Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

asking why a str8 6 is better than a v6 is a valid question imo.

I have read auto books that refer to the V as "VEE". Basically it depicts the orientation / configuration of the engine - V shaped and equal cylinders on each side v6 = 3+3, v8 = 4+4, v10 = 5+5, v12 etc...

I dont know how or why the straight configuration is intrinsically better though..[or if it is]...

red900...i suppose u're rite in that instance, but i have seen videos with pistons 1,3,4,6 all at tdc together, specifically, a supra's six. so if u say 1 is on compression n 6 is on exhaust, i assume that 3 and 4 would be the same?

so basically, you get 2 cylinders on compression n 2 on exhaust am i right?? i'm confused...

if pistons 1 3 4 and 6 are at TDC all together it's because something in the motor has gone horribly horribly wrong :(

generally, firing order on an inline six is 1, 5, 3, 6, 2, 4, but remebering that they are paired together, so that 1 and 6 are at the same position in the bore as each other, 2 and 5, 3 and 4 so on. it's the camshaft that determines whether or not each piston at TDC (Top dead centre, or the highest point in the bore) is actually at it's compression stroke or exhgaust stroke.

remember folks, it's Compression, Ignition, Combustion, Exhaust (Or Suck, Squeeze, Bang, Blow if thats easier to remember :D)

The V means the motor is in a V shape, with 3 pistons on each side. this makes it easier to fit in small engine bays, but the downside is they vibrate and therefore engine harmonics is poor. This can be compensated with a balance shaft or a bloody big harmonic balancer on the front to soak up the vibration. it also takes a lot more machining to make and can be expensive.

an inline motor, all pistons are in a line one after the other. an inline motor is very bulky and needs a long engine bay. but vibration is minimal, except with big revs, when the crank can actually start to flop around like a skipping rope. again a harmonic balancer is used if the motor is prone to this. (modern motors dont usually have this problem anymore, it's mainly old motors with big crank journal spacing that did this)

Ok, so we all agree that the inline 6 is a very well balanced sweet sounding motor.

But don't ya just love the sound of a V8 ??? I love the growl (and the sound of the V8..........let see who gets that ?)

Why does the V8 sound (to me) better then an inline 6 ?

Don't get me wrong , when my turbo spools up and that R33 induction noise is happening, I get a half wood - But it goes to 3/4 wood when I hear a sweet V8 (like a Soarer that has been worked a bit - nice)

PS - I'd still beat them all off the line but........

Guest RICE ROCKET

Hmmmmm I have no doubt that what your all saying about the str8 6 is better but I have seen some nice moving V6 Twin turbos, and mummu do they move. What do you think the 300ZX runs? 3 litre quad cam 24 valve EFI V6 Twin-turbo. Can anyone honstly tell me that there is something in this puppy that isnt better than a straight six. An RB26DETT yes but a 2JZGTE.....well letz not go there.

Well, its a bit general to say a straight 6 is "better", it may have more inherant smoothness, but that can certainly be designed in or out of an engine too.

The ultimate power/torque/rev trade off is mostly determined by the bore/stroke and head design.

A long stroke straight 6 won't rev higher than a short stroke V6.

The reason that almost every manufacturer uses v6 is that the engine is so much sorter - so better handling/packaging in the car. Long engine, hanging over front wheels = understeer prone.

Originally posted by RICE ROCKET

Hmmmmm I have no doubt that what your all saying about the str8 6 is better but I have seen some nice moving V6 Twin turbos, and mummu do they move. What do you think the 300ZX runs? 3 litre quad cam 24 valve EFI V6 Twin-turbo. Can anyone honstly tell me that there is something in this puppy that isnt better than a straight six. An RB26DETT yes but a 2JZGTE.....well letz not go there.

The 300ZX uses a V engine to get the nose lower and the engine bay shorter, to help improve handling and aerodynamics. This is a high powered high speed sports car remember, not a grand tourer.

It also has 3 litres to play with, to give it a slight edge over the RB engines in the power stakes. If it were only 2.5 or 2.6L, the RB engine would crap all over it in power and revability. It would still have a slight advantage in the weight and size distribution though.

Edit: Also for some reason, V engine designs seem to be easier to get cleaner emissions out of. Holden's ECOTEC is a prime example, when compared to Ford's inline 6. Also, the next generation of Skylines is going to the V engine design, primarily due to emissions.

A couple of questions thats slightly off topic,

W12 n W16 engines, are there any for sale in Australia?Has anyone here driven them? I've read on the VW web page that the exhaust noise generated is absolutely insane....

and...

Has any car company made a V4? And would there be any savings in making one?

V4's exist in motorcycles, mostly for weight distribution and balance. They're sort of a compromise between an inline 4 (front-heavy and wide) and a twin (narrow and good weight balance, but less power and revvability). There isn't much point to having them in cars because inline or boxer 4's are compact enough to fit in a square enough configuration anyway, in most small cars. A boxer can probably do everything a V can but with better balance characteristics.

Btw, V and boxer engines are generally more expensive to make than inline engines, because they have 2 cylinder heads.

I think...and correct me if I'm wrong..... The "V" style also has a lot to do with the "Torque" of and engine. If you understand torque then you will see why the "V" shape would aid torque. Inline engine's have good balance (as we know) therefore allowing them to rev higher.

But...

Then we get in to bore size and stroke, and then it gets all weird again.

The RB engine was designed with one thing in mind.... Rev's. The compromise was low torque, hence the addition of the turbo (or 2). Those who drive GTS-T's will realise that the turbo was placed there to aid Torque. hence why the spool is early and aids the most between 3 and 5,000 rpm. At the top of the rev band the turbo flow match (i think). that also show's why the turbo's fail at high boost, they wern't designed for that much heat and flow.

I could be wrong in a lot of what i've said here, i'm going off thing's I've learn't over time about car's. The best way to understand would be to talk to your local Mechanic. I'm sure over a Beer at the pub, they'll tell ya all aobut it.

Cheers

Loz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...