Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am thinking of running my car on this fuel.

I know it will make it run leaner per the same amount on fuel injected due to the oxygen content.

Say I was running a 12.5:1 AFR with ultimate, what would it be running at if I swapped to E10 with no tuning changes? I'm just trying to get a rough idea how much more fuel flow I would require.

After AFR's have been restored. Will it take more or less ignition advance than normal fuel?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/
Share on other sites

Mate, i read an article in one of the performance mags where they got an R32 GTR and ran a full tank of Optimax and put it on the dyno and it spun up about 250Kw at all 4. They drained the tank and put E10 in but didn't change the amount of fuel and advanced the timing due to the fuel being more stable and got an extra 20Kw at the treads by just changing fuel and timing. If your interested i'll try and find the article.

I'm running the E10 in my R32 GST-T with HKS2540, FMIC, 9 pound boost, full 3 inch with dump pipe and i think there onto something coz my car runs better in general revs out smoother and get better economy, I can't wait till i get enough money together to get my Apexi Power FC tuned (still on the shelf in my room).

Hopefully i can get the tuner to do a before and after dyno read out with different fuels.

Anyway thats my 2c, good luck :domokun:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2923572
Share on other sites

I think I've read the same article. I believe the outcome was it let you run timing similar to race gas but compared to the same amount of petrol it runs a few points leaner so you have to add slightly more to get the AFR's right.

Liter for liter E10 has less energy content over non-ethanol fuel so you will lose some economy .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2923653
Share on other sites

Mate, i read an article in one of the performance mags where they got an R32 GTR and ran a full tank of Optimax and put it on the dyno and it spun up about 250Kw at all 4. They drained the tank and put E10 in but didn't change the amount of fuel and advanced the timing due to the fuel being more stable and got an extra 20Kw at the treads by just changing fuel and timing. If your interested i'll try and find the article.

I'm running the E10 in my R32 GST-T with HKS2540, FMIC, 9 pound boost, full 3 inch with dump pipe and i think there onto something coz my car runs better in general revs out smoother and get better economy, I can't wait till i get enough money together to get my Apexi Power FC tuned (still on the shelf in my room).

Hopefully i can get the tuner to do a before and after dyno read out with different fuels.

Anyway thats my 2c, good luck :)

Was that E10 98 or E10 100? It would be sweet if you could find the article.

Frost. Yeah it might chew a little bit more but it costs way less from united servos.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2923768
Share on other sites

haven't used 98 E10, use 100 E5 (Shell V Power Racing) all the time. Slight change in A/F ratios (leaner) not enough to stress over. But big advances in ignition timing, much faster boost build (standard turbo at 10 psi at 1,800 rpm) and much better throttle response.

Shell V Power Racing works great on the default Power FC Maps, virtually zero knock.

:( cheers :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2925740
Share on other sites

haven't used 98 E10, use 100 E5 (Shell V Power Racing) all the time. Slight change in A/F ratios (leaner) not enough to stress over. But big advances in ignition timing, much faster boost build (standard turbo at 10 psi at 1,800 rpm) and much better throttle response.

Shell V Power Racing works great on the default Power FC Maps, virtually zero knock.

:happy: cheers :laugh:

Nice! So if you were running on the edge of detonation boost wise (23psi :laugh: ), E10 will give you a safety margin over normal fuel? (providing AFR's are the same).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2926147
Share on other sites

Nice! So if you were running on the edge of detonation boost wise (23psi :happy: ), E10 will give you a safety margin over normal fuel? (providing AFR's are the same).

Yep.

You might need to add a tad more fuel. Only way is to check it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2926247
Share on other sites

So if im tuned for bp98 and i use shell100 i should be ok and still have safe a/f ratio.

DennisRB30, i would assume the extra 2 octane in shell100 will help less knock slightly, how much???

Well yeah. Thats comparing 100 octane to 98 octane so that would be a given. I am talking about 98 octane E10 fuels like boost 98 from United servos.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2926989
Share on other sites

Ethanol does have better anti-knock properties than regular petrol.

RON : 129 - MON : 102

As for tuning, ethanol is 35% oxygene but also contains less energy than regular automotive fuel.

