Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

Lost Licence. Then lost job. Then started own business. Business does well. Getting licence back. Skyline does not suit travelling 1000s of Ks which i will have to do often for the work. Thus she is for sale. I really really really wish I could afford two cars but it aint to be :)

Basically this is boostmeisters old car with a few minor mods in tuning and a bigger turbo.

Have a look at http://www.users.bigpond.com/perobbins/dcr/skyline/

(Ta for the pics cam)

Looking for offers, anything reasonable considered.

Details:

Nissan '92 GTS-T M-Spec

QLD Rego til October (slimline plates)

VGC inside, outside & mechanically

2 Litre Twin Cam Turbo

237kw @ 15psi @ the wheels

12.7 Second Quarter Mile

18" DTM Wheels

Falken Azensis Rubber

Hi-Flowed T3 Turbo

Apexi 3.5" N1 Exhaust

Custom 3.5" Dump Pipe

HKS Cam Gears

HKS Air Filter

Custom Carbon Air Box

ARE Intercooler

Custom Piping

Cusco oil catch can

Cusco R2D2 Blow off valve

Cusco Strut top bar

Trust oil filler Cap

Bosch 530 fuel pump

Blitz access ECU

Apexi Super-AFC controller

Cusco Castor rod

Ital-volante Leather Steering Wheel

Duel gear knob

Digital Climate Control (relocated to glove box)

Trust front spoiler

Apexi Boost gauge

Carbon fibre centre console

Alpine CDA-7847e Head Unit

Alpine 5x7 fronts

PPI 4 channel amp

PPI 12' Subwoofer

Custom Stickers on doors and rear window

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15759-fs-r32-gts-t/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...