Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

well I'm thinking about getting a 4WD.. honestly you have no idea how hard it is to stick an 18kg puppy in the back of a 180... I think my daughter is getting a bit sick of climbing in and out anyway..

Doesn't have to be a full-on bush beast.. girly 4wd is fine with me.. esp being a girl and all, and will probably end up another statistic.. one of many 4WDs that's never been off road :sick:

So not keen to get something HUGE, would prefer if it's no longer than a 180 which is about 4500mm (178in) caus I still need to park in the city etc, besides I just don't want a big soccer-mum-4WD.

So far I'm thinking a RAV4 or Grand Vitara or something similar. I grew up with a Jeep Cherokee Ltd but other than that I don't have much experience with 4WDs so I don't really know what I'm looking for. Actually I drove a 2dr Ignis around Townsville.. that was fun.. but only caus I was flogging the crap out of it everywhere we went and flying over train tracks :) Safe to say I'm really more of a rally driver than a track/drag person.

Fold down rear seats is good caus I'll miss the space in the back of a 180.. you can fit a dbl futon in there with some tie downs!.. but I'm just so sick of being SO careful all the time, avoiding the tiniest potholes, going over speedhumps at a crawl, turbo lag, taking every driveway at an angle.. bit sick of the whole import thing I guess (tho there'll still be an r32 here to drive).

I'm hoping it's going to be less maintenance, even if the maintenance/parts are not cheaper, just hopefully less frequent, correct me if I'm wrong.

So anything to look out for? Any other suggestions on what to get? Just don't know where to start.

Looking to spend no more than about 10-13k.. or less and make alot of mods :rofl:

Any advice appreciated!

Cheers!!

Kaz

Another female in a car that has a shitty center of gravity, and could roll at the blink of an eye (Think simpsons.. Canyonero~!). Why dont you consider like, a wagon or something?

More space, safer to drive, Easier to see over and around... Wont roll when you try to take evasive action at 100KM/H. And if your not really gonna take it off road.. then whats the point in owning a death trap? I mean low torque useless 4WD?

Just throwing it out there, I didn't mean to offend.

just compared prices of a Rav4 to some other similar cars and i would be going an:

- Forrester XS

My chick cousin bought an X-Trail, and apart form it not being the most beautiful car out there, it really is very comfortable and has heaps of boot space if you drop the back seats... im sure theres way more options out there but these two i recommend through my own experience. But me thinks thats a bit expensive

Edited by ctjet

I tell you what the Honda HR-V is a nice peice of work to... good enough looking, reliable, fuel efficeint as hell and its very simple on the interior. Hence you wont really car about scratching anything and getting it dirty.

Plus it has a lot of safety extras, so thats always one less thing to worry about

Rav4

dont even bother with the Vitara. prone to snapping timing chains etc...

rav4s are great, havnt seen many problems with them.

for about 13k u should be able to get a Rav4, that would be a 1994 onwards model (SXA11) same motor as the camrys, so they are reliable.

parts are easy to get, and suzuki parts can be hard to get.

id take the rav4.

hope that helps

jarryd :rofl:

Another female in a car that has a shitty center of gravity, and could roll at the blink of an eye (Think simpsons.. Canyonero~!). Why dont you consider like, a wagon or something?

More space, safer to drive, Easier to see over and around... Wont roll when you try to take evasive action at 100KM/H. And if your not really gonna take it off road.. then whats the point in owning a death trap? I mean low torque useless 4WD?

Just throwing it out there, I didn't mean to offend.

Woo Canyonero! If only they sold them here! :)

Wagon is just way too big (long) and not something I want really. I mean if I wanted something purely for practicality/lack of caring I'd just go buy a commodore/falcon/echo like everyone else but that's really not what I want.

I'm not adverse to lowering it or something :rofl: Anyway I thought the Ignis of all cars would roll at every corner but no...

Easier to see.. geez you forget I've been driving a 180 for the past few years.. ANY other car in the world is easier to see out of, can't even see past the car in front of me caus it's so low :sick: (at stock height atm too)

just compared prices of a Rav4 to some other similar cars and i would be going an:

- Forrester XS

My chick cousin bought an X-Trail, and apart form it not being the most beautiful car out there, it really is very comfortable and has heaps of boot space if you drop the back seats... im sure theres way more options out there but these two i recommend through my own experience. But me thinks thats a bit expensive

An XS cheaper than $20K??

Not sure if it girly enough but Go with what you know, get a Jeep. earlyish cherokees r such a bargan at the moment right in your price range if you can stretch it a bit could maybe even afford grand with a v8 ravs etc r crap if you ever do actually go offroad due to no low range gearing.

Was mentioned above but Vitara's Rav etc often miss out on a lot of maintainance timing belts etc tread carefully if you go this way as lots get burnt by not checking these things, seen it happen Sierra Vitarathingo with swift gti motor = much FUN.

There are even turbo kits and supercharger kits that would make that 4Litre 6 go like a rocket, well a big square rocket with aero like a brick. Have taken a forrester on some pretty surprising traks to, cousin kept making me get out n check clearance though as was her baby. Went awsome on the beach to but a little thirsty due to constant 4wd, no worse than my 95 Jeep though.

for jeep info mods etc. look at ozjeepoffroad.com friendly bunch too.

can u tell my other car is a Jeep :rofl:

Its a Jeep thing,

U wouldn't understand :)

Edited by noone

Small 4WD? I second the vote for a forester, even the older generation. I was put off Vitaras after exposure my mates mid-90's model. On chunky offroad tyres, the handling and braking was terrible in the dry, and outright dangerous in the wet - gently ease up to a red traffic light and you'd find yourself at 90 degrees to where you should be facing. No violent slides or anything, just a gentle rotation until 90 degrees under brakes in the wet, imperceptible (the car has NO feel) other than the view of the scenery slowly turning around the car - kind of funny when there's no traffic around (actually, it was hillarious sometimes), but he rear-ended so many cars before he got rid of it. So yeah, no Vitara ever for me, and I'd suggest the same for everyone else.

we just did the tensioners etc on the 180.. damn a whole new engine to learn! :)

So yeah probably not a huge problem unless its something that fails on a regular basis.. snapped timing belt isn't much fun when you're on the side of the freeway.

But anyhoo, thats handy information, thanks :)

WOW I can't believe how cheap Jeep Cherokees are now.. you'd hope the steering was fixed tho, alot of them were recalled due to a major defect.

First thing to go would be that ugly wood grain finish!

Jeeps were never known for great handling or anything but if you dont lift em to far and are persistant u can make em okay for a 4B and I think the website I meant to post was ausjeepoffroad.com

cherokees really are the bargan by at the moment as far as 4WD's go mine never had the woodgrain though, reading your earlier post though if your tallish u might find that you cant stretch out in the back of em to sleep that tumble n roll type rear seat takes up alot of room.

if u want a small 4wd go the rav4... fun lil car in the dirt... they r pretty good i reckon... im not a big fan of 4wd in the city so how about something like a libery wagon... i think u can get the turbo ones pretty cheap now... and its awd...

Personally, I strongly suggest stick to Japanese. Anyone in the game should tell you the same.

Although a Forester/Liberty would probably be the smartest (my mother drives a Forester GT upon my recomendation), I personally would get a '96 to '99 Mitsubishi Pajero 3.5L V6 Shorty (SWB), in GLS spec. I've had 2 of them... they go really well, look good, plenty of fruit inside (sunroof etc), and are good value.

I can vouch for their stabliity, having won several off-road motorkanas in my first one, with only Mud Terrain tyres fitted.

I lovem! :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...