Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm just wanting to get some of peoples thoughts on here. What would people rather be driving a r32 93 m-spec or a 92 m spec? What if the 92 was in better condition than the 93? Would you just buy the 93 because you can say its the latest r32 you can buy? The good thing is the lights are updated from the 89-91 so there like a newer version of the 32. Or would you not care about the year of the car?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158753-different-years-of-r32/
Share on other sites

this has been done to death. have a search. also, this is hardly forced induction.

I say condition matters. Age also matters. if a car is 89 v 93, at 4 years old, unless if it's parked in a bubble, it will be exposed to the environment for longer so it'll ahve more rust etc.

they didnt have door bar thingies... u know.. those things.

Reinforcements which come in handy during a possible side impact...

I guess if you look at what what car I have there are no points for which one I would take..

But in all seriousness, I prefer the second generation of the R32.. if it is a 92 or 93 is of no real difference, except u can say it was the last year that car was made if u had the 93...

type m*

:happy:

You're wasting your time bacons, multiple people have tried telling Nth time and time again that there's no such thing, and that it's actually "type m", but if the information hasn't been absorbed yet..

.....I give you points for trying though :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...