Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , hearing good things about the T3 flanged split pulsed turbine housing ATP sells as an option for GT3071R turbos . In the US some work is being done on larger A/R versions of this housing that should better suit the GT3076R type turbos . The aim is to have better response with less exhaust restriction so should have more torque at lower revs and boost pressure . The down side is that it means external wastegates with two being better than one .

I'm trying to find out more about the larger ratio housings which sound like .82 and 1.06 , ATP's is .78 so not really enough for a GT3076R to pulse properly and not choke up . Also will look around to see who has the most compact external wastegates .

Cheers A .

do you have a link where anyone has done a direct comparison with say a .63 vs the .78 twin scroll?

I've looked at it a few times and wondered how it would perform on my hks manifold with a 56 trim 3071

No and those looking at this stuff are in the US and working with SR20DET's and KA24DE+T's . Not the same as an RB six but I like to look at things from an individual cylinder capacity point of view .

Jeff Raicer who posts here occasionally has put a lot of effort into micky mouse split pulse exhaust manifolds and twin scroll turbos and says he can get big turbos to spool more like smaller ones do with single entry turbine housings . I'd say it has a lot to do with getting the most advantage from the exhaust gas energy innitially ie when the valves first crack open into an area of low restriction and reasonably low pressure . So hopefully low restriction and best energy gain by the turbine so least pumping losses/reversion and more ignition timing to make the most efficient use of the charge air and fuel .

You can find him at FullRace.com and there is a forum there .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

There are some good reads on the net about this stuff . Search PDX Tuning Results with GT32 Turbokit and APS twin scroll rotated mount turbo system model designation TSR 70 . There's a lot of wading through the dross on this 2nd one , APS has made a split pulsed manifold kit and sells a GT3582R (with fancy drilled port shrouded comp housing like the TO4Z at ATP's site) with a petrol material spec (read high temp capable) twin entry .82 A/R T3 flanged Garrett turbine housing and 3.5" V band outlet) as part of the kit . It uses a single TiAL external gate fed by twin pipes sort of like the pic in the last post . If you don't have half an hour to read through it they're hinting that it spools up ~ 400 odd rpm sooner than a normal GT35 .82 turbine housing - on an EJ25 anyway .

More later cheers A .

post-9594-1172301981.jpg

Edited by discopotato03

i too would be keen to know what kind of gains can be had converting to the twin entry turbine housing.

after all a gt30r on a rb20 isnt exactly the fastest spooling thing in the world and the hks cast manifold is already setup for twin entry...

Hi Carl , there is not as much out there in the way of T3 flanged twin entry housings for GT30BB turbos as I had hoped .

A couple of interesting things though . First Garrett have had for ages a series of GT bush bearing turbos called GT32 ie GT3267 and GT3271 . They use either a .69 or a .78 A/R turbine housing with 70 or 73 trim turbines . They are reasonably cheap and not a bad thing for approx 350+ wheel Hp .

Secondly ATP in the States appears to be machining these housings to fit the real GT3071R turbo in .78 A/R . You really need a larger A/R version of this housing for a GT3076R and while there's a few different types out there I dont have their details . I've been looking into TA/TB34 housings but nothing screaming eureka yet .

With your RB20 I don't know where to go with a GT3076R , they are not easy to excite with an RB25 and single entry housings (not without small turbine housings anyway) . The smallest propper housing I know of for that turbo is the HKS .61 A/R and it is non gated and T28 flange . You could try ATPs divided housings but its a lot of stuffing around plus an external gate and still may not get you what you want . Selling the GT30 and buying a GT28 based turbo like a 2530 may be a better solution .

Your call .

wouldnt you need a suitable split pulse manifold to actually benefit from the twin scroll design? or there is some gains to be had from just twin scroll and if you can run split pulse (sr20) then its even better?

split pulse manifold and split pulse housing (all else being equal) is always better than open collector and open housing. less turbulence at the gas merge, less chance of a cylinder's exhaust valve being caught open when another one is pulsing as well (so less pressure spike variations across all cylinder's exhaust runners = lower average backpressure when the valve is open).

i would only go an open collector if it was significantly cheaper, or there was no other choice. manifold must be split pulse as well though.

well ive already got the gt3076r mounted onto a hks cast manifold with an external gate...so that really isnt a problem.

im currently running the .63 ar 't' 2.5" outlet and it comes on full song round 4.1k give or take.

would the divided entry help in spool time some, i dont want to plunk down the coin only to have a slower spooling turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
×
×
  • Create New...