Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There are a couple of autronics dealers in perth - go see them. If they say the wolf is no good, ask them why, find out what the autronic has to offer that wolf doesnt.

Then go and see Steve, or you could do it the other way around.

That is a pretty big price difference, you would expect alot better funcionality.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The current software version of my wolf is V4.51. I have heard that V4.53 has been released, but only improves the features for the tunner.

My tune did only cost $200, but as previously stated (and demonstrated on the graph) i am not 100% happy with it. Doen't get me wrong, the engine makes the power, and is tunned at a safe level. Maybe mine was a little cheaper as the tunner may have installed another car's tune, with similar mods, and then fine tunned it for my car, thus saving alot of time.

As yet i am not using temp. compensation or boost controller.

The car is booked to be serviced, retunned and above options to be installed.

Hi guys, we get this sort of question all the time. People always ask how come the Wolf/Link/Microtech is $1.5K and the Motec/Autronic is $3K? Basically they all run the engine OK, are easily programmable and reliable in operation.

What the Motec/Autronic's offer is additional features such as 3 types of antilag, faster processing (32/64 bit), 2 types of launch control, 3 types of traction control, data logging, programmable auxiliary outputs for control of basically anything you want (eg; pit lane speed limit), free software upgrades, programmable auxiliary inputs for almost anything you want (eg; we use fuel pressure compensation), mutiple/staged injector firing (eg; we run short and long injector positions), closed loop tuning (plug a F&W lambda sensor in and go for a drive and they self tune).

If you are going to use those sorts of features, then the Motec/Autronic is the best level of ECU for you.

The advantage of Power FC's is of course the use of AFM's, there is simply no more accurate way to measure the airlow into an engine. MAP's are a compromise and simply not as accurate. Makes little difference to max power, but we find AFM control much easier to make the car "nice" to drive.

Hope that helps.

Sydneykid,

I think with the new generation of ECU's that the gap between the cheaper end of the market (Wolf, Microtech etc) and the most expensive end (Motec, Autronic) have narrowed significantly.

The new plug'n'play wolf can do data logging, have programmable auxillary outputs, free firmware upgrades, programmable auxillary inputs, staged injectors and closed loop control.

Yes the SM2 and Motec have some additional features which may be worth considering for serious racers, but for most street-car applications I don't see then extra cost as justified.

I'm glad to see that all ECU manufacturers have lifted there game, and we now have a range of excellent ECU's to choose from.

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, I'm with you, as I said "If you are going to use those sorts of features". We keep it simple, for road/race Skylines we use PFC's, for race only Skylines we use Motec's.

Dyno Dave can tune any ECU, but it makes it easy for us if we only need two types of software and only need to keep abreast of 2 development programs. My brain would start hurting if I had to follow 5 or 6 programs. Ken and Phil are working really hard on keeping some sort of gap between Motec and the lower end ECU's. As an example we find the new digital trigger system on the Motec M800 is a big advantage. The new NOS control is very effective, as is the stepper motor control. The telemetry also works much more reliably than previous versions.

I can't wait to try the new electronic throttle system, I am looking forward to being able to set up a hi power GTR engine such that half throttle always gives half power. Instead of the manual throttle where you get 10% power sometimes and 90% power other times, both at half throttle.

So yeh, I agree that the lower end ECU's are getting more sophisticated and better value for money every day, but there is a place for the top end units "if you can use the features".

Hope that adds to the discussion

I really appreciated these last few posts. Thanks.

The most interesting diferences being the 3 types antilag and 3 types traction control, auto tuning and availablilty of NOS control.

Am I right in assuming that a microtech could be specially programmed for one type of antilag, but not the traction control?

what is ?? multiple staged injector firing (long and short) what is this for? What does it do?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...