Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When it was new...

Yeah, just like my car did 0-100km/h in 6.5seconds when new.... It still did 14years later when i bought it, stock....!

And I assumed that the question was assuming the cars were as new, otherwise the comparison is very hard, but realistically, a well looked after/maintained R32 GTR should still do the factory acceleration times.

Edited by r32line
i have to lol at the 33 GTST owner telling us 33 GTST is faster than the 34... sorry but it's just not true. 34 GTT is definately faster in a straight line, and elsewhere too. :(

I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

Who cares though? Take each of them to a track and see what order it is.

It would go r32, 33, 34.

Hell a r34 GT-t has a stiffer chassis than any r33 gtr.

And i prefered my R34 GT-t over a 32 gtr.

But now my 750cc motorcycle does 0 - 100 in 2.8 seconds so what skyline can beat that?

I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

You are forgetting that it's not just about outright power... it's about many other things. The R34GTT has vast developments in the engine (hence being badged the NEO), the turbine system (bigger than R33), the suspension, the brakes etc etc. Even the HICAS system in the R34GTT is vastly different to that on the R33GTST.

I think if you compare the facts; the power difference is noticeable but more so the torque. The NEO's VVT system is much more developed than that on the R33GTST I'm afraid.

I think the specs show that the R32 GTR was the quickest 0-100 and in a straight line. But since when are skylines drag cars??

They are gran touring cars designed for the track therefore if you really want to compare which care is quicker - look at track times.

You will see that Nissan has more brains then to put out a newer model car, which costs more money but is slower than its predecessor.

So if you want to know which car is the quickest in standard form, I would go with the latest models of each...

We are however forgetting the V35 -- no one has mentioned that.

People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

Its not all about straight line. Unless you're american.

with the GTS (non turbos) its between the R33 and R34 as they are 2.5L while the R32 which is only 2.0, but knowing the R34 probably has better technology it would be fastest in straight line

with the GTR's ive been hearing everyone say its the R32, but again the R34 would have the better tecnology.

0-100 1/4

R32 GTSt 6.5 14.8

R32 GTR 4.7 12.9

R33 GTSt 6.18 14.4

R33 GTR 5 13.1

R34 GTt 6.2 14.3

R34 GTR 4.9 12.9

+1

r32 GTR is the ledgend and an amazing achievment for a 1989 model car even by todays standards.

of course we all know the r34 is a better car overall, its just that it doesnt do anything the r32 already did 10 years earlier

/runs outside to hug r32 GTR

Imo, the r34 gtr is the fastest

and the r33 gtst is the fastest. the r34 gtt offers negligible power gains over the r33 gtst, yet it adds on about 50 kg.

this just shows that u have no f**king clue what so ever the impruved power and aerodynamics of the 34 make it far supirior then a 33 especialy the neo factor vvti u should go drive a 34 then sit in a 33 and see the difference

Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

This is correct,r32 GTR is the fastest over the 1/4 and 0-100.

There is no opinion,it is fact.

Also when you start on down the mod rd a r34 gtr will need more out put from it to match a modded r32 GTR.

It does not matter that the r34 has more advanced steering/suspension/braking systems from factory.

Once you start to heavily modify a GTR you will upgrade the suspension , brakes etc etc,so a heavily Modded R32 will have all its handling amd braking taken care of.

Bank on at least extracting an extra 50kws from the same 2.6 engine for a r34 gtr to even to match a r32 neck to neck.That means more stress on the engine plus a far bigger budget.

To make it simple for you.

A 400kw atw r32 vs a 400kw atw r34 ,the r32 will be the faster car based on the drivers having the exact same skill leval.

Said r34 would need more power to compete.Dragging that extra lard around has its price you know :glare:

Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

I would like japanese figures on which is faster only cuase A, they have enough of a market spread that there will be enough numbers to show that the 32r is faster. for one you can buy a 32 an mod it a fair bit for the price of a 34....

R32 has more potential, you can do ANYTHING with it, but it's fair to say that the R32 and R34 would be VERY close.

...R33 GTR not so much lol

I wonder if we can find a brand new R32 never driven against a R34??? gotta be someone out there that wants to prove this test for us

Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

Sorry but your wrong, there are best motoring videos (i hope you know what best motoring is) showing the r34 doing a 12.7 and also the r33 doing a 12.8 (or a 12.7, i will try and find the videos when i have some spare time) and both cars are completly stock.

They are lots of other best motoring videos with the r32,r33 and r34 racing together on the track, the r32 gets beaten by the r33 and r34 everytime.

As said above they are all great cars :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...