Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158764-another-oil-feedrestrictor-question/
Share on other sites

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:O Cheers :woot:

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:( Cheers :)

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

The oil is under pressure, you can't restrict the flow pigtailing it. You can only stop/restrict the flow if you kink it. If you use braided line there is no need to pigtail it, the pigtail is only there to allow some flexibility [given that it is a hard pipe ie steel and inflexible] for vibration between the block and the turbo. A braided line is already flexible so caters for this.

I would avoid having the hose to short - a tight fit, but I would also avoid having the hose too long, allowing it to flop around and wear on other parts. I would think that if it was around 50mm longer than a straight line fit it would be ideal.

Excuse my dumbness, WTF is -3 hose? And it still doesnt answer my question, does the garrett have a restrictre built in? :P

3mm ID

If its a late model [modern] unit ball bearing then yes it should

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

i would check with them if i was you. tell them the no. on your turbo and they will tell you if you need one or not.

the restrictor looks similar to a head oil feed restrictor.

to me 3mm sounds like you dont have a retrictor at all.

But its supposed to be in the turbo? Not the block?

Does this mean you can't see it? I've got my GT3076 in my hand and the only restriction I see is the 3mm hole/seat that the banjo bolt tightens into/onto. I don't see any other smaller hole.

The bolt shown above would not work, the brass insert would be sitting on the seat, not ver it.

Not sure how applicable it is to the RB's.

GCG appear to believe it is?

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...r/faqs.html#t16

Ball-bearing turbochargers can benefit from the addition of an oil restrictor, as most engines deliver more pressure than a ball bearing turbo requires. The benefit is seen in improved boost response due to less windage of oil in the bearing. In addition, lower oil flow further reduces the risk of oil leakage compared to journal-bearing turbochargers. Oil pressure entering a ball-bearing turbocharger needs to be between 40 psi and 45 psi at the maximum engine operating speed. For many common passenger vehicle engines, this generally translates into a restrictor with a minimum of 0.040" diameter orifice upstream of the oil inlet on the turbocharger center section. Again, it is imperative that the restrictor be sized according to the oil pressure characteristics of the engine to which the turbo is attached. Always verify that the appropriate oil pressure is reaching the turbo.

The use of an oil restrictor can (but not always) help ensure that you have the proper oil flow/pressure entering the turbocharger, as well as extract the maximum performance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To be fair passengers who aren't silly and have been in proper fast cars have often been pretty impressed once you hit 4th gear   
    • I suppose that's true. Barring almost any situation, I'll never sell so what the market does is kind of irrelevant to me. It's possible I'd make most of my money back. That spreadsheet I mentioned? Maybe I could make back more than what the car's total costs thus far are, but the parts and all that is possibly a different story... Thanks for reading. It was certainly a good moment and just makes the ties to the car that much stronger. It's exciting that the option will be there to bring it over, however I have some plans with a shop that may end up keeping the car there longer, not sure. Coupled with the fact I want to move there and haven't solidified any path yet. So in a way, it feels like I'm in a limbo state that is uncertain; time will tell.
    • No worries, everything worked out in the end. I just wanted to make the point that it doesn't matter where it comes from (I.E Australia), it can be broken or improperly built. I would still purchase from these companies in the future. B2R - Not certain how that finished, this was on a car I wired a few things and street tuned. I know the owner ended up shipping the motor back to Australia for investigation. Hopefully some of it is covered under warranty.  Turbosmart - I always pressure test everything that goes on my car. It's a habit from my career in oil and gas. I run two 40mm's and both had major leaks from the actuator to exhaust portion through the shaft. I returned both, they shipped me back two and one was leaking and the other had a 38mm top (40mm gate with 38mm actuator cap, no idea how that happens). Eventually after a lot of back and forth I found myself with two non-leaking gates. I believe this happens a lot more then people would like to believe but you would never know if you don't pressure test them prior to installation. Crank Motorsport - Issued a full refund and let me keep the seat rails. I turned them into scrap metal for other projects. GKTech - Shipped me out a replacement and asked that I modify it as per my idea and that they would do the same for a future revision. ATP - Can just needed a large shim to bolt up properly.  Haltech - They started an actual proper Beta channel for firmware's a few months back and stopped using the general public for testing. I'm now much happier.  Speedtek - f**k Speedtek. I would love to watch them burn.     
    • I've got a Turbosmart wastegate, ATP catch can, many GK Tech parts and Haltech everything. Everything's been perfect, sorry to hear your experience wasn't the same
×
×
  • Create New...