and a lot of dyno time.

opes i got the cams around the wrong way i knew what i was thinking in my head but not on the car, so it would be possible, would it give many gains thou or would it be just another thing that could go wrong, the out lay doesnt seem that expencive could be done for possibly around $1500 if some of the work was done by yourself, do you know of anyone whos done it before? the car would be able to change the power-ban to a lot higher and pull harder without loosing your idle, it must not be that good an idea if no-one out there is doing it, love to hear from someone whos tried

HKS do a kit, but its around $8000. You could probably do it for $1500 if you have the head off already, already have an aftermarket ecu and know someone with a dyno, although to make it worthwhile, i would only think there would be a real benefit if you are making over 300rwkw, and are planning on fitting some 272's. Remember you dont only have to set the switch on pionts, but also adjust them (i dont know if all the vct gears are adjustable)Icould see a whole day of stuffing around on the dyno to gete the most benefit. Does anyone know how much the vct adjusts the cam timing by? Remember you will also need to sort out somethig for the cas.

in theory its a great idea big cams with good drivabilty down low and high power potential up high but you'd be asking for trouble as adriano mention the exhaust cam controls the CAS to time your motor so could cause problems

I know subaru 2.5 turbo motor has variable cam timing on all 4 cams and has the control on the insde of the cam gear it uses cam and crank sensors with the mgnetic pick up on the actual outside of the pulley so that the cam can advance or retard without affecting the sensors......

Not sure what the advance is but would be good to know, anybody know how much the cams advance on the rb25??????????????

I suppose anything is doable with enough know how and money.

What you are proposing re big and small cam isn't how the nissan system works though, all it does is advance and retard the inlet cam there by reducing/increasing the overlap.

You would have the added complication of having to run the cas off something other than the normal drive on the end of the exhaust cam as 1) it will be blocked by a vct gear now, and 2) you cant drive it off the cam anymore anyway as that is moving around, you'd need to drive it of the outside of the gear which would stay constant in relation to the crank.

Second consideration; by the time you do all this and spend the money, the guy who put in cams for $1k will still make more power pretty much everywhere with very little effect on idle quality, fuel economy....well that's a different story if your system is set up right.

So by the time you remove and machine the head to accept a second solenoid and give oil a way to get into the cam gear, get an oil feed up to it, get a second inlet cam to replace your stock exhaust cam as well as the new vct gear, then a couple of controllers, head gasket, etc i figure you will be up over 1k already not including any labour, a couple of weeks of down time for the car, yadda yadda, vs the drop in cam option, drive in drive out in under a day for less money ex labour (which will be significantly less too) and then the tune for each.

Not worth it for me.

Edited by BHDave

its not a new idea. toyota is a local company who do it well. Honda have done it for quite some time and then you have one of the masters of doing it.. BMW.

the humble RB just wasn't designed to do it.. and for the pain and headache of getting it all up and running.. y would anybody bother. cam upgrades are a cheaper and easyer optioon. sure if you had a maxium effort engine that was already stretched to its limit and you were desperatly tring to get a less peaky engine, that had a wider torque curve, then i would go for it!

but good luck with that one.. there is always somedody thinkin outside the square. Go for it and be famous for the first bugga to do it. make sure u take heaps of photo's so we all can copy u!

any other thoughts :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...