Typical automotive fuel contains around 45 MJ/kg where as ethanol contains only 26 MJ/kg.

This would indicate that, like methanol, a richer a/f mixture would be required to obtain maximum power.

However in blends as low as 10% it's probably not such an issue.

Long story short, yes you can run a bit more timing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-2927100
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Everything I read about "E10" suggests that it's not enough ethanol to get back what you lose consumption/power wise . Most of those people were not talking about 98E10 , mainly the lower octane stuff .

When they say 98E10 I'm curious to know what grade ULP they mix the 10% ethanol with to end up at the 98 oct number . The cynic in me reckons its whatever the cheapest means of making something that engines can burn and be tested to show 98 octane numbers . The best option would be blending straight ethanol with 98 oct PULP but where can you get pure anhydrous ethanol so you can tip 5.5L in yourself ? It's possibly better to work how how much E85 contains 5.5L of ethanol , pour that in a fill up with say BP 98ULP .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-6890049
Share on other sites

They should mix just fine in the tank. Id put the ethanol in the tank then the ulp ontop.

I ran 100E10 from united. I got better fuel economy amd my knock which was randomly present in the upper rpm was gone. I will be filling up with that fuel when ever I pass the station.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157439-98-e10-tuning/#findComment-6890771
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I suppose that's true. Barring almost any situation, I'll never sell so what the market does is kind of irrelevant to me. It's possible I'd make most of my money back. That spreadsheet I mentioned? Maybe I could make back more than what the car's total costs thus far are, but the parts and all that is possibly a different story... Thanks for reading. It was certainly a good moment and just makes the ties to the car that much stronger. It's exciting that the option will be there to bring it over, however I have some plans with a shop that may end up keeping the car there longer, not sure. Coupled with the fact I want to move there and haven't solidified any path yet. So in a way, it feels like I'm in a limbo state that is uncertain; time will tell.
    • No worries, everything worked out in the end. I just wanted to make the point that it doesn't matter where it comes from (I.E Australia), it can be broken or improperly built. I would still purchase from these companies in the future. B2R - Not certain how that finished, this was on a car I wired a few things and street tuned. I know the owner ended up shipping the motor back to Australia for investigation. Hopefully some of it is covered under warranty.  Turbosmart - I always pressure test everything that goes on my car. It's a habit from my career in oil and gas. I run two 40mm's and both had major leaks from the actuator to exhaust portion through the shaft. I returned both, they shipped me back two and one was leaking and the other had a 38mm top (40mm gate with 38mm actuator cap, no idea how that happens). Eventually after a lot of back and forth I found myself with two non-leaking gates. I believe this happens a lot more then people would like to believe but you would never know if you don't pressure test them prior to installation. Crank Motorsport - Issued a full refund and let me keep the seat rails. I turned them into scrap metal for other projects. GKTech - Shipped me out a replacement and asked that I modify it as per my idea and that they would do the same for a future revision. ATP - Can just needed a large shim to bolt up properly.  Haltech - They started an actual proper Beta channel for firmware's a few months back and stopped using the general public for testing. I'm now much happier.  Speedtek - f**k Speedtek. I would love to watch them burn.     
    • I've got a Turbosmart wastegate, ATP catch can, many GK Tech parts and Haltech everything. Everything's been perfect, sorry to hear your experience wasn't the same
    • The only high-power RB I've personally seen go pop after running for all of an hour on a dyno was built by B2R, while being remotely tuned by B2R. The only wastegates I've ever had leak like a sieve, return, still leak, return and get shipped back the wrong ones were from Turbosmart. The only final drive that I've ever purchased that were unusable, twice... were from Speedtek. The only seat mounts that I've ever purchased that placed the seats in the door frame were from Crank Motorsport. The only poorly designed parts that I had the manufacturer confirm should have been designed as per what I mentioned were from GKTech. The only ECU I've had firmware updates consistently break things are Haltech. The only catch can I've purchased that didn't fit in its advertised spot was from ATP. So forth and so on... Moral of the story, doesn't matter where it's from. Do your research beforehand and stick with products and companies you've trusted in the past.    @joshuaho96 If you want it done right, do it yourself.
    • Something coarse-ish. 180 is good.
×
×
  • Create New...