Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Watching the video I was going to suggest that to you.

I'm also suprised Jack uses 3rd through Southern Loop. I'd have thought 4th was a better option? What do the other R32/R33 GTR guys use through Southern Loop?

I'm using 3rd there as well. I find 4th is good around the apex (actually I think there are two there) for stability but my 2530's are too lagy on exit and it costs time.

3rd gives good punch out of the corner, just have to remember not to get too aggressive on the throttle in the early stages of the corner.

Cheers

Andrew

  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yep I also used 3rd around the southern loop...although coming out of the corner I was running out of revs and had to shift to 4th. Might try using 4th there next time.....Should mention that this is with N1's running 250 or so awkw....

Very impressive drive Troy and Jack, and not sure about any other times but these boys stood out it seems? Love the vids too, and will put on our site for others to see. I will also put it on the Zed forum to rev some fo the guys up as we are on there this Easter Sat for the Datsun Nissan Nationals. You guys sure have set the yard stick. Very handy to learn the track as I have never been there.

Troy looks like you are riding a wild horse. What suspension do you have?

Edited by Boosted Zed

W A R N I N G ! ! ! Data analysis about to happen, BORING !

So: I've dissected the DriftBox data from My 2.7 flying laps, before the gearbox cried "ENOUGH!"

The TT-Compound Re55s on the rear were starting to get squirmy on my last lap, but they were hanging in there. I'll start running through the last lap I did:

Lap: 1:53.5 (theoretical! - I moved the S/F line on the DBox software to before the 'box died)

V.Max on PitStraight=220km/h (I've only got 200rwkw!)

T1: Braked just after 2nd white line on track, down to 170km/h at turn-in, Eased into 0.9Gs

T1: Scrubbed down to 164km/h (1.25Gs through Apex) before powering out to 178km/h.

Into Southern: Braked in a straight line for 20m, before bleeding off into trail-braking, roughly in middle of track.

(Note: Southern Loop is 400m long!)

100m into Southern: 1.2Gs, 116km/h, bleeding speed to 108km/h at 160m, where car goes light:

190m into Southern: 0.95Gs, 106km/h, start looking for that EXIT ! !

225m into Southern: 1.2Gs, 112km/h, grip & track come back to you, on the gas!

400m: 0.45Gs, 142km/h, straightening up, getting that throttle buried hard into carpet. I'm 4.7degrees sideways here! !

And on and on it goes, just illustrating how much you can pull from a data trace. Over those 3 laps, I got 65metres later on the brakes into T1, with at least 20m up My sleeve on the last lap! The data shows I was quite gentle loading up the car into the fast corners, as well as having heaps to spare coming onto the front straight.

You can D/load the DriftBox analysis software FREE from their website - I'm happy to email You my traces So You can see how soft I was in the scary-quick bits ! ! ! :pirate: (no hiding with datalogging!)

Ohh - I'm not sure how accurate this is, but according to this, coming through T12:

10.9 Degrees sideways @1.0Gs, @ 159km/h !

FOR THE WIN ! ! ! !

Yeh i started looking at my data last night before i fell asleep. Looking at the best of each lap there is a 1:49 in it...so i would hope i could string a mid-high 1:50 with a few slip ups here and there.

I have off the shelf Bilsteins from Whiteline that were used as the development kit for the R32 back in 2001. Im keen now to do something about improving the suspension as the weekend reminded me why I didn’t like PI after Sandown…my car as is suits Sandown so much better.

That wasn’t my quickest or coolest lap. The 1:52 flat wasn’t too bad a lap, but the 1:53 flat lap looked the coolest :pirate:

Very impressive drive Troy and Jack, and not sure about any other times but these boys stood out it seems?

Here you go John - see where you can fit yourself into this list over Easter.

1. JagR33, R33 GTR - 1.46.36 sec

2. Aaron34, R34 GTR - 1:46.51 sec

3. Snowman, R34 GTR - 1:48.02 sec

4. Scotsman, R33 GTR - 1:50.1 sec

5 ferni, R33 GTR - 1.51.35 sec

6. BBGTR, R32 GTR - 1.51.76 sec

7. Roy, R32 GTST - 1.52.00 sec

8. Rowdyr32, R32 GTR - 1.52.23 sec

9. provo, R34 GTR - 1.53.97 sec

10. Ant97GTR, R33 GTR - 1.54.01 sec

Phillip Island is by far the hardest track I've driven on to get your head around. It's very difficult to reach your potential there the 1st time out simply because of the speeds and commitment needed on some of the corners. I have no doubt that you will want a return visit after the Nissan Nationals over Easter.

Oh - and if you are going to be running cheater tyres then Highlander ran a 1.44 on them at the weekend as well in an R33 GTR. :pirate:

I HAD done a whole picture-post with captions & whatnot, but the forum won't allow the type of link (dynamic).

I know there's pics of:

TRoy,

Nick (Bonnet pins lookin good dude!),

The GTR that Jack built,

Anthony: (A lil' crossed up in one, just before it gets messy!),

Gareth,

John,

Aaron,

Recovery F.T.W. ! ! ! (You'll see)

Wayne !

Ray: Dude, please, PLEASE pull some fuel out of this thing: (mid-shift)

Steven

Me Passing a WRX (the natural order of things), and later returning broken 'boxed (NOT the natural order of things !!!)

So then, I'll just link to the whole Album,

P.I. Photo Album, taken with Ben's Nikon digital SLR (thanks Ben!)

More boring data from my DL1...

I'll show You my Data if You show Me yours . . . .

Data1.jpg

Like I was saying . . . . . . R A Y ! ! ! PULL SOME FUEL OUTTA THAT THING MAAANN ! !

DSC_2078.jpg

I had a nice lil' chat to George, who's doing the Sakers . . . . . . I'll take two, thanks!

DSC_2044.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...